lockedaway
Posts: 1720
Joined: 3/15/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
Oh you misjudge me. I love how you feel and I might even possibly hire you because you just might be a very good worker. Then I'll pay you very well even say...$100,000/yr salary. Thing is of course you'll take home say $60-$65,000 paying a 35% fed. tax. Meanwhile my partnership that you helped so well...cashed out those projects you worked so well on...made $millions and paid 15% fed. tax. Thank you...thank you very much. Now I take 85% of my millions and you take 65% of your $100,000 or $65,000 to the marketplace and we do it all over again next year. Now just whose wealth is going to really begin to add up...real fucking quick too ? Mine, or yours ? Oh, and now I am going to branch out into stocks. Still because I risk my capital and hold a year, when I cash out, I pay 15% fed, tax. You could risk your life obviously less important to society, say on an oil platform or coal mine...and pay 35%. Thank you...thank you very much. LOLOLOLOL you know what is so funny? I agree with everything you have said. Despite the sarcasm, you are remarkably accurate. YES...I work for you and you make a great deal of money off of the projects I work on. YOU are my senior partner. You BUILT the practice. Probably you are older than me, more experienced than me, a better trial attorney and I am working my way up the ladder. Eventually, I will either replace you or I will start my own practice. That is the life, pal. Get over it. The only other explanation for why, year in and year out, that you make money on my labor despite my accrual of experience and knowledge is that I don't have the balls to endure the responsibility that you have. See? That's life. Now...you make a sarcastic and snarky comment about the life you described in your post being so much more valuable than the life of the guy on the oil rig. The fact is that the guy who works the oil rig, chose that life. The attorney chose his. The cardiologist chose his, the cop chose his, the postal employee chose his, the car salesman chose his and so on and so forth and so on and so forth and so on. Your problem is that you don't like the human condition. You don't like that people might be born brilliant or born autistic or born brain dead or anywhere in between. I ended up where I ended up. I have no one but myself to blame....or congratulate or....in this country and economy....try to find contentment. Ah...I just remembered something I heard last night that was very prescient. The libs on this board (especially in the United States and the UK) don't suffer from actual poverty. They suffer from relative poverty. So it is not that the lib/losers don't have hot water and that their hot water isn't just as hot as the other guy's, it is that their shower isn't as nice as the other guy's. Oh...and you are wrong regarding the taxes. You have a partnership, there is an "income" that goes directly to Rodgers and Rodgers will pay the same, or higher, rate on the taxes that I will. Oh sure, Rodgers may purchase a $20,000.00 Dali, watercolor for his office and write it off as a business expense...and, indeed, it IS a business expense and so in that fashion, Rodgers will enjoy more of the income that is generated than I will. But at the end of the day when Rodgers does his taxes and his salary is determined, he will pay a higher percentage than I.
< Message edited by lockedaway -- 8/16/2011 9:01:56 AM >
|