RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R?


yes
  38% (21)
no
  40% (22)
what's the point?It means fuck all
  21% (12)


Total Votes : 55
(last vote on : 9/3/2011 6:09:59 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


willbeurdaddy -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (8/31/2011 7:52:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

FR

Rational discussion in Congress might be a start. Or the "post-racial" Obama condemning the vile rhetoric coming from the CBC. Of course condemning it might be difficult since its a necessary part of his campaign plan.

How do you have a rational discussion in congress when the opposing party has publicly announced that it's first priority is to make the pres., a one-term pres. ? You don't.


LMAO. You must be new to political rhetoric. That has been said about every first term President in history.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 12:00:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so coming in here and calling "most" of us pathetic point scorers is your way of spreading peace and tranquility??
well done
Well, why don't you take a hard look at your posts? Most of them are no better than the shit sanity posts.

To the OP: I have some productive discussions on another site. There, on some groups, a post like this thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3817557/tm.htm would engender some discussion, whether pro or con. Here, it got zero traction. THis is actually par for the course here. What does get traction?

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3828803/tm.htm (Nyah Nyah! Stupid rightard!)
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3826850/tm.htm (Obama sucks!)

Hell, I won't even bother to go on. Personally, I'm a Progressive. I expect the right-wingers to come up with some amazingly stupid shit. Conversely, I expect Progressives to be a bit more discerning when it comes to topics to address. Frankly, there are some "Progressives" who are a complete embarrassment to me.

I want them to explain to me how "haha! rightards are fucking stupid!" is going to sway the independants over to my side.

Seriously, shut the fuck up and sit down.




DeviantlyD -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 12:39:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

quote:

Obviously people have their own ideas and beliefs but no one seems to have any desire at all to listen to anyone else, it's just a massive slanging match. Most of you come across as pathetic points scorers. Is everyone so partisan that the others point of view is not worth even thinking about?


Hey, politics, those who discuss politics, what are they if not politicians, for everyone is a politician and would be more so if they had the wit to go for it and become a politician with power to trade.

But what you indicated and I quoted here is the perfect politician, don't listen to others for everyone else is wrong except oneself.

But where have all the foreigners gone, you know all those Brits and other non American representatives that used to participate here, they have gone, perhaps elsewhere, perhaps here was too much and to think this an international website that yaps about American political bollocks only, kind of leaves everyone else excluded, so why bother

But one thing is certain about you over the pond, the shit that is discussed on this forum indicates to us you are more fucked than us in this global community.


Aneirin, what does that "global community" stuff mean?
If my congressman or senators screwed up and it was on the News I really wouldn't care to discuss it with foreign nationals.
I don't comment on political issues in foreign countries firstly because I'm just not interested and also because I'm just not well informed enough about them and I just don't care.
I'd be talking out of context, and with little information and be slowing down the conversation like happens so many times in here with the foreign nationals constantly having to ask questions and not being able to see the big picture.
Add to that the socialist/leftist bent of so many of them and you end up with a tower of babel.
Perhaps C.M. should start another category, "foreign politics" or something like that?
But then of course there wouldn't be many Americans in there.
P.S. I don't know if this is an "international website", it's based out of California but on the internet you can get into most sites online no matter where you are.
If for example (you) started your own "C.M." type of site in England after a while you'd have the same complaints about the "misinformed Americans" I'm sure.
In politics if you're missing just 10% of the information that can have a very big effect on the conversation.



Many foreign nationals, as you call them, know more about American politics than most Americans know about foreign politics. And I would hazard a guess that many of these same foreign nationals probably know more about American politics than a good number of Americans. (I'm speaking of Americans in general, not specifically Americans on this site.)




StrangerThan -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 4:08:05 AM)

It is possible. It is also rare.




Lucylastic -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 4:28:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

so coming in here and calling "most" of us pathetic point scorers is your way of spreading peace and tranquility??
well done
Well, why don't you take a hard look at your posts? Most of them are no better than the shit sanity posts.

To the OP: I have some productive discussions on another site. There, on some groups, a post like this thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3817557/tm.htm would engender some discussion, whether pro or con. Here, it got zero traction. THis is actually par for the course here. What does get traction?

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3828803/tm.htm (Nyah Nyah! Stupid rightard!)
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3826850/tm.htm (Obama sucks!)

Hell, I won't even bother to go on. Personally, I'm a Progressive. I expect the right-wingers to come up with some amazingly stupid shit. Conversely, I expect Progressives to be a bit more discerning when it comes to topics to address. Frankly, there are some "Progressives" who are a complete embarrassment to me.

I want them to explain to me how "haha! rightards are fucking stupid!" is going to sway the independants over to my side.

Seriously, shut the fuck up and sit down.

FUCK YOU ASSHOLE...yep Im just as bad as you think, do I care, coming from you..absolutely not.
edited to add, you don't get to dictate how people respond to a question, you don't get to dictate to what guidelines outside TOS, You've tried this so many times its boring, you are not in a mensa board, you aren't even on a debate board, you are on an informal message forum, that you do not get to control.If you cant take the shit, boo hoo, too bloody bad. You blasted me and another poster for taking the piss out of a subject..you got the wrong end of the stick and got it all wrong, but no apologies, no understanding, just the same dumb ego issues, you are just as bad as the rest of us, so sorry but yes its true
I dont come here to give out my deepest thoughts, with people like you around, my time, is more precious than listening to bullshit after bullshit, I come here for fun and interest. Suffer you whine arse grouch.
Edited because as I sent the fuck you part I got a phonecalland pressed enter instead of my skype button.
make of it what you will




willbeurdaddy -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 9:11:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


Many foreign nationals, as you call them, know more about American politics than most Americans know about foreign politics. And I would hazard a guess that many of these same foreign nationals probably know more about American politics than a good number of Americans. (I'm speaking of Americans in general, not specifically Americans on this site.)


Department of DeviantlyD Redunancy Department?




Anaxagoras -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 9:27:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
Many foreign nationals, as you call them, know more about American politics than most Americans know about foreign politics. And I would hazard a guess that many of these same foreign nationals probably know more about American politics than a good number of Americans. (I'm speaking of Americans in general, not specifically Americans on this site.)

I think its probable that some foreigners know a fair bit more about American politics in comparison to what Americans might know about some aspects of foreign politics because America is arguably the sole super-power today (although China is on the rise) and a huge amount of American programming is beamed into homes all over the world. Since you guys don't have an equivalent experience from the opposite perspective it leads to different levels of knowledge. I have to say though that a lot of non-Americans looking at the US do so through a prejudicial filter of the mainstream media, and beyond the obvious stuff like Bush/Obama, don't really know that much about the place, as far as I can see anyway.




MileHighM -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 9:31:47 AM)

Bravo




DeviantlyD -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 11:12:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD


Many foreign nationals, as you call them, know more about American politics than most Americans know about foreign politics. And I would hazard a guess that many of these same foreign nationals probably know more about American politics than a good number of Americans. (I'm speaking of Americans in general, not specifically Americans on this site.)


Department of DeviantlyD Redunancy Department?


I believe the word you were trying for is "redundancy". You missed the "d". And I could mean that in more ways than one. :P





DeviantlyD -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/2/2011 11:14:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
Many foreign nationals, as you call them, know more about American politics than most Americans know about foreign politics. And I would hazard a guess that many of these same foreign nationals probably know more about American politics than a good number of Americans. (I'm speaking of Americans in general, not specifically Americans on this site.)

I think its probable that some foreigners know a fair bit more about American politics in comparison to what Americans might know about some aspects of foreign politics because America is arguably the sole super-power today (although China is on the rise) and a huge amount of American programming is beamed into homes all over the world. Since you guys don't have an equivalent experience from the opposite perspective it leads to different levels of knowledge. I have to say though that a lot of non-Americans looking at the US do so through a prejudicial filter of the mainstream media, and beyond the obvious stuff like Bush/Obama, don't really know that much about the place, as far as I can see anyway.


You needn't lump me in with the yanks. I live here, work here, pay taxes here, but I am not an American. ;)




samboct -> RE: is it possible to have a rational discussion in P and R? (9/3/2011 6:35:37 AM)

I'm with Butch on this one. I find this place a useful break after working on a project and occasionally I have to do some digging to make sure that what I think I know- is actually what's correct, so that's a learning process, and for me, fun. I work alone in a home office, so hanging out here is kind of my "water cooler break". Some posters have a good grasp of a subject- anybody else remember Invisible Black? who did a masterful job of explaining a chunk of economics. Firm occasionally represents the "other side of the aisle" with intelligence and a viewpoint that can't be easily dismissed. I disagree with Arpig's point however, that the righties have a better sense of humor- I think both sides have their moments, but often just descend to Jerry Springer drivel.

In terms of the viewpoints from the other parts of the world- a lot of issues transcend US borders such as the environment, energy issues, and global terrorism, so I often find the responses of folks outside the US interesting.

In terms of Vegas- I agree with Lucy...but the thought of actually putting some faces on the people (and checking out some asses) here has me looking at my Amex points and hoping I'm not jammed that weekend....


Cheers,

Sam




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125