LillyBoPeep
Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010 Status: offline
|
hooray for discussion threads with different perspectives! these are the kinds of discussion threads i enjoy. ^_^ quote:
ORIGINAL: oneluckysub Very thought provoking question you pose Lilly. I have thought that topping would be an expression of dominance but some of the responses here have made me think that maybe it is just an activity that is part of my relationships. I see my Dom (when I am with one) as the decision maker, authority figure that others will divert to when we are together. I am more of the care giver, non aggressive, laid back, get things done in the background sort of person. i generally consider topping to be an extension of domination; i guess i'm more the type of s-person who does seek out more "all-encompassing, force-that-can-not-be-denied" sort of domination. maybe it's stereotypical, but i don't really want fluidity. and that, to me, isn't about not allowing a dude to be soft; if he doesn't want to be a hardass, but instead wants me to cuddle with him or console him when he's upset, that would definitely never change my opinion of him. i prefer men who are comfortable expressing every facet of who they are as human beings. if you can't feel like you can open up and cry in front of me when your mother dies, then maybe i'm doing something wrong. =p to me, i'm there to make his life better and easier. (that was referencing another post, not necessarily yours, oneluckysub -- just a thought i was having.) quote:
ORIGINAL: oneluckysub When I am not in private settings with my Dom, I am think of myself as an equal partner with my Dom (but one who thinks of and puts her Dom before anyone else). I have a career and a personal life outside of my relationship and in issues outside of the relationship, I make those decisions on my own. In household decisions in the relationship, I have an equal voice in those decisions. i don't necessarily think of myself as equal in the relationship. i have equal intrinsic worth -- like if i have a heart attack, the ambulance should come just as fast as if he has a heart attack. =p the relationship can't exist without either party, so in that sense, we have equal value to the relationship. but i also think that being unequal and having a 24/7 relationship doesn't mean that you don't have a voice. like my previous Dude thought i had good opinions and liked to listen to them. he'd have me research stuff and then tell him what i thought about it. he liked someone to bounce ideas off of -- it didn't change the fact that he was the Leader, and he wasn't so interested in controlling my life, like picking out classes and such -- but we had very similar goals for the future, so we were both working together towards that one future. i guess, for us, we were each other's lives. we were sailing together and he was the Captain. quote:
ORIGINAL: oneluckysub Sexually, my vanilla relationships have been 50/50 in who does what and how. When doing BDSM activities, I am more of receiver than the active doer. Not to say that I just lay there but when bound and hooded, there is not much more I can do! And no, not being the Lazy Lay either. (Thanks for that Lockit - it made me chuckle). this is a good point to make. =p when you're tied up and restrained, there's not a whole lot you can do, and for a lot of Male Doms -- that's the entire point! it's not about you as a sub/bottom being lazy, it's about them tying you down because they don't want you squirming around while they do horrible things to you. haha =p
< Message edited by LillyBoPeep -- 11/2/2011 9:41:07 AM >
_____________________________
Midwestern Girl "Obey your Master." Metallica
|