quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

I've been wondering about this I mean is it common to give your slave a new name or to just address them as somthing else like a number or just slave?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

I've been wondering about this I mean is it common to give your slave a new name or to just address them as somthing else like a number or just slave?

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

I've been wondering about this I mean is it common to give your slave a new name or to just address them as somthing else like a number or just slave?

what are you talking about? Who renames anyone or calls them by a number except on Star Trek?

HELLO... Im SEVEN OF NINE... whats your fucking name?

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

GO FOR IT !! And while youre at it, make sure that they address you as Master of the Universe at family functions and reunions. that will be a real knee slapper for the grandkids to remember.

quote:

Within the BDSM community there are those who enjoy the practice of 'naming' or 'tagging' the submissive/slave within the relationship. This issuance of a 'name' is to suggest that the submissive/slave existed in a nameless or non-genuine state prior to becoming the 'property' of their new dominant. The removal or 'stripping' of existing family name is sometimes seen as a way to separate the submissive from their past, from their family, ties, associations and responsibilities, to redirect the individual solely toward service to and responsibility toward the new dominant.

When this name exists 'within' the relationship it can provide meaning to the individuals involved in the relationship, it can represent an expressed devotion between them. However, the stripping of extant names or associations can and may serve to destabilize the mental health of the submissive/slave. The increased dependency may appear to represent the desire of the submissive but in fact may contribute to the actual destruction of the relationship. One of the most recognizable traits of abuse and coercion is actions which 'isolate' the individual (submissive/slave). In addition, diminishment in front of friends, family, coworkers by the imposition of 'slave behavior' or name publicly can be severely injurious to the individual. When considering 'naming' your submissive or slave clearly define the 'arena' in which this name shall be used. Names used in privacy or within scene can be experienced with great pleasure. Names used in public displays (within BDSM community associations, meetings, munches and events) can provide clear statements of attachment and bonding between dominant and submissive. Every human should have a full and robust life which includes family, friends, occupations, hobbies, passions and desires. This medley within a life radiates the health of the life, the health of the person. If you are seeking to 'scene name' your submissive/slave, some of the more favored ways of approaching this is to carefully consider the characteristics, traits and personality of your submissive and match to your submissive a descriptive name which suits or represents those characteristics the best. Always try to ensure that your action is taken to enhance the quality of your relationship. Care should be exercised to ensure that this 'naming' is not a reflection of insecurity on the part of the dominant or based in a need to 'show off' before other dominants.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

GO FOR IT !! And while youre at it, make sure that they address you as Master of the Universe at family functions and reunions. that will be a real knee slapper for the grandkids to remember.

Here's an excerpt of what I'm talking about TROLL.

quote:

Within the BDSM community there are those who enjoy the practice of 'naming' or 'tagging' the submissive/slave within the relationship. This issuance of a 'name' is to suggest that the submissive/slave existed in a nameless or non-genuine state prior to becoming the 'property' of their new dominant. The removal or 'stripping' of existing family name is sometimes seen as a way to separate the submissive from their past, from their family, ties, associations and responsibilities, to redirect the individual solely toward service to and responsibility toward the new dominant.

www.steel-door.com/tagging.htm

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Within the BDSM community there are those who enjoy the practice of 'naming' or 'tagging' the submissive/slave within the relationship. This issuance of a 'name' is to suggest that the submissive/slave existed in a nameless or non-genuine state prior to becoming the 'property' of their new dominant. The removal or 'stripping' of existing family name is sometimes seen as a way to separate the submissive from their past, from their family, ties, associations and responsibilities, to redirect the individual solely toward service to and responsibility toward the new dominant.

That bolded part doesnt bother you?

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

IM sorry ----> ME BAD.. youre just a kid.

Have you ever looked into GOR? That seems to be right up your ally.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

IM sorry ----> ME BAD.. youre just a kid.

Have you ever looked into GOR? That seems to be right up your ally.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Within the BDSM community there are those who enjoy the practice of 'naming' or 'tagging' the submissive/slave within the relationship. This issuance of a 'name' is to suggest that the submissive/slave existed in a nameless or non-genuine state prior to becoming the 'property' of their new dominant. The removal or 'stripping' of existing family name is sometimes seen as a way to separate the submissive from their past, from their family, ties, associations and responsibilities, to redirect the individual solely toward service to and responsibility toward the new dominant.

That bolded part doesnt bother you?

I didn't read all of it I just searched, skimmed, copied and paste I didn't even see that part.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: SAMHAIN09

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Within the BDSM community there are those who enjoy the practice of 'naming' or 'tagging' the submissive/slave within the relationship. This issuance of a 'name' is to suggest that the submissive/slave existed in a nameless or non-genuine state prior to becoming the 'property' of their new dominant. The removal or 'stripping' of existing family name is sometimes seen as a way to separate the submissive from their past, from their family, ties, associations and responsibilities, to redirect the individual solely toward service to and responsibility toward the new dominant.

That bolded part doesnt bother you?

I didn't read all of it I just searched, skimmed, copied and paste I didn't even see that part.

When you are reading sites, you should read a bit more closely. Those bolded words should have told you.... whoa!.. and at least made you pause.