RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


farglebargle -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 9:00:09 AM)

Also, "Fleabagging":

[image]http://static.gigwise.com/gallery/flea-naked.jpg[/image]




FirmhandKY -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 9:02:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I get it, but... I don't think it's really funny. I mean. You had to explain it.

But you've "got it" now, doncha, fargle?

Firm




farglebargle -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 9:07:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I get it, but... I don't think it's really funny. I mean. You had to explain it.

But you've "got it" now, doncha, fargle?

Firm



Yeah, but the point remains: If you have to explain a joke, it's not funny.

Personally, I think the exercise, which is basically "demonizing your opponent rather than discussing the issues" is doomed to be unsatisfying, and given that as a starting point, you're only going to preach to the choir.

e.g.: "Big Government". No one is FOR Big Government. A lot of people just think that 20 Billion a year would be better spent on a space program than airconditioning National Guard troops in Afghanistan when they SHOULD just be doing their weekend-a-month-and-two-weeks-a-year.

Until THOSE hard choices are confronted ( doomed-adventures-in-occupation vs. feeding American children... ) and the discussion is always spun as "No New Taxes", then resolving the issues will remain an umet goal.




farglebargle -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 9:09:46 AM)

e.g.: I don't hear the RNC calling for an end to Foreign Aid until the debt is retired, do you?




FirmhandKY -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 9:12:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Personally, I think the exercise, which is basically "demonizing your opponent rather than discussing the issues" is doomed to be unsatisfying, and given that as a starting point, you're only going to preach to the choir.

Ahhhh!  [:D]

Finally!

We have now reached the second reason I started this thread!

Thank you fargle, for stating it plainly (although I'm sure several of the other posters understood it already).

Firm




HannahLynHeather -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/13/2011 2:20:34 PM)

quote:

rational anarchy
i hadn't ever considered that fucking phrase, but to my mind it implies what i think i am moving towards as a philosophy, given that mine is in flux at the moment. imma gonna havta do sum thinkin on thisun. [:)]

thanks firm. <ya damned fleabagger>




Sanity -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/17/2011 7:40:00 PM)

[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fl.jpg[/image]

Did you mean "Fleebaggers" Firm?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/17/2011 8:47:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

e.g.: "Big Government". No one is FOR Big Government.


You must be joking. Bigger government sums up the entire platform of the Democrats.




FirmhandKY -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/17/2011 10:47:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

[image]http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fl.jpg[/image]

Did you mean "Fleebaggers" Firm?

Works!  [:D]

Firm




farglebargle -> RE: A new term for the right to use ... fleabaggers (8/18/2011 5:01:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

e.g.: "Big Government". No one is FOR Big Government.


You must be joking. Bigger government sums up the entire platform of the Democrats.


Well, that's your opinion. For example, I know that pretty much every Democrat is for cutting funding to the War Department, and closing the TSA. Give that the TSA was the largest expansion of Federal Government in a decade, I'd say that at best your assertion is an oversimplification.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125