RE: Changing the title as Termy is a...

RE: Changing the title as Termy is a... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Anaxagoras -> RE: Changing the title as Termy is a... (8/16/2011 6:25:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne Had more important things to concentrate on like holocausting muslims. Whats the genocide meter up to now over a million? Funny how R0 denies the Holocaust but repeatedly defends Muslims isn't it? The biggest death of the Muslim populace as a result of US intervention is in Iraq where 122,000 civilians (including Christians) died between 2003 and 2010. The Iraq Body Count NGO head pointed out that the great majority of those deaths were actually a result of insurgents, not US forces. This is the new far-right, they defend Muslims whilst still denying the actual Holocaust. Its like this now on sites like Stormfront proving that the Jews were always the top hate agenda for these people.

Anaxagoras -> The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 6:34:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I can't believe this. I laid this to rest many years ago. Was the government complicit or incompetent ? It was one or the other. If you want to fly a Cessna down to Mexico to pick up a bunch of kilos of weed, you need a cover story. You need a flight plan. They see you deviate too much they will be coming to see you, and RIGHT NOW, not next Monday. It doesn't matter if there were any planes, and in fact, there is even a better possibility that there were no people in those planes, extant or not. But who cares ? More of the classic Termy routine: I tacitly support your stance R0 but insist that I don't fucking care whilst implicating the people I blame. When will Termy get off the fence when he repeatedly threatens to do so? [8\|] quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or Hey RealO, what about the data about the strange stock market transactions the night before ? You know, the ones overseas that made a few people a bunch of money. Let's get it ALL out there. Couple thousand people off work, a couple hundred making a shitload of money, a few collecting huge ass insurance settlements for suites that hardly ever had anyone in them. All this shit. Complicit AND incompetent. No fucking doubt. But as I asked before, what do you want me to do about it ? That makes you a 9/11 Troofer but no doubt you'll act as if you are straddling the fence again. [:D]

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 6:40:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras a free-fall collapse is when a building goes down for all of its collapse. That is how it is understood in terms of demolition. thats a creative definition. cite where you got that koolaid from.

hardcybermaster -> RE: There was a plane! (8/16/2011 6:45:21 AM)
rise above it Anax. If these idiots had a proper platform to speak from where they could influence millions of people it would be worth getting angry about. But they don't, this thread has had 2800 hits, most of which will be covered by about 10-15 people who keep coming back to it either to post or have a laugh. It doesn't matter, not here Nobody who matters cares a jot about this thread, leave it alone. You know you are right

Real0ne -> RE: There was a plane! (8/16/2011 6:53:19 AM)
he had his chance to bow out gracefully many times. Now he gets kicked out the hard way. When they stoop to mischaracterization and making up their own shit as they go its only a matter of time before they drown in it. stick around, this dance is about to get quite comical. They always do when they are cornered. LOL

Anaxagoras -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 7:21:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras a free-fall collapse is when a building goes down for all of its collapse. That is how it is understood in terms of demolition. thats a creative definition. cite where you got that koolaid from. It isn't a creative definition, that is the definition of a free fall demolition that the conspiracists also accept which is why they pretty much comprehensively claim Tower 7 came down in 6.5 seconds, even though this is a blatant lie as the video footage attests, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QilSHm0Luj4 When I googled free-fall demolition all I found was conspiracist bullshit for pages and pages but even their definitions of what is meant by a controlled demolition gives the same meaning of free-fall so you cannot doubt the argument, e.g. quote: Building 7 Compared to the Twin Towers: The destruction of Building 7 exhibited numerous tell-tale signs of a conventional controlled demolition: The building sank into its footprint at near free-fall speed. http://911review.com/means/demolition/index.html Similarly quote: The fact that the towers collapsed in about 10 seconds is clear evidence that the upper portion of each of the towers passed through the lower portion at about the same rate that it would have fallen through air. The fact that the towers fell this quickly (essentially at the rate of free-fall) is conclusive evidence that they were deliberately demolished. http://911review.org/Wget/www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/law_of_free_fall.htm Of course that is complete arsewipe about then falling at that rate but it proves that even their understanding of a controlled demolition resulting in free-fall means a free-fall speed throughout its collapse.

Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/16/2011 7:24:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne he had his chance to bow out gracefully many times. Now he gets kicked out the hard way. When they stoop to mischaracterization and making up their own shit as they go its only a matter of time before they drown in it. stick around, this dance is about to get quite comical. They always do when they are cornered. LOL You really are a fantasist, not just about the 9/11 event. There is an argument to be made about your suspect connection with reality... [sm=alien.gif]

Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/16/2011 7:29:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hardcybermaster rise above it Anax. If these idiots had a proper platform to speak from where they could influence millions of people it would be worth getting angry about. But they don't, this thread has had 2800 hits, most of which will be covered by about 10-15 people who keep coming back to it either to post or have a laugh. It doesn't matter, not here Nobody who matters cares a jot about this thread, leave it alone. You know you are right Thanks for those words Cyber. This thread probably doesn't matter much but unfortunately these idiots do use the Internet to spread their lies. If one googles normal neutral words like "free-fall demolition" as I did just now all one gets aside from a rare debunker site is 99% conspiracist sites and nothing much else so they must be very popular.

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 7:34:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras if a building does not fall throughout its descent in free-fall it is not a free-fall collapse because most of the fucking time it did not collapse in free-fall. again I will ask you to stop dodging the question and cite the authoritative source of YOUR bullshit definition. parroting conspiracy cites to prove your definition! Now theres an oxy+moron.

mnottertail -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 7:51:12 AM)
You have no credible authoritative source for your premise (which your whole house of cards and fantasy is built upon) that free fall only occurs in a preplanned demolition of a building. I on the other hand cite in order, gravity, galileo, newton, einstein and the entire coherent sane world that it aint true at all.

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 7:56:18 AM)
well you kiddies have a problem because my source is NIST whats yours?

Real0ne -> RE: There was a plane! (8/16/2011 7:57:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras Thanks for those words Cyber. This thread probably doesn't matter much but unfortunately these idiots do use the Internet to spread their lies. If one googles normal neutral words like "free-fall demolition" as I did just now all one gets aside from a rare debunker site is 99% conspiracist sites and nothing much else so they must be very popular. yeh thats what usually happens when the truth gets out. the whole world becomes one big conspiracy cite doesnt it. Cant figger out why the whole world is against you. sux to be on the losing side doesnt it.

mnottertail -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:04:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne well you kiddies have a problem because my source is NIST whats yours? No, your source is not NIST for buildings not obeying gravity except under demolition. simple, NO. Show me such a statement from NIST (that buildings cannot spend time in free fall unless they have been demoed.

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:09:07 AM)
LEAD NIST INVESTIGATOR Shuntar: Freefall; "WOULD BE A FALLING OBJECT THAT HAS NO ah... STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT" (video 3) Shuntar lied in the above statement. yes or no.

mnottertail -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:23:30 AM)
No. Not whatsoever, thank you for playing but you are unable to cogitate. let us hang an apple from a tree by means of a string, underneath that apple we will place an upright spear some 10 feet distant. then we give a git a scissor. the string uncut do we have unobstructed free fall? No. cut the string the apple falls, is it free fall, yes (discounting inertia and friction) does it accelerate? yes. it hits the spear, does it come to a complete stop as it impales? (no) does it slow as it meets additional resistance in the guise of the spear shaft? (yes) I say the apple was in free fall when there was no structural component below it. I am absolutely and physically correct. so is the NIST guy, and once again you have your dick in your hands, he did not say what you said he said, he did not lie, in fact he wasnt even in the common sense the least bit wrong...... Absolutely in true technicality (of course) he is a little wrong, there is no 'true' free fall on this planet possible. But like Einstein should have said about Newtons theory of gravity, close enough for the earth girls we go out with.

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:40:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne LEAD NIST INVESTIGATOR Shuntar: Freefall; "WOULD BE A FALLING OBJECT THAT HAS NO ah... STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT" (video 3) Shuntar lied in the above statement. yes or no. No. Not whatsoever, thank you for playing but you are unable to cogitate. Ok so shuntar did not lie, that is correct. Is this a correct graphical representation of a freefalling object yes or no [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/nistfreefall.gif[/image]

mnottertail -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:41:53 AM)
No. Most emphatically not.

Real0ne -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 8:53:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne LEAD NIST INVESTIGATOR Shuntar: Freefall; "WOULD BE A FALLING OBJECT THAT HAS NO ah... STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT" (video 3) Shuntar lied in the above statement. yes or no. No. Not whatsoever, thank you for playing but you are unable to cogitate. Ok so shuntar did not lie, that is correct. Is this a correct graphical representation of a freefalling object yes or no [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/nistfreefall.gif[/image] No. Most emphatically not. explain how you would correct the graph.

Termyn8or -> HA ! There was a plane, but NO BUILDINGS LOL (8/16/2011 9:01:39 AM)
It can't be linear. If the graph is linear the line must be a curve. If the scales are not linear that should be clearly marked. And while I'm here, what's this fence I'm supossedly on here ? Complicit or incompetent ? Those two things are not mutually exclusive. T^T

mnottertail -> RE: The Tin Foil Termy Terminates (8/16/2011 9:02:16 AM)
from some arbitrary time zero to time one there is a curve. You do not reach gravitational velocity instantaneously, as acceleration is not instantaneous. In a vacuum, you're nearly ok there with that graph. Newtons laws of gravity at work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion now if the graph was labeled time one, we would be ok. Otherwise it would look sorta like the first part of your boys graph on youtube, that would be more correct, in the real world. Like the graph I showed you before on this thread. Post 179, and the entire solution to the mess you are making of yourself here. there are component parts which you cannot safely ignore.

Page: << < prev 19 20 [21] 22 23 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875