Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Caps..not caps..


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Caps..not caps.. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 3:35:13 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Najakcharmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieTooI do think the upper case/ lower case letter beginning a name comes in very handy on the internet.  It's just easier to know immediately who chooses a dominant preference as opposed to who chooses one of submission.


Seriously....why?  So that everyone can immediately start playing D/s roles with them?  So that it's more convenient to shop for a dating, mating or roleplaying partner?  Is there any other legitimate reason that you need to know someone's sexual orientation before engaging in social conversation with them?  Or is it strictly for the purpose of partner-fishing expeditions?


Number one, because we are in a bdsm forum and it's nice to converse and share ideas when you know which perspective they are coming from.  And, yes some people, at some times, *are* looking for partners; which is not unusual, abnormal, or uncommon.  Im not sure what "fishing expeditions" are, and I personally dont play online "Ds roles".  Nor would I necessarily call  dominance and submission "sexual orientations". And no, I dont need to know someone's sexual orientation in order to speak with them. And I do not think knowing whether someone is dominant or submissive has a single thing to do with their sexual orientation.  Sexual orientation would be gay, straight, bisexual, for instance, not dominant or submissive. 
 
PS:  I did notice that you have a profile stating both your sexual orientation as well as your ds preference.  Your post seems a bit incongruent considering your decision to fill in a profile with the very facts that you say we dont need in order to converse.  Just an observation.  :)
 
marie

(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 6:02:47 PM   
Najakcharmer


Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
Number one, because we are in a bdsm forum and it's nice to converse and share ideas when you know which perspective they are coming from.


Ideas, perspective, great.  Immediately jumping into D/s roleplaying with a stranger, not for me thanks.  Just because someone is involved in BDSM does not automatically mean they consent to doing any kind of BDSM with you.  For me, doing BDSM with someone would include things like being called by a special title, speaking or acting in a special way that emphasized our respective roles as dominant and submissive, etc.


quote:

And, yes some people, at some times, *are* looking for partners; which is not unusual, abnormal, or uncommon.  Im not sure what "fishing expeditions" are, and I personally dont play online "Ds roles". 


There's certainly nothing wrong with seeking a partner.  There's also nothing wrong with *not* seeking a partner, but just wanting to make friends and share ideas in the BDSM community without feeling like you're on display in a meat market. 


quote:

Nor would I necessarily call  dominance and submission "sexual orientations". And no, I dont need to know someone's sexual orientation in order to speak with them. And I do not think knowing whether someone is dominant or submissive has a single thing to do with their sexual orientation.  Sexual orientation would be gay, straight, bisexual, for instance, not dominant or submissive.


If you don't need to know someone's sexual orientation in order to speak to them, why would you necesarily need to know their D/s orientation?  I'm honestly curious here.  I really don't know why it would be relevant to a casual social interaction.
 
quote:

I did notice that you have a profile stating both your sexual orientation as well as your ds preference.  Your post seems a bit incongruent considering your decision to fill in a profile with the very facts that you say we dont need in order to converse.  Just an observation.  :)



If folks are curious enough to want to know a little more about me, I certainly don't mind sharing that information as part of a profile that talks fairly extensively about who I am as a person, my interests, my goals in life, etc.  What I won't do is share it right up front as the sole basis for an interaction with someone.  I don't want my D/s orientation to be the single thing that someone knows about me, or even the most important thing.



(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 6:36:52 PM   
spectreandnectre


Posts: 401
Joined: 3/20/2006
From: nebraska
Status: offline
In my three plus years online communicating i have always capitalized all words pertaining to a Dom/me and have always made sure all sub/slaves were not i dont even cap an i at the beginning of a sentence referring to myself.
i have found that most Masters and Mistresses dont mind but it is still my habit for the most part.

_____________________________

"When I see you, the world stops as if the only purpose in life was for me to please you."

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 9:52:14 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Najakcharmer


Ideas, perspective, great.  Immediately jumping into D/s roleplaying with a stranger, not for me thanks.  Just because someone is involved in BDSM does not automatically mean they consent to doing any kind of BDSM with you.  For me, doing BDSM with someone would include things like being called by a special title, speaking or acting in a special way that emphasized our respective roles as dominant and submissive, etc.

I dont think that using a lower case and uppercase to differentiate between those of a dominant nature and those of a submissive nature is entering into "D.s roleplaying with a stranger". 


There's certainly nothing wrong with seeking a partner.  There's also nothing wrong with *not* seeking a partner, but just wanting to make friends and share ideas in the BDSM community without feeling like you're on display in a meat market. 

"Sharing ideas in a BDSM community" without addressing who is dom and who is sub?  Its relevant to sharing ideas.  And if someone treats me like a piece of meat in a meat market, I simply do not associate with them. Mail blocking works great for that.  Any trollers are instantly blocked. 


If you don't need to know someone's sexual orientation in order to speak to them, why would you necesarily need to know their D/s orientation?  I'm honestly curious here.  I really don't know why it would be relevant to a casual social interaction.

It isn't relevant to *casual social interaction*, which is what I have all the time with non-bdsmers.  But that isn't what goes on here for the most part, or in bdsm chats. Its usually bdsm related topics. And as I said, its nice to know where everyone stands as far as their "preference", it sort of ties all the comments and posts together and someones comments make more sense when you know which view point (D or S) they are coming from. 


If folks are curious enough to want to know a little more about me, I certainly don't mind sharing that information as part of a profile that talks fairly extensively about who I am as a person, my interests, my goals in life, etc.  What I won't do is share it right up front as the sole basis for an interaction with someone.  I don't want my D/s orientation to be the single thing that someone knows about me, or even the most important thing.

Its not the sole basis that someone speaks to you, especially not out in every day life.  But this is a BDSM site and you are a member on it.  This is the place where we *can* self-identify as what we are in regards to our DS orientations. I dont see why you take offense to being recognized for your ds preferences on a ds site. Its like going to a golf club and no one talking about golf because they don't want to be defined by the fact that they're golfers. 

(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 10:24:12 PM   
candystripper


Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

It's something I've done for years and is a matter of habbit (or was that a matter of hobbit?). generally I'd rather err on the side of over politness unless I want to iunsult someone or at least show my lack of GaS.

_____________________________

Be Well
Iron Bear

Master of House Iron Bear


The Incorrigible, Irrepressible, Irreverent Grizzly



East Coast Aussie Goreans
 
~tries wiggling my butt at IronBear again~
 
Message boards, Yahoo IM and chat rooms are all mediums in which nothing can be heard (in general; some chat rooms have voice and music) and only O/one's written words can be used to communicate.  For me, the use of Caps on a Dom/me's nick is simply respectful,and i cannot quite understand why some Dom/mes do not use Caps or at least nicks that convey Their place.  (Btw, submissives/slaves who use caps on their nicks also confuse me, as it would seem to reduce the potential for a Dom/me to approach.)
 
i also prefer the use of Y/you messages because it seems respectful to me and if i mean to include "all y'all" i know Y/you does the trick.
 
It never ceases to amaze me that P/pl who choose to do otherwise get T/their undies in a bunch over how *i* choose to type.  A/anyone with an 8th grade education can read and understand my posts, IM's and chat room messages...so wtf is the problem?  i never see P/pl who choose to use "Y/you" bashing those W/who do not.  
 
What a damned silly thing to seek --- uselessly --to stamp out.  i'm a perv, a submissive, and i like/prefer/want/etc to remind myself and E/everyone else of that through my messages.  It's something that makes me happy; if it doesn't float Y/your boat, don't do it.  i have no doubt W/we will continue, stumbling along, to communicate with O/one A/another nonetheless.
 
candystripper 
 
 

 


< Message edited by candystripper -- 5/25/2006 10:27:18 PM >

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/25/2006 10:30:25 PM   
genvieve


Posts: 228
Joined: 5/14/2005
From: SF Bay Area
Status: offline
i approach the matter just like any other courtesy.  When in Rome...do as Romans do.  The fact of the matter is, i have never run into a Dominant who was offended by my Capping Him or Her... they may correct me after the intial meeting and make me aware of His or Her preference. 
 
But on the whole... i cap Dominants and lower submissives...
 
In contrast, when chatting... if my name is capped, i respectfully ask them to lower it.  "i earned muh lower case typing" as i like to put it.

_____________________________

In the quietness of myself, i find myself at the mercy of Your hand.

Musical Wishes Design

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 12:18:23 AM   
Najakcharmer


Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper
For me, the use of Caps on a Dom/me's nick is simply respectful,and i cannot quite understand why some Dom/mes do not use Caps or at least nicks that convey Their place.  (Btw, submissives/slaves who use caps on their nicks also confuse me, as it would seem to reduce the potential for a Dom/me to approach.)


"Respect" that I have not earned, "respect" that is given to me by a stranger just because I identify as a dominant, is not desirable to me in the least.  It honestly doesn't feel like "respect" to me.  It feels like meaningless game playing that I don't want to participate in. 

Not everyone wants to be "approached".  Some folks already have a pretty full dance card, and just want to socialize in a friendly way with others in the community.


quote:

It never ceases to amaze me that P/pl who choose to do otherwise get T/their undies in a bunch over how *i* choose to type.  A/anyone with an 8th grade education can read and understand my posts, IM's and chat room messages...so wtf is the problem?  i never see P/pl who choose to use "Y/you" bashing those W/who do not. 


You can choose to type any way you want.  I can choose to block, ignore and delete people whom I think are annoying or silly because they don't want to talk to me like normal adults outside of their role. 

 
quote:

What a damned silly thing to seek --- uselessly --to stamp out.  i'm a perv, a submissive, and i like/prefer/want/etc to remind myself and E/everyone else of that through my messages.  It's something that makes me happy; if it doesn't float Y/your boat, don't do it.  i have no doubt W/we will continue, stumbling along, to communicate with O/one A/another nonetheless.


To stamp out?  No.  I don't care what you do with other consenting adults who want to act out their D/s roles by using weird capitalization, titles, etc.  I just don't give my personal consent to participate.  If someone really does not want to talk to me in a friendly way outside of role, then they can easily go find someone else to talk to who does consent to play those games.  Last I checked, consent and limits were actually supposed to mean something in the BDSM community.  You get to do what you want with your consenting partners, and I get to say what I do and don't consent to for myself. 
 

(in reply to candystripper)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 12:33:06 AM   
candystripper


Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

To stamp out?  No.  I don't care what you do with other consenting adults who want to act out their D/s roles by using weird capitalization, titles, etc.  I just don't give my personal consent to participate.  If someone really does not want to talk to me in a friendly way outside of role, then they can easily go find someone else to talk to who does consent to play those games.  Last I checked, consent and limits were actually supposed to mean something in the BDSM community.  You get to do what you want with your consenting partners, and I get to say what I do and don't consent to for myself. 

Najakcharmer
 

Well, i do not have "partners" but i take Your point, Ma'am.
 
candystripper
 

(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 3:32:03 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: talibahh

ooo... i love Joe Pesci... now He makes me laugh... just like You did Level... and You're welcome for the kind words... and i see You're still up... when You gonna sleep?
 
tali


I'm glad I made you laugh .... and I just finished sleeping... but I plan on doing it again tonight hehheh.

(in reply to talibahh)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 4:16:45 AM   
cynthiamarie


Posts: 205
Joined: 3/11/2005
From: Bluefield, WV, USA
Status: offline
Hm, these discussions certainly get heated, don't they?  Reminds me of the chatroom lobby. *smiles*
 
Time for me to toss in my own two cents...
Quote from Najakcharmer:
"There's certainly nothing wrong with seeking a partner.  There's also nothing wrong with *not* seeking a partner, but just wanting to make friends and share ideas in the BDSM community without feeling like you're on display in a meat market."
Sometimes I've come here merely to chat with friends, and other times to be seen because I was looking for an eventual partner.  I've enjoyed making friends and enjoy good (and sometimes heated) conversations and debates, but...when I come to a site where people meet for partners, I expect to be treated like meat by some.  This is where some manners training in pm can be appropriate, and done politely...or we can always choose to do a quick iggy to be left in peace.  To each his own, and I respect your choice in how you deal with it. 
 
As much as I dislike the vanillas who soak their minds in BDSM porn, maybe because they've already gone through all the vanilla porn and are bored, and then come here and try to force every female, whether Domme or sub, to roleplay/cyber with them...there are others who have only found another way to express some of what is in their souls...and I can't reprimand them for it.  If someone refers to me as You or Ma'am, it doesn't bother me any more than being called Ms. in my vanilla life.  In vanilla, I'm a Ms., not a Mr., and I also have a designation in D/s.  (So okay, I can feel both sides so technically I'm a switch but...grins...I am NOT exploring my subbie side at the present time.)
 
I don't prefer all the cap changing, but taking my time to read something like W/we, Y/you, A/all, O/our isn't that much of an effort...and it's a bit of a challenge.  Challenges don't bother me, and I have a lot of patience. 
 
When someone addresses me as Mistress, I gently explain IN PRIVATE what my preferences are...my name, or Ma'am, and I explain why.  I make exceptions for Gorean slaves, and yes, I ask. 
 
I am not as sensitive as some to power exchange, evidently, because most people who defer to me do not increase any Dominant (it is my preference to cap that word to give it a lifestyle definition in my own mind) feelings of my own.  It takes a special submissive, with whom I feel some kind of rapport before that happens.  Maybe I watched too many Hollywood movies as a child, but...hm...going into someone's house over 100 years ago and experiencing the friends' servants waiting on me and referring to me in polite honorifics would not make me feel like they were MINE.  I could enjoy their services without feeling intimacy as well. 
 
In the past, I've had to refer to teachers and others as Sir or Ma'am; it was a polite interaction that reminded each of us of our proper place and did not feel like an intimacy.  Each person in the chatroom is a stranger to me until they get to know me better and we have a chance to become friends or more, so pm's with someone greeting me as Goddess or Mistress with them dropping on the floor at my feet sometimes offends me or makes me laugh to myself...but I'm polite to them and explain that what they are doing is roleplay, and that it's too intimate for me to do with just everyone.  I want to have a real conversation to get to know them. 
 
Feeling Dominant or submissive toward someone is a very intimate, bonding thing for me, and if someone else's Dominant feelings are triggered by any submissive living out their role in life then I could see how it could feel like an invasion.  I try to keep my feelings under control as well, and will avoid online chat if I go into frenzy...but those are usually provoked by IM's with people I'm very attracted to, not ever by chatroom lobby antics or random pm's. 
 
The many signals submissives and Dom/mes give out online, including capping and rituals, remind me of other signals people give out in r/t to size each other up and attract mates; perfumes, colognes, hair styles, body language, tone of voice, and the choice of clothing to tell the world "this is who I am."  I size up friends and acquaintences daily, without conscious thought, and it's part of who I am.  I know what's mine and what isn't.
 
Some are wankers, I won't argue about that, lol.  But many are just new and nervous and trying to be what they think everyone expects them to be...and they're a delight once we get to know them and get them to relax and open up.  The wankers/HNG's either leave soon or throw an easily dealt with tantrum when they don't get what they want.  No big deal; if I could outlast my own child during r/t tantrums, I can certainly deal with pouting wankers.
 
I started off here as a sub...very innocent and just incredulous that I finally had words to express what I was feeling.  I delighted in capping some things to both show generic respect (same as I would give an honorific to a President or to a king, even if I disrespected him, just pecause I respected the position he holds), and to advertise who I was so there would be no confusion...and it opened non-sexual gates to feelings I needed to learn to deal with and understand better.  It also drew many sweet, daddy/uncle type Doms who watched over me like I was a little kid, and gave me pm's with sites like Castlerealm.  I had a safety net and kindness because I called them "You".
 
In the lobby, I signal that I'm Domme by altering my name to CynthiaMarie.  Doms respect this and do not hit on me...it saves me time that I don't have to tell them my orientation and that I'm not interested in them other than as a friend.  Too bad being in small letters didn't have the same effect on the deluge of male subs I used to have to brush off. 
 
This past year something happened to me, and I understand the teachings of my mentor better...it's part of my instincts now; when I see a sub in trouble...if I can see them, they're in my "territory"...I take on the responsibility of helping or protecting them if I can; to educate them about safety, safe words, safe calls, and studying enough about BDSM play they might be wading into soon so they will know when to safeword.  So...like it or not, and even if no other Dom/me will admit to feeling this way...lowercase typing by submissives affects me in the same way that lowered eyes, emotionally provoked stuttering, bared neck, blushing, etc. affect me r/t.   
 
The diversity of beliefs I've found here has forced me to learn more about the beliefs of many different subcultures within D/s, and I'm grateful for that.  I also learned that with a little patience I can actually read through all the W/we, Y/you, A/all, U/us and understand the full layers of meanings someone is trying to express.  How can I complain, when the times I see it used to show unity and pride a Dominant/submissive couple have in each other just melts me into a puddle?  The subs wear their new collars like new brides wear their wedding rings, and their Dominants...*wide grin*.  I would rather have these couples here, annoying the heck out of some of us, rather than going silent while they're in their honeymoon phase or discovering that their circle is complete and they don't need their internet friends anymore. 
 
Btw, I'm glad that not everyone's ways are my own...it allows me a private arrogance to believe that mine are better.


 


< Message edited by cynthiamarie -- 5/26/2006 4:20:39 AM >

(in reply to candystripper)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 10:34:20 AM   
Najakcharmer


Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cynthiamarie
I started off here as a sub...very innocent and just incredulous that I finally had words to express what I was feeling.  I delighted in capping some things to both show generic respect (same as I would give an honorific to a President or to a king, even if I disrespected him, just pecause I respected the position he holds), and to advertise who I was so there would be no confusion...and it opened non-sexual gates to feelings I needed to learn to deal with and understand better.  It also drew many sweet, daddy/uncle type Doms who watched over me like I was a little kid, and gave me pm's with sites like Castlerealm.  I had a safety net and kindness because I called them "You".


Yes, it can work that way, as you describe so well here.  Doms get their buttons pushed by that kind of thing.  It works, or people wouldn't be doing it.


quote:

This past year something happened to me, and I understand the teachings of my mentor better...it's part of my instincts now; when I see a sub in trouble...if I can see them, they're in my "territory"...I take on the responsibility of helping or protecting them if I can; to educate them about safety, safe words, safe calls, and studying enough about BDSM play they might be wading into soon so they will know when to safeword.  So...like it or not, and even if no other Dom/me will admit to feeling this way...lowercase typing by submissives affects me in the same way that lowered eyes, emotionally provoked stuttering, bared neck, blushing, etc. affect me r/t.


You hit the nail right on the head for me.  That is specifically why I don't want strangers whom I don't know or trust pushing my "dom buttons".  It's not a comfortable situation for me.


quote:

The diversity of beliefs I've found here has forced me to learn more about the beliefs of many different subcultures within D/s, and I'm grateful for that.  I also learned that with a little patience I can actually read through all the W/we, Y/you, A/all, U/us and understand the full layers of meanings someone is trying to express.  How can I complain, when the times I see it used to show unity and pride a Dominant/submissive couple have in each other just melts me into a puddle?  The subs wear their new collars like new brides wear their wedding rings, and their Dominants...*wide grin*.  I would rather have these couples here, annoying the heck out of some of us, rather than going silent while they're in their honeymoon phase or discovering that their circle is complete and they don't need their internet friends anymore. 


Excellently well phrased. 

I certainly don't want to keep people from enjoying themselves all they want with their consenting partners.  They should be able to joyfully dance the macarena on a crowded floor with the entire room if they want to.  I just can't join that particular dance, and I prefer to relax in the corner with a drink until there's a slow waltz and a single well-chosen partner.  Just as when I'm attending play parties in real life, I certainly don't mind watching others have their fun, but if someone tries to make me actively participate in a scene without my consent being asked first, I'm going to be mightily annoyed.


(in reply to cynthiamarie)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 11:29:53 AM   
Ciepher


Posts: 2
Status: offline
I will always err on the side of grammar and type slave's names with capitals and type words like she, he, them, etc. without. If someone really did make a fuss about it, then I might use wacky caps to refer to them if they were a friend.

The exception would be in chatrooms where the custom is to lower case slave's names for the sake of identifying who's who.

(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 3:57:01 PM   
DragonDiver


Posts: 10
Joined: 8/25/2004
Status: offline
Master, Dom, Top, Slave, Sub, Bottom these are titles and therefore proper nouns so capitalized. I understand where Lady Hugs (greetings by the way*) and others who err on the side of common courtesy and basically 'When in Rome do as the R/romans do'. Yet I find that we already have enough problems communicating with each other as it is with this inexact language called English. Such as dominant is an adjective not a noun (unless used in musical notation) and domme is not even a word. plus we have bastardize the language so bad that when we use the word Dominatrix it means in the common understanding a professional. So I offer a more precise and exacting language by going back to our roots:
Latin.
Dominus: -i m. [master of a house , lord, master]. Transf., [husband or lover; a master, owner, possessor; employer; ruler, lord, controller].
Domina: -ae f. [mistress of a household; wife , mistress, lady]; of abstr. things, [ruler, controller].
Dominatrix: -icis f. [a female ruler , mistress].
Domitrix: -icis f. [she who tames].
Dominator: -oris m. [ruler , governor].
So to all my fellow Dominus and Domina, to all those Dominatrix and Domitrix from this humble Dominator, I bid you adieu.
 
(*Lady hugs I met you at the 2005 Master/Slave conference in DC and you were also at our event SWLC I recall)
Master Dennis Read as Dominus Dennis  {Very strange to see vanilla under my moniker...strange indeed!!}
 
"Mastery begins, where the ego ends!" - Master Dennis
 
"Mastery is the study into constant motion,
from the motion of change and adaption
to the motion of quiet introspection.
it is a journey, my friends,
not a destination.
Happy trails to you!"
-Master Dennis


< Message edited by DragonDiver -- 5/26/2006 4:01:44 PM >

(in reply to Ciepher)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 7:56:48 PM   
cynthiamarie


Posts: 205
Joined: 3/11/2005
From: Bluefield, WV, USA
Status: offline
"Such as dominant is an adjective not a noun (unless used in musical notation) and domme is not even a word. plus we have bastardize the language so bad that when we use the word Dominatrix it means in the common understanding a professional."

Hm, Latin is the only dead language used at this present time that I know of...it never changes as other languages do, from new words being invented and slang. 
 
 *Looks in her very old dictionary and doesn't see "internet" as being a noun either, and is surprised that she can't see "shit" (gosh, that's not a noun?) nor "fuck" (verb, right?) nor "asshole" (I swear I thought that was a noun too) either. 
 
A language has to grow to fill the needs of the people using it...to myself and many others, Domme is a noun as well as a title...hm, my dictionary also lists President...as a noun.  If someone can be a President and the word be a noun and not an adjective, then Doms, Dommes, Switches, Tops, Bottoms, whatever should also be considered nouns when they are used as nouns, and not be considered adjectives unless used as adjectives, as in...a dominant personality.  *Is reminded that verbs can become nouns too, when used as gerunds.*
 
Homeschool isn't in my dictionary either, but that word was coined decades ago and sooner or later the dictionaries are going to have to give it recognition, because there are many of us homeschoolers out there.  Taking complete responsibility for our children's education is different from homebound schooling (as when a pregnant or sick teen is sent a teacher 2 or 3 days per week, and the public school is responsible for the child's education), and from schooling programs like the one in Ohio that sends the child home with a computer and they do their schooling online to public school teachers.  Sometimes bastardizing the language creates better clarity, instead of chaos.
 
Um...I can't resist looking at the King James Version of my Bible...never once did I see the words refrigerator or microwave or automobile, and I bet the earlier dictionaries of that time didn't have those words either.  I enjoy the "bastardization" of the language I speak...I wouldn't want to have to talk with a language that couldn't stretch itself to change with the times.
 
Many languages contributed to modern day American English, not just Latin.  It's been a huge melting pot of languages, as I learned when I tutored ESL college students who were trying to learn it.   
 
I like the word Domina, but I prefer Domme and pronounce it as "dom", with the silent "e" on the end to clue someone in that I'm referring to a female Dominant.  I don't like Latin back-to-basics words like Dominator, because it reminds me of times when slavery isn't consensual, and NOT part of D/s.  We deserve our own words or phrases to set our lifestyle apart from tyrants who ruled without consent, by "divine right."
 
It would be nice if the community got it's act together to decide which words would go into any enlightened future dictionary, but there might be too many preferences within the diverse groups under the BDSM umbrella to ever do so. 
 
I wonder how many years does it take before a newly coined word, used by thousands of people daily, year after year, finally is acknowledged in a dictionary?  Now I wonder, how long ago since someone coined the title, Domme?  At least switch is in the dictionary, and if it's used one way, it's a noun, and in another it's a verb...but I'm not some doohickey on a wall that controls whether electricity turns on a light or not. *grins*
 
I do not disrespect anyone here for their own beliefs or pet peeves...it's been fun expressing my own.

(in reply to DragonDiver)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 8:38:15 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Uhhh, that would be "To all my fellow Domini and Dominae, to all those Dominatrices and Domitrices ..."  You have to do more than just look up words in a dictionary; you have to know how to use them, too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DragonDiver

So to all my fellow Dominus and Domina, to all those Dominatrix and Domitrix from this humble Dominator, I bid you adieu.

(in reply to DragonDiver)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 10:12:23 PM   
candystripper


Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Hm, these discussions certainly get heated, don't they?  Reminds me of the chatroom lobby. *smiles*

 
Time for me to toss in my own two cents...
Quote from Najakcharmer:
"There's certainly nothing wrong with seeking a partner.  There's also nothing wrong with *not* seeking a partner, but just wanting to make friends and share ideas in the BDSM community without feeling like you're on display in a meat market."
Sometimes I've come here merely to chat with friends, and other times to be seen because I was looking for an eventual partner.  I've enjoyed making friends and enjoy good (and sometimes heated) conversations and debates, but...when I come to a site where people meet for partners, I expect to be treated like meat by some.  This is where some manners training in pm can be appropriate, and done politely...or we can always choose to do a quick iggy to be left in peace.  To each his own, and I respect your choice in how you deal with it. 
 
As much as I dislike the vanillas who soak their minds in BDSM porn, maybe because they've already gone through all the vanilla porn and are bored, and then come here and try to force every female, whether Domme or sub, to roleplay/cyber with them...there are others who have only found another way to express some of what is in their souls...and I can't reprimand them for it.  If someone refers to me as You or Ma'am, it doesn't bother me any more than being called Ms. in my vanilla life.  In vanilla, I'm a Ms., not a Mr., and I also have a designation in D/s.  (So okay, I can feel both sides so technically I'm a switch but...grins...I am NOT exploring my subbie side at the present time.)
 
I don't prefer all the cap changing, but taking my time to read something like W/we, Y/you, A/all, O/our isn't that much of an effort...and it's a bit of a challenge.  Challenges don't bother me, and I have a lot of patience. 
 
When someone addresses me as Mistress, I gently explain IN PRIVATE what my preferences are...my name, or Ma'am, and I explain why.  I make exceptions for Gorean slaves, and yes, I ask. 
 
I am not as sensitive as some to power exchange, evidently, because most people who defer to me do not increase any Dominant (it is my preference to cap that word to give it a lifestyle definition in my own mind) feelings of my own.  It takes a special submissive, with whom I feel some kind of rapport before that happens.  Maybe I watched too many Hollywood movies as a child, but...hm...going into someone's house over 100 years ago and experiencing the friends' servants waiting on me and referring to me in polite honorifics would not make me feel like they were MINE.  I could enjoy their services without feeling intimacy as well. 
 
In the past, I've had to refer to teachers and others as Sir or Ma'am; it was a polite interaction that reminded each of us of our proper place and did not feel like an intimacy.  Each person in the chatroom is a stranger to me until they get to know me better and we have a chance to become friends or more, so pm's with someone greeting me as Goddess or Mistress with them dropping on the floor at my feet sometimes offends me or makes me laugh to myself...but I'm polite to them and explain that what they are doing is roleplay, and that it's too intimate for me to do with just everyone.  I want to have a real conversation to get to know them. 
 
Feeling Dominant or submissive toward someone is a very intimate, bonding thing for me, and if someone else's Dominant feelings are triggered by any submissive living out their role in life then I could see how it could feel like an invasion.  I try to keep my feelings under control as well, and will avoid online chat if I go into frenzy...but those are usually provoked by IM's with people I'm very attracted to, not ever by chatroom lobby antics or random pm's. 
 
The many signals submissives and Dom/mes give out online, including capping and rituals, remind me of other signals people give out in r/t to size each other up and attract mates; perfumes, colognes, hair styles, body language, tone of voice, and the choice of clothing to tell the world "this is who I am."  I size up friends and acquaintences daily, without conscious thought, and it's part of who I am.  I know what's mine and what isn't.
 
Some are wankers, I won't argue about that, lol.  But many are just new and nervous and trying to be what they think everyone expects them to be...and they're a delight once we get to know them and get them to relax and open up.  The wankers/HNG's either leave soon or throw an easily dealt with tantrum when they don't get what they want.  No big deal; if I could outlast my own child during r/t tantrums, I can certainly deal with pouting wankers.
 
I started off here as a sub...very innocent and just incredulous that I finally had words to express what I was feeling.  I delighted in capping some things to both show generic respect (same as I would give an honorific to a President or to a king, even if I disrespected him, just pecause I respected the position he holds), and to advertise who I was so there would be no confusion...and it opened non-sexual gates to feelings I needed to learn to deal with and understand better.  It also drew many sweet, daddy/uncle type Doms who watched over me like I was a little kid, and gave me pm's with sites like Castlerealm.  I had a safety net and kindness because I called them "You".
 
In the lobby, I signal that I'm Domme by altering my name to CynthiaMarie.  Doms respect this and do not hit on me...it saves me time that I don't have to tell them my orientation and that I'm not interested in them other than as a friend.  Too bad being in small letters didn't have the same effect on the deluge of male subs I used to have to brush off. 
 
This past year something happened to me, and I understand the teachings of my mentor better...it's part of my instincts now; when I see a sub in trouble...if I can see them, they're in my "territory"...I take on the responsibility of helping or protecting them if I can; to educate them about safety, safe words, safe calls, and studying enough about BDSM play they might be wading into soon so they will know when to safeword.  So...like it or not, and even if no other Dom/me will admit to feeling this way...lowercase typing by submissives affects me in the same way that lowered eyes, emotionally provoked stuttering, bared neck, blushing, etc. affect me r/t.   
 
The diversity of beliefs I've found here has forced me to learn more about the beliefs of many different subcultures within D/s, and I'm grateful for that.  I also learned that with a little patience I can actually read through all the W/we, Y/you, A/all, U/us and understand the full layers of meanings someone is trying to express.  How can I complain, when the times I see it used to show unity and pride a Dominant/submissive couple have in each other just melts me into a puddle?  The subs wear their new collars like new brides wear their wedding rings, and their Dominants...*wide grin*.  I would rather have these couples here, annoying the heck out of some of us, rather than going silent while they're in their honeymoon phase or discovering that their circle is complete and they don't need their internet friends anymore. 
 
Btw, I'm glad that not everyone's ways are my own...it allows me a private arrogance to believe that mine are better.

cynthiamarie


What an outstanding post Cynthia Marie/cynthia marie.  TY so much.  i know i'll be re-reading it and digesting it better again and again.
 
candystripper

< Message edited by candystripper -- 5/26/2006 10:13:32 PM >

(in reply to cynthiamarie)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Caps..not caps.. - 5/26/2006 11:26:41 PM   
DragonDiver


Posts: 10
Joined: 8/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Uhhh, that would be "To all my fellow Domini and Dominae, to all those Dominatrices and Domitrices ..."  You have to do more than just look up words in a dictionary; you have to know how to use them, too.


yes you are correct my Latin is not all that great nor is it my forte, did not wish to add more confusion to the pile than I already had... but again thank you for the correction.

quote:

*Looks in her very old dictionary and doesn't see "internet" as being a noun either, and is surprised that she can't see "shit" (gosh, that's not a noun?) nor "fuck" (verb, right?) nor "asshole" (I swear I thought that was a noun too) either. 

LOL they are in mine and it is not that new. I agree that new words in the language do make for a living language. I do not wish to return to the dead ones like Latin nor ancient Greek, it was mentioned because those dead as they may be were very exact compared to their newer versions utilized today, English being one of them. I agree it would be nice to have a more precise verbiage for our lifestyle, it would help us understand each other better. Yet there are many differences in terms even from one locale to another on the West coast we play on the East they work. Edge play to some is pushing limits to others they think blades.   I was responding to the question in my own manner and throwing a bit of fuel on the fire... Caps or no caps... I prefer to just speak/type in English... I can also get through all of the C/capitals and L/lower C/case W/writing, B/but I/i A/ask W/why it is no longer a valid reason for it. with the advent of profiles, it is a beast of the past as well as the Latin. the opinion expressed was my own and not to be taken as the only way intent. I just have seen to many online who feel that those who use lower case are lower caste and the use of the C/caps formula I see as a out dated and enabler of such ideas for those who are new to this life.
Take what you like and leave what you don't.
Adieu and be well
M. Dennis

(in reply to candystripper)
Profile   Post #: 77
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Caps..not caps.. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094