|
rulemylife -> RE: LMAO. Oblama claims victory for diplomatic embarassment (10/22/2011 3:22:01 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Wilbur, Your sense of the ridiculous is obvious for all to see. Almost every article I have read by US commanders says the same as Hillwilliam.
Bush`s foray into iraq looking for WMD`s (unfound weapons of much distraction) led to the Taliban neing able to regroup and regain a foothold in Afghanistan. Now a question for you. If it was reversed, as you laughingly suggest, then wtf did Bush go after Bin Laden and not just drive straight to Baghdad ?
if you can be arsed to do a check, which you wont, most of those to the left of you posted all along that Bush was right to invade afghanistan and not Iraq, and here you are suggesting the opposite. It is no wonder your posts get ridiculed.
Every military analyst said that if bin Laden went to ground in the caves of Afghanistan there would be no way to extract him without tremendous loss of lives. It was a fucking waste of time from day one.
Then why didn't those military analysts tell this guy before he invaded Afghanistan?
USATODAY.com - Bush pledges to get bin Laden, dead or alive
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive," no matter how long it takes, amid indications that the suspected terrorist may be bottled up in a rugged Afghan canyon. The president, in an Oval Office meeting with Thailand's prime minister, would not predict the timing of bin Laden's capture but said he doesn't care how the suspect is brought to justice. "I don't care, dead or alive — either way," Bush said. "It doesn't matter to me."
And while we are talking about it, how is that Obama managed to do, in his short time in office, what the tough-talking pretend cowboy could not accomplish in eight years?
|
|
|
|
