Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 8:38:04 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
Okay, I don't believe they'd cut me a check and I'd get nothing.

(Or more seriously, maybe at best just a refund of what I put in, which it should be obvious why I wouldn't want to divulge.)

< Message edited by Raiikun -- 9/13/2011 8:41:10 AM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 8:51:28 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
But what you have put in has gone out to today's retired and disabled(by the way,thanks).So that's not going to happen.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:02:29 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
To quote myself then:



quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun
I'd do it for nothing.


(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:05:25 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Divulge? Its some big secret?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:12:06 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
I generally don't like to give out numbers that with basic math would give out my income on a forum of strangers. *shrug*

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:19:00 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
And that answer shows just how little you know about Social Security and how much you pay in.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:20:56 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And that answer shows just how little you know about Social Security and how much you pay in.


Depends on whether he makes less than $110k (app.)

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:22:46 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And that answer shows just how little you know about Social Security and how much you pay in.


Depends on whether he makes less than $110k (app.)



This.


< Message edited by Raiikun -- 9/13/2011 9:23:02 AM >

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:24:50 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And that answer shows just how little you know about Social Security and how much you pay in.


Depends on whether he makes less than $110k (app.)



This.



And if you did, how much?

I mean honestly, no one asked for an exact dollar amount here. A rounded figure would have been more than acceptable.

At the most, I would be entitled to less than 130,000 back... thats taking into consideration I have worked since 16 (started much younger but didnt work every day of my life) and the changing rates.

So, how much for you?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 9/13/2011 9:26:59 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:27:37 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
Are you wanting to include the employer contribution? (which in my ideal world, could be part of employee compensation since it wouldn't have to be forced into SS tax).

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:29:21 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
The employer side of contributions would go back to the employer. You didnt pay in that amount.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:30:41 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The employer side of contributions would go back to the employer. You didnt pay in that amount.


Sure he didnt.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:48:28 AM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
One would think that someone as smart as you could do a little research. There are many in the u.s. who are not part of the ss system...senators,congressmen/women and a particular ventura county ca. sheriff's deputy who no longer has a ss number.
So now it is time to see if you are as smart as you think you are



You have made claims you can opt if you like...Yet, you refuse to just answer the question directly.

The simple truth is you really can't just opt out.

While there are some notable exemptions:
quote:


There are a number of groups of workers who are exempted from having to pay Social Security taxes:

Federal employees hired before 1984 who elected to continue to participate in the federal retirement program instead of receiving part of their retirement under Social Security coverage.
State or local government workers (police officers, firefighters, and teachers) hired before March 31, 1986 and participating in their employers' alternative retirement system.
Ministers may choose whether or not they will participate in the Social Security program.
Self-employed workers with annual net earnings below $400.
Election workers earning $1,000 or less a year.
Household workers earning less than $1,500 per year.
Minor children with earnings from household work but for whom household work is not their principal occupation.
College students working under Federal Work Study programs, graduate students receiving stipends while working as teaching assistants, research assistants, or on fellowships, and most postdoctoral researchers.
Individuals who are members of certain religious groups such as the Amish and Mennonites.


When you look at those examples it is clear that the average person cannot just opt out. Sure they never have to accept or collect a check, but they have to pay. In all of those examples, you basically have to run for office and win, get a gov't job, or become destitute..... For all practical purposes, you can't just have a normal life making it in the private sector and opt out of SS.

Me, I don't want to opt out. I am fine with it. I just want to reform the system.

But, seriously, why do you have to be so damn snarky. I read your posts and virtually never state what you feel or think. You just ask little one line questions, or you stab in some crappy one line response which is often based on some BS technicality. Like this one, sure you 'technically' can opt out (if you jump through personal and moral hoops), but let's face it, that's bullshit. I'll give you credit when you pull it with Sanity, only b/c that's about what he offers to the debate. But if you really feel the need to prove someone wrong, prove it.


< Message edited by MileHighM -- 9/13/2011 9:49:57 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 9:55:52 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Our conclusion was that in a politically theatrical moment, Perry stated an old (and factually incorrect) claim that Texas retains the right to leave the union. That is not the same as his saying giddyap, I want to leave. Perry didn’t call for secession then and hasn’t since.




Now this will be some real fun. Texas as far as I am concerned can leave anytime. (even though [it] will increase our oil imports) The American people at large have demonstrated such considerable ignorance as to actually believe this but Texas is a national leader in federal hand-outs the discontinuance of which...ends all talk of secession. (passports anyone ?)

Not going to happen, it is rhetorical ad hominem...CASE CLOSED.

Wait, I've rethought this. This could be a real profit center.

Yes, Corporate Texas would all leave the state and in a heartbeat but what little oil is there, would still be there and with all of those immigrants coming in too and newly poor, maybe, just maybe no longer subject to the US constitution, they could...have their slaves back. I, the capitalist, am liking this more and more.

Could lead the nation still...in job creation. Course those jobs wouldn't pay anything (as if they are supposed to) but shit...they don't pay that much now.

Hey party down Texas, there would be no rules but there would be food stamps. Wait...that would go too. Geez how do we do this and get somebody else to feed them ? I need to rethink this some more.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 9/13/2011 10:09:48 AM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 10:13:15 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MileHighM

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
One would think that someone as smart as you could do a little research. There are many in the u.s. who are not part of the ss system...senators,congressmen/women and a particular ventura county ca. sheriff's deputy who no longer has a ss number.
So now it is time to see if you are as smart as you think you are



You have made claims you can opt if you like...Yet, you refuse to just answer the question directly.

The simple truth is you really can't just opt out.

While there are some notable exemptions:
quote:


There are a number of groups of workers who are exempted from having to pay Social Security taxes:

Federal employees hired before 1984 who elected to continue to participate in the federal retirement program instead of receiving part of their retirement under Social Security coverage.
State or local government workers (police officers, firefighters, and teachers) hired before March 31, 1986 and participating in their employers' alternative retirement system.
Ministers may choose whether or not they will participate in the Social Security program.
Self-employed workers with annual net earnings below $400.
Election workers earning $1,000 or less a year.
Household workers earning less than $1,500 per year.
Minor children with earnings from household work but for whom household work is not their principal occupation.
College students working under Federal Work Study programs, graduate students receiving stipends while working as teaching assistants, research assistants, or on fellowships, and most postdoctoral researchers.
Individuals who are members of certain religious groups such as the Amish and Mennonites.


When you look at those examples it is clear that the average person cannot just opt out. Sure they never have to accept or collect a check, but they have to pay. In all of those examples, you basically have to run for office and win, get a gov't job, or become destitute..... For all practical purposes, you can't just have a normal life making it in the private sector and opt out of SS.

Me, I don't want to opt out. I am fine with it. I just want to reform the system.

But, seriously, why do you have to be so damn snarky. I read your posts and virtually never state what you feel or think. You just ask little one line questions, or you stab in some crappy one line response which is often based on some BS technicality. Like this one, sure you 'technically' can opt out (if you jump through personal and moral hoops), but let's face it, that's bullshit. I'll give you credit when you pull it with Sanity, only b/c that's about what he offers to the debate. But if you really feel the need to prove someone wrong, prove it.



I guess hes a Mennonite.


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 11:35:53 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

But, seriously, why do you have to be so damn snarky. I read your posts and virtually never state what you feel or think. You just ask little one line questions, or you stab in some crappy one line response which is often based on some BS technicality.


Sort of like the beating around the bush Raiikin gave me?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 11:55:21 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
Nah, no beating around the bush, just trying to come up with a number that's "fair enough" for whatever point you might have. :p

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 12:01:16 PM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
So, while not close to any actual amount I might have put in, does 25k work? (It works for my previous point that if I'd been able to keep that from the beginning it'd put me about in range to be able to retire.)

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 12:09:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
If you are not fastidiously scrupulous, you could eat mashed potatoes with a fork, and stick yourself in the tonsils and bleed to death.

A fairly unlikely occurrance, nevertheless about as equal a chance as the vast majority of Americans starting out in life and throwing in 25K and that growing unchecked for retirement.

And an even unlikely scenario on which even a politician would have the idiocy on which to form a governmental policy for the well being of American retirees. Although we see schemes of about as dildorous a thought process.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security - 9/13/2011 12:11:03 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

(It works for my previous point that if I'd been able to keep that from the beginning it'd put me about in range to be able to retire.)


Huh?

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Perry OpEd On Social Security Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125