RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock?

RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

PeonForHer -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 10:13:42 AM)
I read recently of a series of experiments that showed that both men and women find men's faces easier to read than women's. Personally, I don't have any trouble reading the face of a woman around me, even with my eyes closed. I'll just assume that she's pissed off and be right 90% of the time.

Arpig -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 11:08:54 AM)
quote: Except it's true. Except that in reality, as opposed to fantasy land, it's not. I refer you to these posts where the error in your reasoning has been made clear: http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3831029 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3831077 I hope you are now clear on the concept. quote: This is why men evolve to become better liars while women evolve to be better at detecting liars. I would say that this is untrue, but based on the utter fail you made posting this lie, it just might be so. quote: And of course, recent studies show that women seek less stable men while ovulating than they do the rest of their cycle. We want the best genes for our offspring but that isn't necessarily the same man we want to bond with, to raise the offspring. Why thank you for reemphasizing the point I made that you seem to think you are disputing. See the above linked posts for the difference between breeding strategies and mating strategies. quote: Additionally, anthropology suggests that the earliest child raising teams were young women and their mother. The male was not a long term member of the team. Well duh. I'm afraid I don't see the relevance of stating this obvious factoid in relation to what I said or how it can possibly be considered in any way a counter to it.

SternSkipper -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 12:24:35 PM)
quote: Additionally, anthropology suggests that the earliest child raising teams were young women and their mother. The male was not a long term member of the team. Please tell me those aren't *biscotti in your avatar!*

Awareness -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 12:44:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: windchymes You seem to have "moderation" confused with "censorship". What gets "moderated" are violations of Terms Of Service, not what you didn't like reading just now, You seemed to have confused "thinking" with "doing your nails". The TOS is primarily a legal document which covers a whole range of issues and attempts to limit the legal liability of the site owners. For the most part it's irrelevant here as we're discussing interactions between individuals, not hard-core violations with legal consequences. In this context, the moderators moderate according to the guidelines The no flames/'no personal attacks' clause gets violated all the time, but only select posters get pulled up on it. quote: You know, you could start your own site and censor it the way you like to see it done instead of crawling around here and bitching like Grandma with a rash in her whities. Win-win for everybody here. What and deprive the masses here of my erudite, elegantly-expressed viewpoint while leaving them to the tender mercies of workmanlike thinkers such as yourself? I think not. Someone's gotta be the torchbearer for rational thought in this God-forsaken wasteland of ego-stroking idiots.

Awareness -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 12:45:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri quote: No, because we let children in here and stupidly treat them like adults. Case in point. Booya!! Another case in point.

Arpig -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 1:18:11 PM)
quote: Someone's gotta be the torchbearer for rational thought in this God-forsaken wasteland of ego-stroking idiots. [:D][:D][:D]

windchymes -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 1:35:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness Someone's gotta be the torchbearer for rational thought in this God-forsaken wasteland of ego-stroking idiots. Yeah, because obsessively hanging out in a place that God forsake is rational behavior, as is non-stop ranting about it to a group who doesn't give a shit what you think. So when the torch bus goes by, don't catch your hair on fire.

Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 1:57:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri What, in the name of Heaven, makes you think I, or anybody here, might be even vaguely interested in knowing the object of your adolescent masturbation fantasies? What person purporting any intelligence whatsoever would claim that a seven yr. old is an "adolescent"? "dumb blond seeks dumb blond," that is the story of the rest of your life, and welcome to it.

SuzeCheri -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:10:43 PM)
quote: What person purporting any intelligence whatsoever would claim that a seven yr. old is an "adolescent"? What person purporting any intelligence would assume that calling a fantasy adolescent was in any way calling the person fantasizing an adolescent? I'm French and my English comprehension is better than yours.[8\|] And I found my dumb blond thank you, and while unlikely, I certainly hope she is with me for the rest of my life; she's the greatest! So, unlike you, I'm not seeking. [image]local://upfiles/1246447/A417D5EF63704C6D86B27274069D7C94.jpg[/image] n.b. Please refer to the last line of our sig on the bottom right before you decide you can insult us by calling us "dumb blonds". What do you think TDB stands for?

Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:26:30 PM)
The rendition was of impression at that age, as clearly expressed. You greatly delude yourself in claiming better understanding of this language when you so patently display lack of comprehension on any level. If you are claiming that anyone here is void of your avid man-hating agenda, even a four yr. old, either gender, could figure that one out.

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:40:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri On another thread a poster said that since he was a straight male he found the idea of a man blowing another man repulsive and disgusting. He also said that he couldn't really get as close to a gay male as a friend because of this difference in orientation. This isn't a rare thing, this attitude, it's quite common in fact and it's usually coming from straight men directed at gay men. I'm a lesbian, I have zero sexual or physical attraction towards men, but I don't find man-on-man sex to be repulsive or disgusting, nor do I find hetero sex to be disgusting, etc. I don't watch it, because it's got no appeal to me, but it doesn't disgust me. I have discussed it with straight or gay male friends without any issue. And I wouldn't consider a friendship with a hetero person to be limited or have "a cap on how deep it can go" based on their sexual preference. I have a few questions on this idea that I'd like to put out for discussion. So why do you think there is such a strong reaction? Why, in your opinion, would anybody find it repulsive? And why is this attitude so predominantly a hetero male attitude? Would you feel you couldn't become as close a friend with a person with a different sexual orientation as you could with a person with the same orientation as you? Also the format of the statement bothers me, it's as if what doesn't turn you on has to be repulsive merely as a consequence of your sexual orientation. Do you see it this way, or is it a consequence of personal bias & prejudice? Thanks. C. All aspects of human behavior are caused by either nature and nurture, and when it comes to how males feel about homosexuality, I believe both come into play. In my thinking, no human is 100% female or 100% male, neither are they 100% gay or 100% straight (or 100% sub or 100% dom). We are all a combination of all the above, with some born to behave according to the classic male, straight, dom behavior, and others to behave according to the classic female, gay, sub behavior, and of course every combination in between. Nurture comes into play with how individual people are "taught" to become more aware of the opposite (dual) sides of their nature. For example, a straight male understanding and embracing his sub (feminine) side; or a Gay female who learns to enhance her dominant side. Prejudicial thinking about gays or females or subs or doms or whatever comes from a lack of ability to see none of us are all one thing. We are just not that one sided. All of us are a combination of male, female, dom, sub, straight, gay. It is my opinion that being able to understand the duality of your own nature and nurture, and to enhance those areas that are not well developed (for instance the manly dom who seeks to embrace his softer side) makes you a more well rounded and enlightened individual. But then, my father was a lesbian, so I understand these things.

PeonForHer -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:44:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt But then, my father was a lesbian, so I understand these things. Could you run that by me again . . . .?

Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:44:48 PM)
~

SuzeCheri -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:54:23 PM)
quote: The rendition was of impression at that age, as clearly expressed. I'm sorry, perhaps it is due to it being a 2nd language, but this one is just incomprehensible. Could somebody translate into English for me. quote: If you are claiming that anyone here is void of your avid man-hating agenda, even a four yr. old, either gender, could figure that one out. Most interesting, a lesbian who dislikes you based on your foolish and insulting posts has a man-hating agenda. This despite getting along just fine with almost every other man on these boards and in the outside world. Most interesting indeed, non? I think perhaps this post calls for something a little more forceful than the usual: BOOYA!!

Edwynn -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 2:58:37 PM)
Funny, most every lesbian or gay I've lived with or worked with likes me alot. They had more than half a brain and enjoyed intelligent conversation. Indeed, funny how that works out. My former gay and lesbian roommates notwithstanding, I have had some bit of issues with other people at times, while others want me to run for congress or something. It all works out. "Unlike you, I am not seeking." OK, well, anybody else here that has a brain pulse knows that I am not seeking either, but hey, if your "better language skills" say otherwise, who are we to argue? You have a sick mind, hence the patent projection in the fatuous "adolescent" response there.

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 3:00:14 PM)
A mere attempt to add some levity to a somewhat pedantic post (by me) and a spiteful, nasty pissing contest thread (naming no names).

PeonForHer -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 3:00:57 PM)
Cheri, I see why you're saying it and I know you don't owe me any favours, but I'd be tremendously grateful if you didn't say "Booya" again. Thank you if you are able to oblige.

PeonForHer -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 3:02:51 PM)
Thanks. I was developing a migraine there. [;)]

SuzeCheri -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 3:09:09 PM)
Quite likely so. The "continuum" theory of human sexuality is one that has a lot of merit. Even though it doesn't really seem apparent in me, I can see it in others, so can't dismiss it. To be honest I think, if anything, I subscribe to it more than to most other models. However, one thing you said does sort of surprise and bother me. quote: For example, a straight male understanding and embracing his sub (feminine) side; or a Gay female who learns to enhance her dominant side. In this section here you seem to be equating femininity with submission. Am I misreading you?

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Gagging at the thought of a cock? (9/14/2011 3:22:35 PM)
No you are not misreading me. In my mind, the polar opposite of the straight male dom is the gay (or bi) female submissive. So yes, in a way I am equating them. But only b/c these are absolutes with no real basis in reality. (If this makes sense).

Page: << < prev 9 10 11 [12] 13 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875