Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:23:52 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
I don't know what business you are in or when it was that was "back in the day," but in today's economy with so many people desperate for jobs, that logic simply doesn't apply. Many people who are searching for work get up to an alarm every day and "pound the pavement," whether they do it by getting on their home computer sending out resumes and trying to network or are out on interviews and meeting with headhunters.

The concept that someone who is already employed will make a better employee has one very major flaw. They are looking to jump ship at their current employer and have no loyalty to any company. Job hoppers are constantly looking for the better deal, and that doesn't make them a better employee.

Actually, "job hoppers" are very smart.  On paper, they make for fantastic employees.  They come to work every day, are always on time, and do the job they have been hired to do.  They aren't terribly concerned about the company, but they are very much concerned with their record.  They are exceptionally dependable because they know that is what the next employer will be looking at.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:25:47 PM   
lobodomslavery


Posts: 2477
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
Wonderful i am a job hopper too. So does that not make me a fantastic and indispensable addition to any team, you have to admit Lady Pact, by this suave criteria it most DEFINITELY does
kevin

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:27:42 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Once Rich has been out of work for 6 months or so I bet he'll change his mind.



Well, that's a nice assumption about my character, Ken, but no. The last time I was stubbornly unemployed, and stuck in rotten finacial circumstances, I migrated a thousand miles, to where I could find a decent job.

And what would have happened if that employer had refused to hire you because you were unemployed?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:30:59 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
We have a fair amount of applicants who list consulting positions, perhaps as a work around for listing periods of unemployment. Consulting can be full time plus or almost non-existent. We prefer people who've been working in a corporate environment, with the discipline of coming to work every day.

What I always scan for is job hoppers. If all of their recent positions have been less than two years, it's likely their tenure with us will be short as well.

Short appears to be relative - we recently lost an IT guy who thought his two years with us was a "long time."

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:34:49 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Once Rich has been out of work for 6 months or so I bet he'll change his mind.



Well, that's a nice assumption about my character, Ken, but no. The last time I was stubbornly unemployed, and stuck in rotten finacial circumstances, I migrated a thousand miles, to where I could find a decent job.

And what would have happened if that employer had refused to hire you because you were unemployed?

JMO but if i were said employer, the fact that someone would be willing to move 1,000 miles to take a job with my company would trump him/her being unemployed for 6 months or so... It shows a considerable amount of motivation and very positive, imo.


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:36:34 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Job hoppers are almost continually employed.  They can reference a 1040 (paid working status) ridiculously well.  Remember, I said they look great on PAPER.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:37:26 PM   
lobodomslavery


Posts: 2477
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
No wonder the economy is in the shit when we have employers with caveman attitudes like this. How do you hope to keep a good staff if you only aspire to give incoming incumbents who could make a BIG difference to your company a very short time? Talk about demotivating employees, you have shown a masterclass of this
kevin

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:38:24 PM   
MstrssScarlet


Posts: 633
Joined: 6/3/2005
From: Indianapolis, Indiana
Status: offline
We didn't cause your recession. As you pointed out, we employed people in your country. We still have a free enterprise system and if they aren't making the money they used to, they're still entitled to pack up and move on. Live with it.

As far as who we decide to engage in war with, that's a whole 'nother can of worms. You might as well ask why Northern Ireland keeps fighting with Southern Ireland.

You bore me. You're one of those people who get on here only to rant and rave on the boards with whoever they can engage. Nothing here to see.

Mistress Scarlet

_____________________________

"Say, that hurts a little bit" "And you don't like to be hurt do ya?" "I don't know...kinda fun sometimes if it's done in the right spirit."
Jean Harlow in The Beast of the City

(in reply to lobodomslavery)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:39:49 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

We have a fair amount of applicants who list consulting positions, perhaps as a work around for listing periods of unemployment. Consulting can be full time plus or almost non-existent. We prefer people who've been working in a corporate environment, with the discipline of coming to work every day.

What I always scan for is job hoppers. If all of their recent positions have been less than two years, it's likely their tenure with us will be short as well.

Short appears to be relative - we recently lost an IT guy who thought his two years with us was a "long time."


Exactly. It depends on what you are looking for in an employee. If you are looking for longevity, don't go with a job hopper. Sure, they are concerned about their "record," but they also don't intend to stay with your company longer than necessary to ask for the next better salary.

As for LadyPact's example of a dentist, I don't think it is relevant. We aren't hearing about doctors and dentists who are out of work for long periods of time. Corporate workers and blue collar workers are being downsized and not likely in fields where they can hang their own shingle and work for themselves.

Discrimination in the work place is rampant. There is regular age discrimination. People being discriminated against because they are out of work. Sex discrimination.

There are all kinds of reasons people may have lapses in employment. Women who took time off to raise their children are looked down upon. People who took time off because they had to take care of an ailing family member.

Just because someone has been out of work doesn't equate to them sitting home on the couch eating bon bons and watching soap operas. Most keep up with the current things within their field and stay up on technology that is relevant. I've been out of work due to an injury for several years, and probably won't be able to go back to work soon if at all, yet I still keep up with what is currently taking place in my field, and still can run circles around people who haven't had several years off, but still lack my years of experience.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:42:09 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The way we take care of the unemployed in a free society, as opposed to a nanny-state, Orchid, is by promoting an environment of economic growth and recovery.


Which is directly contrary to your original post.

Conservatives like you bitch and moan about the high unemployment rate then support the idea that the long-term unemployed no longer have the job skills to be hired and you oppose programs that would help them.

How is economic growth and recovery going to help the people you have already deemed as unemployable?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:43:05 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And what would have happened if that employer had refused to hire you because you were unemployed?



I didn't move to "a job," Ken. I moved to an environment where there were "jobs."

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:43:08 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
JMO but if i were said employer, the fact that someone would be willing to move 1,000 miles to take a job with my company would trump him/her being unemployed for 6 months or so... It shows a considerable amount of motivation and very positive, imo.


With this, you're looking at different time frames.  Six months in a highly specialized field is a much different story than a person with no work history for eighteen months/two years time frame.  We're no longer talking about some schlep with your common, every day four year degree.  Now you're talking about somebody with at least that degree and a minimum of five years experience with a company in a specialized job field.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:49:07 PM   
lobodomslavery


Posts: 2477
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
Well you didnt cause it, but the American companies and the American system of the free market letting the market dictate and the American way of laissez faire policy advised to other governments was a significant, no, not significant, decisive factor in causing our recession, not to mention the sub prime mortgage crisis kicked off in America and we are still dealing with the after effects of this shit and will for decades to come. Oh America played a leading part all right. You were the star culprits. As for American companies moving out, no it is not justified if there is no cause for it , ie companies making BIG profits but not as big as heretofore, why should staff who BUILT up these companies deal with it , fuck that, let the company deal with it, they caused the mess, they owe a debt of loyalty to the employee, how dare they take away people's livelihoods, HOW DARE THEY, they may be entitled in law to do this but it does not make it right, they have a nerve, they are despicable and yes the American companies in the mix are despicable, without those workers they would be zilch in profit yet they have the effrontery to turf out those very workers from their jobs and bail out when things get too tough, well if they didnt like the heat they shouldnt have got involved in the first place, another example of how your glorious system of capitalism has utterly FAILED, as for Southern Ireland and Northern Ireland no comparison im afraid, break away groups on both sides perpetrated the violence, nothing to do with government, the difference with Iraq is that it is LEGAL violence perpetrated by government , your wonderful American government
kevin

(in reply to MstrssScarlet)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:51:47 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

A friend said this.   I think it pretty much covers it

A job is where you exchange time/labor/talent for money. Work is where you make the world a better place each day. A career is for those that can do both at the same time. I'm upset that Occupy Wall Street would work at taking the benefit of my job away. They know some of us will still do the work because it makes the worker a better person. But then Occupy Wall Street is against anyone being better than anyone else. So eventually I will have to quit my job to be as miserable as them. Nice plan Occupy Wall Street, if everyone is destitute then there will be a black market in producing goods and services. It seems like I watched a bunch of cold war movies where they were doing that in Russia.


Seems your friend is full of shit.


I second that.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 3:58:52 PM   
MstrssScarlet


Posts: 633
Joined: 6/3/2005
From: Indianapolis, Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

Well you didnt cause it, but the American companies and the American system of the free market letting the market dictate and the American way of laissez faire policy advised to other governments was a significant, no, not significant, decisive factor in causing our recession, not to mention the sub prime mortgage crisis kicked off in America and we are still dealing with the after effects of this shit and will for decades to come. Oh America played a leading part all right. You were the star culprits. As for American companies moving out, no it is not justified if there is no cause for it , ie companies making BIG profits but not as big as heretofore, why should staff who BUILT up these companies deal with it , fuck that, let the company deal with it, they caused the mess, they owe a debt of loyalty to the employee, how dare they take away people's livelihoods, HOW DARE THEY, they may be entitled in law to do this but it does not make it right, they have a nerve, they are despicable and yes the American companies in the mix are despicable, without those workers they would be zilch in profit yet they have the effrontery to turf out those very workers from their jobs and bail out when things get too tough, well if they didnt like the heat they shouldnt have got involved in the first place, another example of how your glorious system of capitalism has utterly FAILED, as for Southern Ireland and Northern Ireland no comparison im afraid, break away groups on both sides perpetrated the violence, nothing to do with government, the difference with Iraq is that it is LEGAL violence perpetrated by government , your wonderful American government
kevin


WaaaWaaa It's alway's America's fault. Like I said, nothing to see here. Rant away.

Mistress Scarlet

_____________________________

"Say, that hurts a little bit" "And you don't like to be hurt do ya?" "I don't know...kinda fun sometimes if it's done in the right spirit."
Jean Harlow in The Beast of the City

(in reply to lobodomslavery)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 4:01:04 PM   
lobodomslavery


Posts: 2477
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
Bottom line is your wonderful American companies should NOT repeat SHOULD NOT EXPECT to make the same profits as heretofore, its a recession stupid, like what do they expect do they expect to make the same and better profits when people have less money and there is high unemployment anyone with even a primary cert could figure out that this is not possible, why cant these numb skulls work it out, but that's the problem the people at the top are imbecilic , they don't understand the world , they don't understand the economy, they don't understand employees and if things aren't going swimmingly like the cowards they are , they simply pull out of business in whatever country they are operating in and turf their employees on to the dole, instead of facing the issues and overcoming them like GREAT BUSINESS PEOPLE, unfortunately they are in VERY SHORT supply, would do
kevin

(in reply to MstrssScarlet)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 4:03:01 PM   
lobodomslavery


Posts: 2477
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
Im not saying its all America's fault , it wasnt America's fault that the European banks were staffed by looneys, but the sub prime mortgage crisis definitely WAS America's fault, it started in America, and we are still dealing with the problems it created and are paying the price big time now
kevin

(in reply to MstrssScarlet)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 4:03:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

The way we take care of the unemployed in a free society, as opposed to a nanny-state, Orchid, is by promoting an environment of economic growth and recovery.


When and how has this occured in the past 235 years?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 4:03:25 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
Exactly. It depends on what you are looking for in an employee. If you are looking for longevity, don't go with a job hopper. Sure, they are concerned about their "record," but they also don't intend to stay with your company longer than necessary to ask for the next better salary.

As for LadyPact's example of a dentist, I don't think it is relevant. We aren't hearing about doctors and dentists who are out of work for long periods of time. Corporate workers and blue collar workers are being downsized and not likely in fields where they can hang their own shingle and work for themselves.

Discrimination in the work place is rampant. There is regular age discrimination. People being discriminated against because they are out of work. Sex discrimination.

There are all kinds of reasons people may have lapses in employment. Women who took time off to raise their children are looked down upon. People who took time off because they had to take care of an ailing family member.

Just because someone has been out of work doesn't equate to them sitting home on the couch eating bon bons and watching soap operas. Most keep up with the current things within their field and stay up on technology that is relevant. I've been out of work due to an injury for several years, and probably won't be able to go back to work soon if at all, yet I still keep up with what is currently taking place in my field, and still can run circles around people who haven't had several years off, but still lack my years of experience.

Most of this, I can agree with.  Let's get past this part about we're talking about those who can at least hang a PhD on their name.  Unless it's some kind of sabbatical, those aren't the people who have been out of work for over a year. 

The days of 'get a job with one company and stay until retirement' are long gone.  Frankly, if I hire somebody in IT and get two years out of them, it's not a bad choice.  I got two solid years.  That's at least a year and a half that I didn't have to pay somebody in training.  I got a return on My investment.  If I got five years, somebody might throw Me a parade.

From the other side of the desk, most people just aren't the awesome employee that they think they are.  That's really what being in HR is about. From the candidates that you have in front of you, choosing the best person for the job.  It's not about caring for the reason they were off on FMLA or any other personal problem that they had.

It is all about that person's potential for being at the right place, at the right time, doing the right job.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias - 10/9/2011 4:06:14 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

Back up the truck love. The US may be sending billions to our country as you say but it also has to share its responsibility for this crushing recession, firstly the US is also spending billions on war, what is that about, the so called search for weapons of mass destruction, which WERE NOT there, and the gargantuan waste of money there, money that it could have used to support job creation and growth and finally the number of US companies that are SELFISHLY closing down in Ireland, despite the fact that some of them ARE continuing to make HEALTHY profits , just not as much as hertofore, some are continuing to make BILLIONS just not as much as hertofore and they use this as justification to render workers REDUNDANT , without jobs, because of their GREED and their INCOMPETENCE in dealing ineffectively with the challenges posed by the recession, so before you shoot from the hip, think about that Ma'am, its not exactly a picture of altruism that you might feel America is giving to other nations, its not, its taking more, US companies are responsible for the fact that millions are now unemployed FACT
kevin


Which raises the question of why the U.S. and its companies are responsible for your economy?

(in reply to lobodomslavery)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Unemployed seek protection against job bias Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.096