RE: Atheists have a PR problem (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:28:09 PM)

What questions related to my statement have I evaded?




tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:31:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

Yes tazzy, whatever you say. [8|]


So its your contention that there is only one "right" reason?





tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:32:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

If you bring a problem to the table, without a possible solution
I didn't realize I had mentioned a problem that needed a solution.

quote:

If you didnt want it to be open to discussion.......
What on earth gave you that idea?


Noticed your edit.

So, you have no problem with the fact that religious people, according to this limited study, states that they do not trust atheists?




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:42:06 PM)

quote:

So its your contention that there is only one "right" reason?
That isn't related to my statement. Its a red herring meant to sidetrack the discussion and start off one of your trademark inane 10-page walkabouts. I'm not bored enough to do that tonight. Sorry.

quote:

So, you have no problem with the fact that religious people, according to this limited study, states that they do not trust atheists?
No, not really. It has no effect on me or my life, and like I said, its pretty much how I would expect them to respond to the question. Do you have a problem with it?




Termyn8or -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:45:50 PM)

quote:

The researcher opines that believers have a greater sense of ethical behavior because there is a Big God in the sky prepared to punish them and they believe Atheists lack an ethical code due to the absence of a punishing Diety.


Doesn't that pretty much prove the opposite ?

T^T




tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:49:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

So its your contention that there is only one "right" reason?
That isn't related to my statement. Its a red herring meant to sidetrack the discussion and start off one of your trademark inane 10-page walkabouts. I'm not bored enough to do that tonight. Sorry.

quote:

So, you have no problem with the fact that religious people, according to this limited study, states that they do not trust atheists?
No, not really. It has no effect on me or my life, and like I said, its pretty much how I would expect them to respond to the question. Do you have a problem with it?



Since I have already given you the correct answer, Im sure we dont have to go on for 10 pages. There are at least 5 forms of reasoning. You are deciding that yours is the only one thats valid, not to mention you are extremely belittling, in your statement.

They are able to feel the way they do because they are deliberately operating irrationally.

Doubtful you can prove that, nor do I care to ask you to do so. Just wanted to point out that your attitude is, at least, part of the problem.




Termyn8or -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 6:51:16 PM)

quote:

If christians are so pathetically immoral that they need the constant threat of unending torture to simply obey the rules of society why do we let them out in public?


We've tried to get rid of them but they keep coming back like hemmoroids.

T^T




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:02:56 PM)

quote:

Just wanted to point out that your attitude is, at least, part of the problem.
So part of the problem is that theists resent having people say things that are true? Yeah, I can agree with that, they can really get their backs up when confronted with facts that contradict some part of their chosen dogma.The flip side of that is that so many atheists set out to do just that, knowing full well that its a pointless exercise.

Its like trying to persuade Cheri she's wrong to back the Habs. There's no point telling her that the defence sucks, or they can't score goals, she knows that, she watches the same games. But she doesn't care. She's chosen to disregard those facts and to continue to cheer on her team based on an emotional response, rather than an analysis of the facts. Her position is a deliberately irrational one.





tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:10:13 PM)

Its like trying to persuade Cheri she's wrong to back the Habs. There's no point telling her that the defence sucks, or they can't score goals, she knows that, she watches the same games. But she doesn't care. She's chosen to disregard those facts and to continue to cheer on her team based on an emotional response, rather than an analysis of the facts. Her position is a deliberately irrational one.

Taking your analogy. I choose to back the Tarheels (college team). Their basketball team is typically in the top 5... I miss the days of Dean Smith and Jim Valvano. But, I digress. I am a loyal fan... even their football team... which sucks ass most years. For me, its not about winning... its not about who is best. Im the same way with the Braves and the Panthers.

My reason for backing the Tarheels? They were the team my brother always pulled for. His favorite team. I spent many hours watching the games with him. Then he committed suicide. When I watch the team now, I feel closer to him.

Is that rational to you? Possibly not. You seem to believe someone should only follow a team if they are winners.

Its extremely rational to me. Its something I want to do, something I have thought about. I dont need them to win. Winning to me isnt the point.

Different people have many different reasons for doing the same thing.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:15:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Just wanted to point out that your attitude is, at least, part of the problem.
So part of the problem is that theists resent having people say things that are true? Yeah, I can agree with that, they can really get their backs up when confronted with facts that contradict some part of their chosen dogma.The flip side of that is that so many atheists set out to do just that, knowing full well that its a pointless exercise.

Its like trying to persuade Cheri she's wrong to back the Habs. There's no point telling her that the defence sucks, or they can't score goals, she knows that, she watches the same games. But she doesn't care. She's chosen to disregard those facts and to continue to cheer on her team based on an emotional response, rather than an analysis of the facts. Her position is a deliberately irrational one.




They do have Carey Price though ;) Rangers TO Monday, should be a good one.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:18:43 PM)

I'm sorry to hear that happened to your brother, you have my deepest sympathies, that's a terrible tragedy to have to endure.

quote:

Is that rational to you?
No. Quite the opposite in fact, doing something because your brother did it is completely irrational.

quote:

You seem to believe someone should only follow a team if they are winners.
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D] I'm a Leafs fan. They almost invariably suck, yet I root for them because I always have, and my family always has. Its completely irrational. I just used Cheri and the Habs as the example because they are at the bottom of the standings right now, where the Leafs usually are.

quote:

Different people have many different reasons for doing the same thing.
Having a reason to do something does not mean that reason is a rational one..




tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:21:44 PM)

quote:

completely irrational


Some people do believe rational thought should be absent of emotions. Is this your belief?




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:25:58 PM)

It has to be, otherwise its not rational thought.




Termyn8or -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:26:52 PM)

quote:

I want to point out that the survey does NOT say anything about what "Christians" feel, only "religious" people, without reference to what religion. I think the results are based on two factors.

1. An atheist, by his mere existence challenges the religious persons beliefs, and more than challenge them the way a follower of a different religion would, they reject them. Simply saying that one is an atheist is a complete denial and rejection of a religious person's deepest and most cherished beliefs. But as those beliefs cannot be substantiated and must, by definition, be upheld purely on faith, the existence of a person happily rejecting them with no obvious consequences calls into question, to at least some degree, those beliefs in the believers mind. Many religious people also find their beliefs to be self-evident, that god exists, in whatever form, is so deeply ingrained in their psyches that if a person is denying it, they must have some sort of ulterior motive, since what they are denying is so patently obvious to the believer. this makes the atheist seem to be a threat, just look at how some religious types on these boards throw "atheist" out as if it were a pejorative term.

2. Atheism is based on rationality, while religion is based on emotion, so it also follows that atheists would not consider religious beliefs to be a valid measure of a person's trustworthiness, since there is no rational basis for doing so. The religious person, being less conditioned to rely on reason and more conditioned to rely on emotion, is more likely to fall prey to an Us & Them mentality, its an instinctual tribal reaction among humans to do so, to identify with the similar and to distrust the different. It requires reason and conscious thought/effort to override such instinctual urges, which makes such overriding less likely among believers in this specific context, as it deals with an area <religious belief> where the believer has already discarded reason and rationality as a basis for making judgments.

Just my thoughts on it at the moment.


You just keep on gaining my respect, know that ?

Anyway, I think a significant factor is just how religion came about. Psychology does play a huge part in religion because humans are pack animals. We have an innate desire to belong, for good or for bad. Sometmes it takes on a gang mentality, and as much as I may despise that, is at the root of most people's patriotism and other traits normally percieved as "good" and "right".

The process of indoctrinating the human race has been going on for over five thousand years. This has hampered science many times, and caused more destruction than the lack of theism ever could, or even Devil worship. But they don't see it that way, only certain ones have the right to life, and "let God sort them out". These idea[l]s are rampant among the religious as well as the Pharisic. They are actually greedier than most true atheists I think, but then, I don't think they really believe.

I mean I think they are faking it and the church provides for a clubhouse for their gang and they comcoct plans and shit to promote their agenda. And this is all fine and good because God says so. Any means is fine to spread the word because it is SO IMPORTANT, dealing with your eternal soul and all that.

Yes, we want YOU to believe this, and we will tell you we do, but as you await your reward in heaven we will rob you blind on Earth.

Maybe like an animal I saw this a long time ago, like when I was five years old. All through my childhood, if certain peole wanted to "talk" to me I would try to steal a jet fighter if possible. Get me to accept the "Lord Jesus Christ" into my heart. Are you fucking kidding me ? Time and time again, my friends' Parents and all, damn, let me the fuck outta here.

And over the years I hear this story of a kid who, when told about God became very distraught at the "fact" that some entity could read all their thoughts and shit, even intent and all that. It fucking terrified the kid !

Think about it, every nasty little thought you had about "I'd like to smack tis MF" or "I should hit that asshole just because he drives like an asshole" is read and recorded by some super being who, if "He" gets pissed at you can make you burn in a fire forever without ever burning up, so it's forever. Tell a fucking little kid something like that is damnear a fucking CRIME ! Scare the shit outtta them. Something about brimstone too, whateve that is.

But people still cling to it because iof an innate - animal instinct in fact. The clan. The herd. The pack. The gaggle. The flock, oh yes the flock. And the school.

Neither are actually symbols of society's conformity, they are tools used for it's implementation. And while there are certainly some true believers, it's impossible for all of them to be ignorant to that extent. The know it and use it.

T^T

* - not misspelled
** - misspelled




tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:28:17 PM)

Yet many in the field also acknowledge only those with no affective feelings could possibly rise to that lofty level. Myself, I do not possess that absence of emotion.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:35:31 PM)

It isn't about being devoid of feelings, its simply a matter of divorcing your thought process from your feelings. And if you can't keep your emotions from clouding your thought process, then you're incapable of being entirely rational.




Termyn8or -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:43:15 PM)

quote:

Their faith, however, also includes belief in an Enemy of God, a Deceiver, who willfully rejects God's laws and strives against his Kingdom. Confronted with those who willfully reject and even deliberately attack belief in God, they see the hand of that Deceiver at work. If you want convincing, just listen to any evangelical for five minutes.


That's the default view, if you ain't fer us yer agin us. There is no middle ground. The lack of faith is CAUSED by the deciever, the adversary, the Devil or whatever. You cannot serve two Masters, but I'm sure someone on here could disagree....

There is no neutrality. It wasn't alowed for Switzerland, the got that Nazi money out of them. I don't think that's right but who cares what I think. You cannot be neutral. One of my favorite movie lines of all time was Crocodile Dundee saying "Ain't none of my business". That's a good way to be, but for some that is not good enough. Without motherhood, brotherhood, colors of greena and gray, as well as emerald colored glasses, you ust have to go. There is no coexisting. YOU have to go, not THEM. YOU didn't do anything, but YOU have to go.

No wonder ammunition is in suck high demand. You want a steadt job ? Go work in a gunpowder factory. That's how the world works.

T^T




tazzygirl -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:43:20 PM)

No one is completely rational, no matter how much you wish to divorce yourself from your emotions. I do believe some see it as a lofty perch to ascend too. But its unrealistic.




tweakabelle -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:47:39 PM)

Please girls, with respect, this is a never ending argument and one that isn't at the core of the dilemma facing freethinkers in North America.

If it is is agreed that fear (for whatever reason) and ignorance are major factors in the distrust many believers feel towards freethinkers, wouldn't it be more productive to examine how this impression can be turned around? For mine, it's clearly a distorted image of freethinkers that can must be built on a very shaky base, one that ought to be addressed immediately




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Atheists have a PR problem (12/3/2011 7:49:06 PM)

So? How is that relevant?




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.882813E-02