RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


outhere69 -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 3:07:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
How long before he has most of this section on ignore?

I give him 24 hours, especially if he shows up on a political thread of any stripe.




outhere69 -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 3:10:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
I said that 2+2=4 is an opinion. I did not say that it is not a fact. What is a "fact" or not, can be decided using different systems. These systems are called "knowledgment systems" (or something similar, I am translating spanish phylosophical concepts here, "sistema de conocimiento"). One of this is, for example, evangelical fundamentalism. According to this knowledgment system, God made the Earth in seven days of 24 hours, some thousands of years ago. This is a fact... for this knowledgment system.
Now - when I say that 2+2=4 is a fact, is because I use another knowledgment system, which I call "reason" (and I am not the only one who calls this system in this way, but I am ready to keep this as "my opinion only"). According to this system, 2+2=4, and as I trust reason, this is also my opinion. My opinion is, that this is true, that this is a fact. So - it is an opinion. And a fact. For this system.
And according to the same system, what I said over Jesus of Nazareth is a fact. And yes, also my opinion. Like that 2+2=4.
I hope you understand now my sentence better. Thank you for your questions and have a nice day.

This is something I usually expect from drunk/stoned/altered philosophy majors. Especially male ones.  heh heh heh.




SternSkipper -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 3:15:07 PM)

quote:

This is something I usually expect from drunk/stoned/altered philosophy majors. Especially male ones. heh heh heh.


I once suffered through a passenger who was tripping and a masters candidate in chemistry do a rap on entropy all the way from boston to rich stadium in buffalo... I nearly died.
Excruciating





SternSkipper -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 3:17:50 PM)

quote:

It was a kids' show, before they saw the bigger money in religion


that's just COMPLETELY FUCKED.... Exponentially worse than Barney even.





FirmhandKY -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 4:59:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Premature ignorification

Damn fine phrase Lucy!  [:D][:D]

It's just full of potential.  Where's that "phrase of the day" person, anyway?

Firm




tazzygirl -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 5:04:51 PM)

its sunshinemiss... lol




Lucylastic -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 5:32:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Premature ignorification

Damn fine phrase Lucy!  [:D][:D]

It's just full of potential.  Where's that "phrase of the day" person, anyway?

Firm

yeah I actually wrote that down long hand to save it:)




blacksword404 -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 10:13:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

Damn! You make that sound so...dirty...*squirms*

;)


*leans in close* Sometimes it is. Worry not. I'm sure moisture will be involved.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 10:30:00 PM)

quote:

by honest, I meant using ignore instead of having to come up with a good argument or debate on others points of views, opinions and even facts, that differ from yours. It makes people think that you only believe your POV is the right one
My english is lazy at times, I should have made that clearer.

Hello again. Well, people can think what they want about me, it is up to them. If they want to check out if this is truly so, they can simply disagree respectfully and see what happens. Or see what happens when other people do (right now, in "A bit on epistemology", my conversation with Anaxagoras, whom I do not have the slightest intention to "hide").
But if they want to believe that I am not able to debate other points of view, it is really, up to them. I am sorry but I really, really do not care.
I do believe that my POV is the right one. If I believed that my POV is not the right one, I would change my POV. I am a bit surprised about that sentence of yours.
I understand that you speak your mother tongue, just sometimes it can be difficult for me to get it. My fault.
Have a nice day.

outhere: Ok then, on "hide", I guess you know the reasons and I hope it is ok for you. We truly do not need each other, isn't it? :) BTW, you may be completely right about the majority of the people here... I do not care if I end up hiding, heck, 95% of them. If there is still somebody to speak with, it will be a win. And nobody looses, IMO.




Real0ne -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 11:00:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Premature ignorification

Damn fine phrase Lucy!  [:D][:D]

It's just full of potential.  Where's that "phrase of the day" person, anyway?

Firm



Now there is an idea for a new vaccination.






Real0ne -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/1/2011 11:10:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
I said that 2+2=4 is an opinion. I did not say that it is not a fact.

If it's an opinion, then it isn't a fact.
As somebody who's coming out with a load of nonsensical blather about half understood philosophy, I suppose it's too much to hope for that you can grasp a point that simple.


OMG tel me its not so!

His opinions arent fact?   I may have ignorify him!  LMAO






susie -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 12:13:17 AM)

Best breakfast entertainment so far this year. Only thing missing is a post from Hunky and watching how the OP would deal with that. Oh yeah I forgot... Ignore




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 5:25:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster

Back later to respond to SpanishAssHat.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 7:01:25 AM)

SMM, Your suppositions, based upon the works of others should at least offer footnotes or sources for your conjecture. When speaking in theoretical discussions such as these, it makes it easier to address the points of your assertions. Since you did not do this, you have offered up bait to a discussion that is based purely upon belief with no substance. That has wasted my time, and I consider my time precious. Due to this, I am not afraid to put you on HIDE. I am sure you will not understand, and I am sure that I really do not care whether you understand or not. Have a nice or not nice day, it matters not to me or the rest of the universe whether you do or not.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 7:03:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

SMM, Your suppositions, based upon the works of others should at least offer footnotes or sources for your conjecture. When speaking in theoretical discussions such as these, it makes it easier to address the points of your assertions. Since you did not do this, you have offered up bait to a discussion that is based purely upon belief with no substance. That has wasted my time, and I consider my time precious. Due to this, I am not afraid to put you on HIDE. I am sure you will not understand, and I am sure that I really do not care whether you understand or not. Have a nice or not nice day, it matters not to me or the rest of the universe whether you do or not.
Many wrong assertions there! For example, my family cares about me having a good or bad day. Anyway, ok, mutual hide, it is better so for both :) .




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 10:34:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

SMM, Your suppositions, based upon the works of others should at least offer footnotes or sources for your conjecture. When speaking in theoretical discussions such as these, it makes it easier to address the points of your assertions. Since you did not do this, you have offered up bait to a discussion that is based purely upon belief with no substance. That has wasted my time, and I consider my time precious. Due to this, I am not afraid to put you on HIDE. I am sure you will not understand, and I am sure that I really do not care whether you understand or not. Have a nice or not nice day, it matters not to me or the rest of the universe whether you do or not.


Man o Man....it's looking more and more like SpanishAssHat (mathematically) is going to pretty much blow through ALL of CM within another week or so.




MissImmortalPain -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 10:57:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
@MissImmortalPain: Agreed.


You should think very carefully before agreeing with me. I am not sure you understand what I was pointing out about the way you are choosing to form your thoughts.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 11:48:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain
You should think very carefully before agreeing with me. I am not sure you understand what I was pointing out about the way you are choosing to form your thoughts.
I do not really much care, to say the truth. I do not think that I need to analyse deeply everything people say here, their intentions, motivation, deep and dark desires... hum... ok, back to the subject: I only agreed with your words, that's it. Maybe it is you the one who did not understand something (for example, if you honestly thought that I said, that truth is defined by majority). Who knows. But I agreed with what you said, and that's it. I am leaving this thread... may I suggest that you open a new one if you want to speak about something with me?
Best regards.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 12:41:15 PM)

I said that 2+2=4 is an opinion. I did not say that it is not a fact. What is a "fact" or not, can be decided using different systems. These systems are called "knowledgment systems" (or something similar, I am translating spanish phylosophical (“philosophical”) concepts here, "sistema de conocimiento")….Via Con Dios SpanishAssHat…..

One of this is, for example, evangelical fundamentalism. According to this knowledgment system, God made the Earth in seven days of 24 hours, some thousands of years ago. This is a fact... for this knowledgment system. Well, it’s actually not a fact, indeed, scholars for millennia have debated what the length of the presupposed “day” was in the Bible…but that’s for another discussion entirely…let’s continue….shall we?

Now - when I say that 2+2=4 is a fact, is because I use another knowledgment system (there he is with that “knowledgement” thing again….this must be a special word that only he knows {probably because of his next comment}):, which I call "reason" (and I am not the only one who calls this system in this way, but I am ready to keep this as "my opinion only"), no SpanishAssHat, I too shall now call this “reason”, there will now be two of us here with knowledgement.  I will use this "reason” and I shall make fire! 

According to this system, 2+2=4, and as I trust reason, this is also my opinion. My opinion is, that this is true, that this is a fact. So - it is an opinion. And a fact. For this system.  That is because you stand alone among men and have reason and knowledgement. 

And according to the same system, what I said over Jesus of Nazareth is a fact. (What exactly did you say over Jesus of Nazareth?  I missed that.  Clearly my knowledgment is lacking….at least as best as I can reason) And yes, also my opinion. (What you said over Jesus of Nazareth?) Like that 2+2=4. Ohhhhhhhh…..like that….yeah. 

I hope you understand now my sentence better. With knowledgement SpanishAssHat, comes discernment.  Thanks to you (and reason), I am on my way to a better world.  Thank you for your questions and have a nice day.  You are soooo welcome…and thank you!......for me, the disrespects directed to me are much worse as hiding the messages, which is IMO no disrespect at all. So it is probably only a matter of subjective perception or concept of "respect" (Pure discernment…..and all this….from knowledgment? This is amazing.  It’s opening up new worlds I’d never imagined) .

Still - it is not only a matter of thin or thick skin (and reason...let's not forget reason). It is a matter of utility….no, Grasshopper….It is Knowledgment. I simply do not think that spending time with those people will be useful for them, or for me. This not being an evaluation of this person. Only of the utility of mutual communication. I am sorry if you cannot understand this (I understand you Wing Chou, we are “one” through knowledgment), or you disagree (the fools...infidels), but this is how I see it, ok? :)   Hello again. Well, people can think what they want about me, it is up to them. If they want to check out if this is truly so, they can simply disagree respectfully and see what happens (I believe that is occurring as we speak SpanishAssHat….). Or see what happens when other people do (right now, in "A bit on epistemology", my conversation with Anaxagoras, whom I do not have the slightest intention to "hide"). I am so proud of you, you have mercifully held back.  This is reason beyond any possible known measure.  You show us all how to have knowledgement…I, and many others are in awe, and remain inspired beyond measure.

But if they want to believe that I am not able to debate other points of view, it is really, up to them. I am sorry but I really, really do not care. The power of your debate is unrelenting and teaches me much.  I await, as do many others, the next knlowledgment you may deign to provide.

I am finding myself suddenly full of unexpected mental powers and abilities heretofore unknown to me, all discovered through knowledgment.  I am ready to take this to the next level and surpass the Master....I believe I will now pursue "reasonment".

(I could never have reached these heights without your wise counsel SpanishAssHat...I am forever in your debtment).




FirmhandKY -> RE: Jesus "Christ" today and then. (10/2/2011 1:32:19 PM)

Lookie ... you are so baaaddd!  [:D]

Firm




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
5.859375E-02