LanceHughes
Posts: 4737
Joined: 2/12/2004 Status: offline
|
At 35, I had a boy of 65. Now, at 61, my range is 35 to 55. Was recently CMailed on other side: "Sir, do you have an age limit on the slaves you are looking for?" How's that for an intro one-liner? Turns out he's 35 and was worried that he was too old. Turns out he's almost not old enough. LOL! Hey, DS.... how's your sig line go? Something about breasts and hair? Maybe you should add age. LOL! A friend once said, "The best time to find a 19 year old boy friend is when you are 19 years old." Probably true for all gender combos, but after 19 or 20 or 21 - bet's are off..... At 61, I'm not about to teach "life-experiences" to a 20-year old. Not that they'd listen anyway. A 20 year old could very well be my grand-child. YIKES! If I had a child at my 20, and they had a boy at their 20 (my 40) that boy would now be 20!!!! The proble is NOT age, it's generational - loved the comment above about "Beatle's lyrics." Vietnam draft? The sexual liberation? Stonewall - more than 35 years ago.... and on and on. Early computers compared to what is called the "connected generation." Sorry, just can't "do" it.
_____________________________
"Train 'em the right way - my way." Lance Hughes "Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer, but wish we didn't." Erica Jong 10 fluffy points 50 nz points Member: VAA's posse
|