igor2003 -> RE: Who else carries? (8/18/2011 6:07:22 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: igor2003 Personally, I don't have kids so keeping guns out of reach of them is no problem. Having been shot by kids whose parents didn't own a gun, I would tend to disagree. Carry as much as you like, but don't leave ready for use anything that invites long-range accidents when you're not around. See, it's not the punk kids that got an early introduction to what is behind those statistics after they broke in and grabbed an unsecured rifle. It's me, for telling them not to keep playing with it. "Teehee. Boom. Fuck, this thing was loaded?!?" Priceless, just priceless. Health, al-Aswad. Huh? After reading your reply several times I still can't make any sense of it. First, as I said, I have no kids. There hasn't been anyone under the age of about 30 or so that has even been in my house in the last 8 or 10 years. Unless juveniles actually break in, my "unsecured" guns won't be in the reach of any kids. If they do break in while I am away the only thing that would keep the guns out of their hands would be something like a gun safe. If you only use trigger locks they can take the guns anyway and worry about getting them unlocked later. Now let's look at kids, or anyone else, that might break in while I am at home. Since the topic that I was addressing was mainly concerning home invasion and personal protection the only way a gun would be of any use would be if it is "un-secured". People that are bold enough to do a home invasion while the homeowners are there will probably already be armed in some manner. And NONE of them are going to oblige you when you politely ask them, "Uh...excuse me...will you kindly wait just a moment while I get my keys, unlock my guns, load them, and arm myself?" Now, that having been said, if people do have kids, or if people with kids are regular visitors in your house, then YES you do need to take extra precautions. However, that simply does not fit my own circumstances.
|
|
|
|