DomThoughts
Posts: 50
Joined: 11/29/2006 Status: offline
|
Well I am glad that my rubbish response to that question appears to be the norm! So in an effort to invoke a touch of soul searching, I'll have a go at answering properly. When I first start getting to know a girl, the initial explore I find to be a very self-indulgently gratifying thing. I've been told I do this part considerably different than everybody else (their words not mine!) I take a lot of gratification from knowing the underlying mental, emotional, and psychological reasoning behind the desires that women have. In that initial explore – and the continuing on-going explore I get a lot of satisfaction from knowing that I am understanding motives and connections that nobody has made in that girl before. Once I have gleaned that knowledge, I am quite a mischievous soul (and allegedly menacing!!) it is probably again, largely self-indulgence, I take pride in creating pressure that exploits the nuances I have discovered. I don't really get anything from the generic D/s stuff, unless it is being used as a tool to exploit something deeper. There is a lot of gratification, that probably leaks over to being sexual, from the knowledge that a girl is doing something that I know is difficult, purely because I have asked her to do so. I find this a particularly powerful aspect. There is definitely a sadistic pleasure in this, but I am struggling to see what occurs underneath that pleasure, whether there are more base emotions to sadism. (thoughts on this would be interesting) It is probably a very similar emotion set when it comes to physical play. I enjoy exploring boundaries, and I don't seem to have a preference for how extreme or shallow those boundaries are. If it is pushing a boundary, I can get as much enjoyment from giving a light spanking as I can from an intense pain session. I definitely feed off the reactions rather than the acts. I don't find it a strictly sexual experience, sure the act of having a naked girl tied to one's bed is sexually enjoyable, but the D/s aspects of that aren't primarily sexual for me. This is perhaps massively over simplified, but it is almost as if it is psychologically experimental, sort of 'what happens if we do *this* to the subject' very over simplified indeed! But it also feels vaguely fitting. In fact, on reflection, some of my most memorable D/s experiences have been with women where it hasn't been at all sexual, and has had the opening intention of exploring her underlying reactions and desires with regards to an aspect of D/s, be that pain, humiliation etc. Well that is my thoughts so far, I'm not sure how much of that would stand up to further analysis, I may be way off base on some of it, but reading through it now, it *feels* right. It would be good to read a few others constructing something similar.
< Message edited by DomThoughts -- 11/5/2011 4:49:14 AM >
|