RE: There was a plane! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 7:57:03 AM)

As I am sure that the trees moving do not make the wind blow.

But I loved 'The Ransom of Red Chief', in my yoot.




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 7:58:35 AM)

If not the wind then what? Oh man I can't wait for RO or Rule's theory on that one. [8D]




Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:04:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
How do you know your brain hasnt fooled you into believing you werent fooled, particularly since you appear to nearly everyone gathered here to be an utter fool?

Pff. I have a cognitive faculty that most of you lot lack.

Admittedly my brain can be fooled, yes. I have had a couple of cases of pareidolia.

However, I am certain about this: two planes never took off; the other two planes landed safely elsewhere.

This explains a lot about Rule:

quote:

Pareidolia ( /pærɨˈdoʊliə/ parr-i-doh-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant. Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in the moon or the Moon rabbit, and hearing hidden messages on records played in reverse. The word comes from the Greek para- – "beside", "with", or "alongside"—meaning, in this context, something faulty or wrong (as in paraphasia, disordered speech)




Rule -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:05:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
There is zero evidence of cognition in anything you have shared with us to date.

There, there. No need to feel hurt and disgruntled. Be satisfied with your own cognitive faculties, mnottertail. Row with the oars you have got and can see. Let it be of no concern to you that mine invisible ones move me far faster on a course that is beyond your comprehension.




Rule -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:07:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
If not the wind then what? Oh man I can't wait for RO or Rule's theory on that one. [8D]

It's superman!




mnottertail -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:11:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
There is zero evidence of cognition in anything you have shared with us to date.

There, there. No need to feel hurt and disgruntled. Be satisfied with your own cognitive faculties, mnottertail. Row with the oars you have got and can see. Let it be of no concern to you that mine invisible ones move me far faster on a course that is beyond your comprehension.




You flatter yourself. You haven't any oars in the water, no boat to row, no pot to piss in or window to throw it out of.




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:12:10 AM)

aw come on Rule you can do better than that. Where are the prisonplanet links, where's the "evidence"?

edited cuz I can't fucking type




Rule -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:17:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
aw come on Rule you can do better than that. Where are the prisonplanet links, where's the "evidence"?

Indeed, where is the evidence? Show me the plane wrecks, please? Ah oh: the evidence vaporized - just like Timmy's corpse. Thus you do not have any evidence, do you?

I have no idea what prisonplanet is.

I never supply evidence. Find it yourself. You are better at convincing you than anybody else is.






zephyroftheNorth -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:19:46 AM)

Ummmm I was referring (tongue in cheek) to your joke that Superman moves the trees. [8|]




mnottertail -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:20:49 AM)

Where is your afterbirth? We have no evidence (and you wont supply it) that you are other than a bot created from an insane asylum, which logic tells us is as plausible as any other possiblility.




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:22:05 AM)

Actually Ron it makes more sense than most other explanations...and there's more evidence. [8D]




Charnegui -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 8:26:38 AM)

Never state anything you can't proove with real documents...




Real0ne -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 10:41:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"No that is not it at all."

You are not trying to convince anyone you are right, got it. Good job.

[you fucking fell right into that and I know you will never admit it]

So what. You ain't even here. Let's fucking talk about Lockerbie, and the Loch Ness monster. Of course I was right there but will acceed to your opinion. Sure. Is that flying pig wearing a dress ?

T^T




LOL

spamthrax is working his ass off proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that he's a fucktard asshelmet.

This isnt minor variations in physics term.

Here is a comparison.

On the left WTC compared on the right to 3 different controlled demolitions.

It looks like a demolition, it fuckin stanks like a demolition, but its really a 3 stage snickers bar!   Honest! 

[image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/WTC7Compare.gif[/image]



Dont be fooled people!

Just because it stanks like a demolition and looks like a demolition it isnt!   Honest its really not a demolition!  Dont be so gullible.  How could any sane person think such a thing.

Just because 1500 licensed asswipe architects and engineers signed a petition that dont mean shit cuz dey dont know shit man!

here is the proof  ->  DEBUNKERZ R US


fuck I cant contain myself this is so fucking funny!








mnottertail -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 10:51:16 AM)

no proof of demolition in any of the pictures you have there.




Real0ne -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 10:53:57 AM)

you want proof? 

if that aint good enough for you file a case lets go

oh wait never mind I forgot that aint proof either

How many times do I have to tell you its a snickers bar!

I feel your pain!  LOL

nah not really...






angelikaJ -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 11:02:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

Pff. I have a cognitive faculty that most of you lot lack.

Admittedly my brain can be fooled, yes. I have had a couple of cases of pareidolia.

However, I am certain about this: two planes never took off; the other two planes landed safely elsewhere.



Rule,

You do know that plane debris waas found of all 4 planes, right?
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-planes 

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-pentagon#flight77debris 





Real0ne -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 11:22:07 AM)

yes "we were told" that plane debris was found for all 4 planes.

in fact flt 93 was sucked into the ground and the chinese returned our engine to us.

I thought that was very kind of them.

oh and what does a magazine have to do with an official investigation?

I do not see a connection?






Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 1:40:24 PM)

Ah more personal abuse from the moronic R0 coupled with the most moronic arguments imaginable as he just tries to blindside others with nonsense graphics
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
On the left WTC compared on the right to 3 different controlled demolitions.

It looks like a demolition, it fuckin stanks like a demolition, but its really a 3 stage snickers bar!   Honest! 

[align=center][image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/WTC7Compare.gif[/image]

Dont be fooled people!

Wow, a few small GIFs of buildings falling as if it proves anything! What further information can be deduced from these images? Building tend to fall downward and cause plumes of dust. Wow, there is a shocker!! Is this truly the best R0 can achieve? [:D]

This is just more asshattery to attempt to fool people into believing his Alex Jones conspiracy bullshit.

quote:


Just because it stanks like a demolition and looks like a demolition it isnt!   Honest its really not a demolition!  Dont be so gullible.  How could any sane person think such a thing.

Just because 1500 licensed asswipe architects and engineers signed a petition that dont mean shit cuz dey dont know shit man!

here is the proof  ->  DEBUNKERZ R US

fuck I cant contain myself this is so fucking funny!

Well done, a link that doesn't work. He has completely misconstrued what demolition is so whilst his conspiracist friends try to make out WTC 7 fell in 6.5 seconds to prove it was a planned demolition (actually it was about 16 seconds), foolish R0 instead pretends it is completely irrelevant that WTC7 was only in free fall for 2 seconds out of a total of 16. [:D]




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 1:43:26 PM)

quote:

in fact flt 93 was sucked into the ground and the chinese returned our engine to us.


Congrats RO you have reset the bar for complete idiocy. Should be interesting to see who breaks your record.




Anaxagoras -> RE: There was a plane! (8/20/2011 1:51:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth
quote:

in fact flt 93 was sucked into the ground and the chinese returned our engine to us.

Congrats RO you have reset the bar for complete idiocy. Should be interesting to see who breaks your record.

They just keep spreading lies mingled in with distorted truth, e.g. I have often read claims that the voice recorders were not found for flights 77 and 93 when in fact both were. Further they keep saying the government line was that flight 77 vaporised when it hit the Pentagon when that's not what was clamined, and a fair bit of its wreckage was recovered.




Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625