RE: I renounce Christianity (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Edwynn -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 3:11:41 AM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

"God" never killed anybody, in fact


Gen 7:23 : The Flood of Noah
Gen 14:17-19 : Abraham's war to rescue Lot Gen 19:24 : Sodom and Gomorrah Gen 19:26 : Lot's wife Gen 38:7 : Er for being wicked in the sight of the Lord Gen 38:10 : Onan for spilling his seed Gen 41:25-54 : God's seven year, world-wide famine Ex 9:25 : The seventh plague of Egypt: Hail Ex 12:29-30 : God killed all first born Egyptian children Ex 14:8-26 :   ...  




So, as like the author of the OP, you DO believe in biblical "God", then. What a burden. Nice try, wasting bandwidth on a fanatical delusion written by man (which you apparently take as gospel) as your only evidence that "God" killed people.








StrangerThan -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 3:32:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

quote:

This is getting a lot like a very fast merry go round.
It is, and I have answered these same points over and over. I'm not going to anymore. If the point was inapplicable or fallacious the first time it was brought up, it will still be the hundredth time. If anybody has something to add that has not been said already, then by all means do so, but I'm just not interested in answering points I have already answered repeatedly.

What is undeniable is that if God is the creator then he created evil, it could not exist otherwise. And since God created evil he can not be all-loving as he clearly wants some of us to suffer through no fault of our own. Since he isn't all-loving, he isn't the omnibenevolant God proclaimed by Christianity.

Therefore Christianity is false doctrine.




The concept of free will exists from beginning to end in the Bible, all the way from the rebellion of angels, to angels sneaking down from the heavens to fornicate with women, to Jesus walking through the desert, to choices that God himself makes, to things that God doesn't do right and has to do them over. The logic trap you lay is one that goes beyond good/evil and and true or untrue. It is one where God himself has no free will. In fact, that point goes deeper than whether or not you have free will in that lacking the status of being all-knowing, it at least feels like free will to you.

Yet the Bible clearly states in many places where God chose to do something, in fact, where actions of men or women colored his decision. It would be impossible for God to make a decision if there was no decision to be made, which is what you imply.

So welcome to God school.

You and half a dozen other hopefuls have your final exam tomorrow. The one with the highest score gets to go off and be omnipotent, or at least seem so to the group of unwashed savages you will create.

Here is your question, and there's only one. In one hundred words or less, describe how you will create this world and what conditions must exist to satisfy these two points. 1) the inhabitants must have free will, and 2) you cannot set them up to fail.






ChatteParfaitt -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 4:32:17 AM)

This is my entire quote.

quote:

Stop attributing to God, what is not God's. God is love, God is goodness, God is everything that is right in the world.

So who do you give all that evil? Satan, of course. To believe in God is to believe in Satan.

Two sides of the same coin.

Think (please) about that statement.


God did not create Satan anymore than Satan created God. God just IS. Satan just IS.

Two sides of the same coin, remember?

You cannot have God w/o Satan, anymore than you can have daylight w/o night, than you can have life w/o death (something must die to feed you), good w/o evil, light w/o dark.

Our universe is one of balance. It's one of opposites. The two opposites TOGETHER make the whole.

I do not see Satan as the great horned beast ruling a fiery hell anymore than I see God as the bearded man being worshiped by the angels in heaven. Try to look at God as the spiritual personification of all that is good, and Satan as the spiritual personification of all that is bad.

I under the recent loss of your friend is causing you to do much soul searching and reflecting. Reject religion if you will (I did early on in life), but don't reject God or the concept of God. To do so means rejecting good.

Most humans embrace the good and reject the bad. They look for the good in their lives, knowing bad must follow, as night follows the day.

I know you are trying to understand why your friend? What particular imbalance in the universe caused her death. But this is not a question you can answer. I can't answer it, no one can answer it.

In order to move on past this death you will need to accept what IS, w/o letting it jaundice your entire view of life.

I wish you the best in this endeavor.

Spiritual Chatte




OrionTheWolf -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 5:44:38 AM)

Because "God" is not infinitely good and loving. "God" is all things, and if there is nothing to exist in contrast to something, then that something just is, and does not exist as anything else. So with good comes evil, with love comes hate, etc. What purpose does it servere? To drive someone away from something, just as love often attracts.

As I stated, if you use the Christian doctrine as proposed by major religions, and do not take into account that Paul had much of it changed via his own writings, then you are correct and there is no sense to it. If you look to the Old Testiment, where it can be verified in translation, then look only to the words attributed to The Christ, then it makes more sense.

Death gives meaning to life, and both are part of the same cycle.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

quote:

If you love, then you must accept there will be hate.
Why? Why does it have to be that way? Why couldn't God, if he was infinitely good and loving, have made so that hate simply never happened? What purpose does hatred serve?





OrionTheWolf -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 6:07:56 AM)

I believe this is often the crux of misunderstanding. If freewill is given, then there is no predestination, only probabilities. "God" created it all, seemed to be involved a lot in the beginning, and now seems less involved as things have progressed. Stories from very old religions are written in metaphore and parabel to teach, they are not always literal words.

It is man that has attributed much to what "God" is and does, and that may or may not be true.

As to disease, natural disasters, etc., they are a check and balance upon life. They are supposed to be population checks, as well as humans achieve best when under duress, kind of like a hammer tempering steal. The problems come in when man has achieved ways to get around many of the checks and balances, or to avoid the duress.

I am attempting to stay within the realms of the Abrahamic religions, but much of what you ask is better understood from an Eastern, or even "Earth" religion.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

quote:

Oh?!! And your proof God "knew" this is???
He's omniscient, all knowing, having infinite knowledge. He knows everything.





OrionTheWolf -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 6:13:23 AM)

But there is a difference between blind faith, and having supportive knowledge to believe things not yet proven. Doubt removes belief, and doubt creates questions. Both belief and doubt are necessary for the quote that you use. Understanding that duality of existance is a foundation of your the quote you use.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

 
Once again, this thread has very well demonstrated...

For those who believe, no explaination is necessary. For those who do not, no explaination is possible.
 
 





LaTigresse -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 6:54:44 AM)

I've not caught up with the entire thread........just sitting here waiting on a damned train. But I wanted to say that I appreciate your last few posts Orion.

I've been wanting to add my thoughts to this thread but haven't had the time and I am not sure I will soon. The thread might be totally shot when that happens.

I don't believe in God, Satan, any of that hoohaa, the way modern day Christianity teaches, or practices it. As I said elsewhere the other day......to ME, the modern day bible is about as worthless as tits on a boar. Pretty damned worthless.

As for the whole idea of, if there is so much senseless suffering, especially of 'innocents' how can there be a god. That is the thought process that lead me to doubting what I had been taught from birth.....about 35 years ago.

Cheri, a lot of my early doubts, struggles, etc...........started from a place similar to your own. IF you wish, I will write a detailed reply that may help you.........as soon as I get a chance. I can even email it on the other side if this thread is too far gone by the time I am able.

One sentence, and right now I just do not remember where it came from but I believe it was an eastern religioun teaching, has helped me dramatically. Just realizing it, accepting it, knowing that there will not always be any sort of rhyme or reason for it, it just IS.......gives me a little more inner peace in some odd way.

'There will be suffering.'




OrionTheWolf -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 7:28:00 AM)

"There will be suffering, so that the appreciation of joy can be understood." That is a loose translation.




TreasureKY -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 8:59:10 AM)

Good morning, Cheri,

I want to start out making a couple of points on things that appear to me to be missing from the overall picture you paint.

First, the "Christian" faith covers a very broad area that isn't universally agreed to.  Religion is a construct of man and is inherently flawed.  You appear to take the beliefs of fundamental Christians (those who believe the Bible is both literal and infallible), and apply them across all Christian denominations. 

About the only tenet universally shared by Christian denominations is that Jesus of Nazareth was the promised Messiah.

While there are writings and historical records written by other men available, every bit of it is questionable.  Even the Ten Commandments, widely accepted as words directly from God, are subject to the mis-translation and misinterpretation of man, as well as the distortion of understanding through time and distance.  To say that man is very limited in his knowledge when it comes to God, is an understatement of "biblical" proportions.  

The questions you have raised, have been raised countless times by countless number of people throughout the history of mankind.  What you have been getting in the way of answers is a mere shadow of the contemplation and soul-searching that those here have put into understanding those very questions.  I know for myself that it would take a book of massive size to record every experience, every thought, every feeling of my life's history that has brought me to the place where I am in my faith.  Without that kind of background, no one here can guide you to your answers, and they would still differ as you have your own history to consider.

Again, I do not claim to have the answers.  What I know and feel today will be changed incrementally by the events of tomorrow, and the future.  The ideas and possibilities I present for your consideration are merely those things I have found some consistency in during my own search for answers.  Maybe they will help you in yours, maybe they will not.

I do firmly believe, however, that should we ever find ourselves in a place of absolute certainty with regard to the existence and nature of God, we will be wrong.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

... What possible real choices do you have when the outcome of those choices is known in advance.


It seems to me what you've written essentially comes down to this one question.  It is a good question.  Consider it a compliment that by asking it, you have been in good company throughout mankind's history.

I wish I could give you a definitive answer that would satisfy, but more learned people than I have struggled with this one for eons.  I will tell you that, at the place I am in my life, I find a small measure of understanding in considering all the decisions we make in life where we know the outcome will be less than desired. 

Why do people have children?  We all know, without doubt, that they will one day die.  We can be certain that they will have moments of tragedy and heartache and that they will, without doubt, know pain in their life.  If these certainties weren't enough, we also risk suffering much greater sorrows.  What if they die young?  What if they are physically deficient and have to struggle?  What if something happens to us and they are left alone?

I wish I could say that there was a single answer.... and that the answer is the magnanimous idea that the joy of life and love far exceed the certainty of heartache.  But with man, there are infinite possibilities.  All I can tell you is that it is obvious that human kind has found reason enough throughout time to risk procreation.

Only you can answer for yourself if the tragedy that befell your friend was worth her never having been born.  You are in a unique position of knowledge now... could you comfortably apply that knowledge as if you had the power to re-write history?  You know how her life will end; would you gladly give up her existence to avoid that?  Would her family agree with you?  Would the people whose lives she touched feel the same?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

... it is a matter of the world being incompatible with God as defined by Christianity.


I cannot rebut your thoughts and the pain you feel.  They exist and are as valid as any thoughts and feelings I may have.  I would point out that the statement you make above is probably more correct than I think even you can imagine.

There is no correct definition of God by Christianity.  As I've mentioned above, Christians are not united in their beliefs.  I don't believe that we can define God for anyone else.  I believe God is personal and unique to each person.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

... But you would have me believe he is infinitely good.


Actually, no... I wouldn't.  As I mentioned previously, I do not believe that God is one-dimensional.  I believe that, just as we are complex creatures, God is infinitely more so.  Historical anecdotes show us that God is many things... angry, jealous, vengeful, uncompromising, compassionate, generous, benevolent.  Because I can understand the nature of man, I feel that I cannot ascribe to God any less.

There are many people in my life that I would consider to be kind and loving and good.  But I do not assume because of that, that they cannot also be angry or jealous or vengeful.  Why would God not be capable of just as much depth?

If the story related in the Bible of Moses and the burning bush is an accurate representation of how God wished us to understand his nature, then אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה ("Ehyeh asher ehyeh" or "I am that I am") is what we get.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

Your child in a bubble analogy only applies because that is the way God created the world, he could have created it so that never choosing the bad or eviol act was infinitely fulfilling. Yet he didn't. Why?


Why didn't God create the grass to appear purple to us?  Why weren't we created to breathe water?  Why don't we have eyes in the back of our heads as well as the front?

There are certainly many different possibilities other than the ones we have.  Some much more valid than what exists.  Personally, I do not understand why we only get one set of permanent teeth when they were obviously not designed to last a lifetime.

I wish I could give you an answer.  Someday, I hope to know.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

God had to create evil, it couldn't exist otherwise. We don't create it, we may cause it, but we are not the reason it exists. It exists for the same reason that everything else does. God created it, he created everything.


Did God create Himself? 

Did God create good and evil, or is their existence due to His?

I am willing to entertain the idea that evil exists because good exists. 

I wish I could tell you why they exist, but the result of the existence of both good and evil is readily apparent.  It is part of the depth of complexity of our life and existence.  I believe that without the existence of both good and evil, our existence would surely be more pleasant, but it would be substantially more shallow and have less meaning.

I realize this is all vague and cannot begin to answer your question.  Please just be willing to accept that your concept of God creating everything may be skewed.  Consider the possibility that God designed and created this universe, but after that, we've been pretty much on our own.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

If God has the attributes that Christianity attributes to him, evil and suffering cannot exist, neither can free will. Now, since I know for a fact that suffering exists along with evil, i also know that god does not have the attributes attributed to him by Christianity, and therefore, Christianity is a false doctrine, because it misrepresents the nature of God.


I would make only the following corrections to your premise...

Now, since I know for a fact that suffering exists along with evil, i also know that god does not have ONLY the attributes attributed to him by SOME FORMS OF Christianity, and therefore, SOME FORMS OF Christianity ARE AN INCOMPLETE doctrine, because THEY DO NOT ACCURATELY REPRESENT the nature of God.

I would counter with the simple fact that we cannot know the complete nature of God.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

Regardless of my beliefs or anyone else's, you have to find the answers for yourself, the ones that work for you.

None of us can tell you why God, nature or fate allowed your friend to die, nor can we make you change your mind one way or the other, we can only offer condolences and the hope that one day, you will come to terms with what happened in a way that works for you.


This is very much worth repeating.  [:)]




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 9:41:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Endivius


The only crazy batshit, as is frequently the case, has come from you.  Nice try.[8|]





GreedyTop -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 9:49:02 AM)

Treasure.. I adore you.. we must get together soon. that is honestly one fo the best summations I have ever seen...




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 9:55:06 AM)

Yes, but note the below does not state "For those who blindly believe..."  For me personally, and as I've stated a couple times now, I've seen God in my life -- so it is not "blind faith", but "faith" in that which I've personally witnessed.  As to the "duality"... hey, given I don't know the secrets of the universe, that seems as plausible a theory/explanation as any -- so why not?!! [:)]

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

But there is a difference between blind faith, and having supportive knowledge to believe things not yet proven. Doubt removes belief, and doubt creates questions. Both belief and doubt are necessary for the quote that you use. Understanding that duality of existance is a foundation of your the quote you use.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA


Once again, this thread has very well demonstrated...

For those who believe, no explaination is necessary. For those who do not, no explaination is possible.
 
 






MasterSlaveLA -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 10:12:10 AM)

 
Interestingly, I was actually thinking about this late last night after signing off... in that, while it may be a "disaster" to US (people) because who chose to build Condos in Florida or barns in Kansas, it's merely a cycle of the earth.  Granted, I don't know if "population checks" is the intent (with regard to natural disasters), but given things like hurricanes, tornados and such generally happen during specific times of the year, it's obvious there's a "cycle" to things.


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

As to disease, natural disasters, etc., they are a check and balance upon life. They are supposed to be population checks, as well as humans achieve best when under duress, kind of like a hammer tempering steal. The problems come in when man has achieved ways to get around many of the checks and balances, or to avoid the duress.

I am attempting to stay within the realms of the Abrahamic religions, but much of what you ask is better understood from an Eastern, or even "Earth" religion.


quote:

ORIGINAL: SuzeCheri

quote:

Oh?!! And your proof God "knew" this is???
He's omniscient, all knowing, having infinite knowledge. He knows everything.






MasterSlaveLA -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 10:26:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY


Good post, Treasure. [:)]

For me, and as has already been stated, I could honestly care less if anyone cares to believe or not -- that's THEIR choice... part of the whole "free will" thing.  The logical failure I see is in the view of extremes:

Belief in God = God is responsible for everything (no personal accountability)

Non-Belief in God = Shit happens (complete personal accountability)


For me, I subscribe to the "God helps those who help themselves" thing -- i.e., certain gifts and/or challenges are given, and WE CHOOSE what WE do with them.





GreedyTop -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 10:38:14 AM)

~FR~

I was raised Epopsical (yes,... I know.. most Episcopalians will giggle)

in my almost 50 yrs of life, I have never been closely acquainted with the vengeful, angry, vindictive god that I think Cheri is seeing now (and I do not fault her for that). Of course, I have never had to deal with the tragedy that she is, now.

Cheri.. there IS no answer.. whether it is god or humans.. there IS no answer for SENSELESS (to us) violence. I agree with Chatte.. GOD(goodness) IS. EVIL(Satan) IS. and yes, there IS free will.. but how do you know that the "free will" decisions you make are NOT predestined?

How do you know that they aren't?

because a tome that was transcribed by flawed humans says so?

because some guy in a funny hat says so (oh, come on.. who HASNT giggled at the Popes headgear?)

There are so many intangibles, nuances, translations, interpretations, etc etc etc...

*hugs* I am not trying to deny/diminish your feelings or beliefs, by any stretch of the imagination..




NOBODY HAS A DIRECT LINE TO THEIR DIETY!! (unless they live in NYC and teh Diety's name is Sammy) *kudos to anyone who gets that reference*




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 10:52:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I am sorry but this is plain wrong. Yahweh in the Bible messes up with mankind constantly, notably including the total genocide of everybody on Earth but a single family, but also including many other cases. So - what you are telling is absolutely not what the Bible says. You can believe it, of course, but it is not the Yahweh, the God of the Biblie. Best regards.


Total genocide of everyone on earth but one family? You actually believe that?



Many believe the flood of Noah was localized to a region, not the entire earth.  I have no idea what percentage of people believe the entire earth was flooded or not, but from the standpoint of a parable, I can see why the word "earth" was used.  It'd be akin to someone today saying, "Everything was ruined" after a fire, or hurricane, or earthquake, or whatever.  Obviously not "everything" (i.e., the entire earth) was "ruined", but it's how a person might express the circumstances.





SuzeCheri -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 12:44:41 PM)

Thank you all for your comments, it seems there has been a few misconceptions here and there.

First, I am not an atheist. I am beginning to question the existence of a God (more and more in fact as a result of the absurdist nature of some of the defences of God offered on this thread), but at this point I am still inclined to believe in a supreme being of some sort. I am a questing theist in as much as I am trying to find a model of this divine being, or beings, that fits with the reality I see around me. The first conclusion I have come to is that the all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, perfectly just, incapable of doing wrong God of Christianity simply cannot be the correct model because it just doesn't hold up to logical or rational examination that takes into account reality. By the very tenets of the faith, that god is too full of contradictions. To say we just have to accept it because God is beyond our comprehension just doesn't work with me, if a concept of God requires me to suspend my reason and to ignore everything I see and know about the world around me in order to believe in him, then I say that is a flawed concept.

Second, the questions I have asked of people aren't meant as challenges or arguments, nor am I really looking for answers because I don't have them. They are the questions I have already asked myself. At this point I am confident of the validity of the conclusions I have drawn, conclusions based on the answers I have found to those, and many other similar questions. I am genuinely interested in any answers others have for those questions, because while I am pretty sure I have the correct answers, I don't particularly like those answers. Perhaps somebody has a better answer, one that fits the reality, and that I can be more comfortable with.

And third, that I am blaming God. I'm not, I am just examining the origin and reason for the world being the way it is. If something causes pain or discomfort, then the reason it does is because people were designed to feel pain or discomfort at that thing. I am not assigning blame, I was not asking who caused me the pain, I am asking why I feel the pain. I don't know who is responsible for my pain, that is whoever killed my friend and the police haven't figured out who that is yet. But the reason I am feeling any pain is because it is human nature to do so. And "human nature" is another term for "the way God created humans". If it is in our nature to do something, that is because God wanted us to do that thing. I am looking for a model of God that is compatible with that fact. Inventing esoteric excuses, or redefining words in order to shoehorn a particular model into compatibility with that fact also doesn't work. If a concept of God doesn't fit with the facts without disregarding or twisting those facts, then it's wrong.

Fourth, that I don't believe in free will. I do. That is one of the problems. Free will is incompatible with the God of Christianity. I am seeking a way of conceiving of God that is compatible with the existence of free will.

And finally, that the wonderfully courageous people who have written me on the other side to attack and insult me in secret seem to think this will have any effect on me. It won't. I never even see those messages. Hannah Lynn is screening the messages, if its one of the ignorant ones she just deletes it. After she is done, I read what is left over. So feel free to send them, all they do is make Hannah Lynn laugh.

One thing I have noticed is that several people have redefined God in order to make him compatible with reality, that is what I am in the process of doing, and I am interested in what models others have.

And finally, to MSLA. For somebody who claims they "could honestly care less if you or anyone else believes in God or not" and says it "matters not" if I accept or reject your answers, I find it odd that you are investing so much time, effort, and animosity in telling me just how wrong I am. [:D]




tazzygirl -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 12:46:58 PM)

quote:

Fourth, that I don't believe in free will. I do. That is one of the problems. Free will is incompatible with the God of Christianity. I am seeking a way of conceiving of God that is compatible with the existence of free will.


I have to ask how you came to this conclusion.




SuzeCheri -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 1:15:56 PM)

I've explained it several times in this thread already. You ignored, misunderstood, or disagreed with it those times, so there's nothing to be gained in repeating myself.




SuzeCheri -> RE: I renounce Christianity (10/1/2011 1:44:48 PM)

quote:

You cannot have God w/o Satan, anymore than you can have daylight w/o night, than you can have life w/o death (something must die to feed you), good w/o evil, light w/o dark.

Our universe is one of balance. It's one of opposites. The two opposites TOGETHER make the whole.

That's close to the Parsi religion's view of things, or at least what I know of it based on what a friend of mine who is a Parsi told me about it.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625