"We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DarqueMirror -> "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/3/2011 8:20:01 PM)

quote:

And in addition to the bad publicity, the protesters said there are people who have been taking advantage of the movement by sleeping in donated tents and eating donated food.

“I know we’re supposed to be helping the 99 percent, but they need to help us help them by not being a drain on our resources,” said Otto Wagner.


http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/110311-occupy-dallas-to-relocated%2C-regroup

How ironic. They're supposedly protesting income inequality (or whatever the claim is this week) but they can't use *donated* food and tents to help people who don't have homes to go back to.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/3/2011 8:45:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror
people who don't have homes to go back to.
Any proof of that part? That is not only "people" meant, but specifically people who don't have homes to go back to?




Termyn8or -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/3/2011 8:56:18 PM)

quote:

sleeping in donated tents and eating donated food


Who the fuck has something to say about this ? Stockbrokers ? Politicians ? Pretty boys on the fucking news ?

Doesn't really matter if they have homes or not, Maybe it's time someone donated something fucking useful, like LAWS rockets or some incindiaries. Let's get the show on the road.

Yeah, I have no rights now because someone once gave me a pair of gloves. Right.

ETA : Mow they want to come in and monitor protesters ? Gimme a fucking break. Before I would........... never mind.

T^T




DarqueMirror -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/3/2011 8:59:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
Any proof of that part?


You mean other than the fact that they're homeless?




farglebargle -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 7:45:35 AM)

Hooverville is over that way. This is #Occupy....





xssve -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 8:35:20 AM)

Probably the 1% trying to drain the OWS financially, that is how they operate, which you know of course "DarqueMirror", astroturfer that you are.




Owner59 -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 8:39:41 AM)

Yeah.....folks need food and shelter......damm them!




thompsonx -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 8:50:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

And in addition to the bad publicity, the protesters said there are people who have been taking advantage of the movement by sleeping in donated tents and eating donated food.

“I know we’re supposed to be helping the 99 percent, but they need to help us help them by not being a drain on our resources,” said Otto Wagner.


http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/110311-occupy-dallas-to-relocated%2C-regroup

How ironic. They're supposedly protesting income inequality (or whatever the claim is this week) but they can't use *donated* food and tents to help people who don't have homes to go back to.



How is it that you come to this discussion so ill preared. If you do not know the goals of ows by now when do you think you might acquainte yourself with them?
If this food and shelter was donated to ows then isn't it up to ows to decide how to disburse it? So unless you are part of an ows stearing committee then your opinion on how the donations are parceled out is just that an unsubstantiated ignorant opinion




ArizonaBossMan -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 8:53:16 AM)

keep in mind folks, OWS is the BEST of the democrat party! They are protesting themselves. Which makes sense, I will admit. The 99 per centers are stupid, ignorant, ill informed unionists/communists/radicals who take money from wall street, put those people in the highest positions of power, then protest wall street. leftist logic. I know, I know. Crazy isn't it?

January. 20th. 2013. Nobama!




Lucylastic -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 8:56:43 AM)

Ive ordered you a years supply of depends and pepto.... after that you are on your own!!
do not walk into the pit of denial alone my friend.
You have my deepest sympathies




DomYngBlk -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 10:42:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster
Any proof of that part?


You mean other than the fact that they're homeless?


Actual proof might be nice. But, I doubt you have any




thompsonx -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 11:21:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ArizonaBossMan

keep in mind folks, OWS is the BEST of the democrat party!

Is it your position that there are no republicrats in the ows movement?

They are protesting themselves.

It might help if you were to come to the discussion with some knowledge of the discssion. The ows people are not protesting the demopubs but the 1% who control 95% of the pie.

The 99 per centers are stupid, ignorant, ill informed unionists/communists/radicals


The ignorant,ill informed unionist, communists and radicals seem to know quite a bit more than you.



January. 20th. 2013. Nobama!

And what will you do if that black man is made president for another four years?
Why does it offend you so much to have a black man for president?






slvemike4u -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 11:23:59 AM)

That should be more than obvious Thompson.
Perhaps you meant the question to be rhetorical?




SternSkipper -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 4:19:15 PM)

quote:

keep in mind folks, OWS is the BEST of the democrat party! They are protesting themselves. Which makes sense, I will admit. The 99 per centers are stupid, ignorant, ill informed unionists/communists/radicals who take money from wall street, put those people in the highest positions of power, then protest wall street. leftist logic. I know, I know. Crazy isn't it?


Ya know what we're 'keeping in mind'? That this is about as long a post as we're even willing to read from a guy who eats soft food and goes out to the highway and raves shit at passing cars
Later gramps... I am off to my weekend event where I will make MANY of tour brethren VERY VERY UNCOMFORTABLE[:D]




DarqueMirror -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:31:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
How is it that you come to this discussion so ill preared. If you do not know the goals of ows by now when do you think you might acquainte yourself with them?
If this food and shelter was donated to ows then isn't it up to ows to decide how to disburse it? So unless you are part of an ows stearing committee then your opinion on how the donations are parceled out is just that an unsubstantiated ignorant opinion


How about this: when they get one clear-cut message and endgame in ind, I'll know what it is. If they don't know, I can only go by what's in the news. And what's in the news makes the story I quoted terribly ironic.




DarqueMirror -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:32:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Actual proof might be nice. But, I doubt you have any


So we need proof that the homeless are homeless? Have you been living under a rock or what?




DarqueMirror -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:36:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
It might help if you were to come to the discussion with some knowledge of the discssion. The ows people are not protesting the demopubs but the 1% who control 95% of the pie.


And this is what makes the story equated so ironic. We have one group protesting the "1%" that's holds "95% of the pie," but the protesters themselves are controlling the resources at their camps and turning away the homeless who they should be welcoming into their ranks.




Owner59 -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:44:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
How is it that you come to this discussion so ill preared. If you do not know the goals of ows by now when do you think you might acquainte yourself with them?
If this food and shelter was donated to ows then isn't it up to ows to decide how to disburse it? So unless you are part of an ows stearing committee then your opinion on how the donations are parceled out is just that an unsubstantiated ignorant opinion


How about this: when they get one clear-cut message and endgame in ind, I'll know what it is. If they don't know, I can only go by what's in the news. And what's in the news makes the story I quoted terribly ironic.


The beauty part is that they aren`t under control of a party or corporation,PAC,think-tank or political outfit and don`t take orders.

They aren`t for sale,can`t be bought and aren`t leaving.

They don`t need to pretend to be something else, as the Ts did and aren`t going to be told what to do or how to do it.








tazzygirl -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:49:09 PM)

Funny how "some" dont understand that income inequality has nothing to do with whats in their pockets or bank accounts.




Owner59 -> RE: "We're the 99%, but you're not, so go away" (11/4/2011 9:52:08 PM)

There are plenty of examples of OWSers sharing their food with the homeless.

And millions of examples for cons not giving a damm about America`s homeless.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625