tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: InControl75 . quote:
Once again Iran will not be the aggressor but acting to protect and defend its sovereignty. Your point doesn't work. We still are waiting for a single action by Iran that demands a military response. Correct. Their words / saber-rattling are not grounds for us to take action, and we have not. My point does work. If they blockade / close the strait, that is an act of war, which most likely would cause the US to talk to the United Nations to get permission to take action against them. Our positions may be a lot closer that they may have seemed. If Iran closes the Straits after a US and/or Israeli attack, then it will be responding to an illegal act. If there are no illegal acts committed upon Iran, then the current peace should prevail. We might also note that Israel and (to a lesser extent) the US are doing their share of sabre-rattling too. An Iranian attempt to close the Straits completely, in response to further UN sanctions, would be an illegal response to a legal act. If an Iranian response to a foreign act of war exceeds its legal rights, then the correct place to decide upon further responses/actions is the UN Security Council. If we can agree that a initial US/Israeli attack,without UN authorisation, is an illegal act of war, the the prime responsibility for all ensuing actions and reactions will fall on the US and/or Israel. From where I sit, the question of UN approval is all-important. If all parties act with prudence and remain within the boundaries of international law, and in particular refrain from unilateral acts, then hopefully any military action will be avoided. These are always diplomatic solutions available whenever both sides want to find them. In the context of how this question arose initially - Sanity was asked to list all the actions he claimed Iran had done that merited US and/or Israeli military intrevention - the threat to close the Straits fails to qualify as one such action. I'm pleased to note that we appear to agree on this. BTW welcome to the boards!
< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/31/2011 12:15:02 AM >
_____________________________
|