Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Umm.. I was asking. Hense, the question mark Okay, serious answer. Yes, I see the problem with it. On the other hand, I've never known anyone to be improved by prison. Now, you can take a fellow who behaves in an anti-social way and say to him, "Okay, fine, that's how you want to behave, we'll lock you up with a bunch of other anti-social assholes." Or you can take him and say, "That's not how we do things," and require him to spend some time with a group that is supportive and cares about others, where he might have a chance to experience something different and learn something from it. Remember, he is not being required to believe in God, to become a Christian, or to stand up and recite the creed. He's only being required to spend some time once a week among a gathering of people who aren't like the "street" he came from. Yes, I see the problem with it. But if you ask me if I think it's probably better -- for both the guy and for society -- than sending him to prison, yeah I do. Would I think it better if he could choose between a church, a synagoge, a mosque, or a temple? Certainly. Would I think it even better if it wasn't something religious at all? Absolutely! But if we had something like that, that's where we'd be sending him in the first place. So yes, I see the problem with it. But I also see a problem with the hell-holes we call prisons, the human products of which we release into our neighborhoods when they "graduate," and then bury their victims before we send them back. This is an attempt to provide an alternative. However misguided it may be, for that I give it credit. I give no credit whatsoever to people who just want to bitch about the shortcomings of this attempt at a potentially productive alternative to prison, and then go back to sleep feeling all fuzzy and righteous. K.
< Message edited by Kirata -- 9/29/2011 12:00:23 AM >
|