crazyml
Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RaspberryLemon quote:
ORIGINAL: HannahLynHeather quote:
I've always felt that the concept of going ahead (this especially applies to females) and getting "experience" with sex or sexual things prior to actually entering a real relationship was just kind of ridiculous. why especially for females? what's so fucking different about it for men? First of all, the men have at least the excuse of "I don't want to last 5 seconds when I'm with a girl I want to impress." I don't feel that that is necessarily something that justifies it, but women don't have that kind of excuse. Also, key that opens many locks, master key, lock that is opened by many keys, shitty lock, etc., etc. I just think female virginity is more "precious" than male virginity because, well...male virginity doesn't involve being violated by a phallic object. Usually. That last sentence has me all quizzical... on one hand there's a very feminist stance that the loss of a female's virginity involves "being violated by a phallic object" - I'd argue strongly that violated is only the correct word to use here if the act is non-consensual. Then there's the very dated stance that a female's virginity is more precious. To the OP... Do what feels right and comfortable to you. If you prefer to have the framework of a relationship that's fine. If you want to explore things in a more casual way with people you like and trust then go for it (and if you like and trust them there's an implied relationship there in any case - just perhaps not a conventional one). The most important thing is use your common sense, which, if you're asking yourself these questions, is something you probably have enough of to get by.
_____________________________
Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.
|