crazyml
Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007 Status: offline
|
To the OP: As you say, there are lots of differing opinions over the question of whether "online" is real or not. Equally, and dear god don't let's actually do it on this thread, there are a bazillion arguments to be had about whether "slavery" can be real or not. It depends, I guess on your definition of "reality" and we just don't have the time to nail that question (I'd been fucking with the heads of philosophers for thousands of years after all). Personally, I really object to the implication that "online" is somehow less "real" than face to face. I don't think the onlineness or offlineness of a relationship has any impact whatsoever on whether it's real or not. It has lots of impacts on how that relationship can be conducted, but to suggest that I can't have a "real" relationship with someone online strikes me as utter, utter nonsense. A couple of examples. Sub A has a relationship with Dom B. It's online only, because she's in Saskatchewan and he's in Surbiton. They talk regularly, he controls her life, directing her to study, helping her when she needs support, and yes from time to time they have wicked awesome cam sex and both of them have wonderful orgasms. He's a part of her life, she gets her Maslows from the relationship. It's fucking real. Meanwhile, Sub B meets Dom B regularly for some slavery action. Between meetings there's next to no contact. The relationship is fundamentally about roleplaying and getting their rocks off together. They both get what they want from the relationship. It's fucking real. Now, you might ask which relationship is the more meaningful? Which represents the greatest intimacy (and intimacy can't simply be defined by skin-on-skin - what about emotional intimacy? Personally - and this is highly subjective - I'd say that the first example describes a much more intimate, intense, and complete relationship than the second. Another example... from the boards. I've corresponded with quite a few people on the boards. I've only met a couple in person, but I definitely have real relationships with a number of the others. Without naming names, I've chatted with some of the regs when I'm pissed off about work, I've offered advice (ha! - caveat emptor baby) to people, I care about how they're feeling and sense that they care about me. Meanwhile, I have a neighbour who I say hello to regularly, she borrows my lawnmower from time to time. But I'd never dream of going to her and saying "fuck me, I've had a shitty day..." Again - it's absurd to say that my relationship with person X on the boards is less "real" than my relationship with my neighbour - both relationships are real. The difference is intensity, trust, connection, commitment. I think you can have online only relationships that have all of those characteristics, just as you can have meat-space relationships that have none of them. So... The answer is - "It depends". And it doesn't depend on whether the relationship is online or offline, it depends on the intent of the two parties, the intensity with which they embrace it, the trust that they share, the connection they have and the commitment they give.
_____________________________
Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.
|