|
tolovetolaugh -> RE: fucken Huff post is racist! (9/7/2011 10:02:36 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity
PAs point is that the press never comments on black gangs killing whites in racially motivated hate crimes, which he is right about that. Race is never mentioned, but in this piece the Huffpo seems to be trying to not only mention the color of the attackers they (to me) seem to be doing it in a way designed to incite even more racial hatred, animosity and attacks
quote:
ORIGINAL: astraykitty
The reason they labelled them "white teens" is because the nature of the crime was racially motivated you ignorant turd
fuck, show me the proof of those black gangs killing white teens. Anywhere. Doesn't happen. Know why? We know if we kill you that we end up with a needle in our arms pretty quickly.
http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/hatecrimes.html
" New York City. In a Midtown office building, a white woman was assaulted, raped, and anally raped by a black man who called her racist names during the attack. Police refused to label it a hate crime.11"
"
Alexandria, Virginia. A black man walking through a neighborhood went over to a white eight-year-old boy playing in his great-grandparents’ front yard and slit the child’s throat, killing him. A witness says that the attacker shouted racial epithets during the attack, and the main suspect in the case owns anti-white hate literature and had written a note about killing white children. He had been previously arrested for attacking an unarmed white stranger with a hammer. (During the attack, he called his victim “Whitey.”)12 This particular case provides a perfect example of the terrible way that anti-white hate crimes are handled. First, the investigators decided not to tell police officers about the racial aspects of the case, even while the police were conducting a manhunt to find the boy’s killer. When this was revealed by the Washington Post, city council member Joyce Woodson defended this withholding of information from the cops on the front line. “What they did was proper. We already live in a racially charged world.” The Democratic mayor of Alexandria implied his agreement: “Efforts to sensationalize this investigation will only hurt this investigation.”13 To make things even stranger, the FBI offered to send agents and a fugitive task force to help with the manhunt, but the local police rejected the offer. They also refused the help of the FBI’s profilers, forensics experts, and others.14 Eventually, the police arrested a suspect who was reportedly tied to the scene by DNA evidence. In another bizarre move, the Justice Department — which had acknowledged that it was monitoring the case — declined to prosecute the killing as a hate crime. The government’s prosecutor in the case cannot charge the victim with a hate crime. “There’s no applicable hate crimes law in Virginia,” he explained.15"
The site is actually filled with examples. I actually hate to agree with certain people I normally just wonder at when I read the forums, but I find it disgusting you cannot seem to rationally discuss race or hate crimes when they are outside what people seem to feel is the norm for them- in other words white on black.
I personally hate hate crime laws. They served a purpose back in the day when there truly was a problem, and needed harsh methods to fix it, but I find that since racism has died down a bit(yes I know its not dead, but there is now actual awareness) they are now making the problem worse, as they do not address anything equally.
|
|
|
|
