Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RapierFugue People think that being anti-death penalty is the soft option. It's actually the polar opposite. And reversible, to some extent. You can't give an innocent person back lost years, but you can release them, apologize and attempt redress. With a dead innocent, you can't do squat, except to tear up old wounds with people you deprived of their loved ones by mistake. Capital punishment might work if the execution was legally changed to a murder if the accused was cleared of the charges postmortem, so that the desire to execute criminals was counterbalanced by the subsequent charges of murder and accessory to murder for the judge, jury, prosecution and executioners. That would ensure that it was reserved for very special cases. Seeing as the capability-maturity level of most law enforcement is about the same now as it was back in the days of Jack the Ripper, it makes little sense to consider irreversible action as an outgrowth of law enforcement. Judicial systems haven't evolved much, either, so no amelioration of the problem there. Using the detraction of introducing a risk associated with making a mistake can probably exert enough pressure. Though it might work, I would still have one major reservation, though: I'm opposed to the idea of a government empowered to kill its own citizens. But your point is perhaps the best one, in that it is one that should carry weight with both camps. Humans must make an effort to imagine time on any meaningful scale. Making the effort is worthwhile, though. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|