tweakabelle -> RE: This is how Russian Sailors handle pirates. (1/15/2012 12:34:08 PM)
|
quote:
quote:
Even the very worst offenders in your country or mine enjoys the right to a fair trial. Ted Bundy got one, so did Timothy McVeigh, Jeffrey Dahlmer too, and they don't come much worse than any of those three. Even the butchers of the Khmer Rouge are getting a fair trial as I write. To slaughter alleged pirates in cold blood, as is suggested in the video and the OP, is not the answer. Arrest them, put them on trial and let convicted pirates pay the price the courts decide. That is the way civilised people handle these matters. To mow them down like rabid dogs is to reduce ourselves to their level. "Reduce ourselves to their level?" Tweak, ***they're*** the ones who were engaging in piracy, not us. And, Bundy, McVeigh and Dahmer were U.S. citizens. There's no evidence I've seen of the 'victims' engaging in piracy or any other crime, pops. You're imagining or inventing things. The victims are alleged pirates and retain that status until convicted of piracy by a court of law. OTOH some people seem to be advocating lynch law, extra-judicial killing and have even made certain claims/admissions in this respect. So it could be argued that the alleged pirates are being dragged down to the level of those people ie. that of self-confessed common murderers. I'd prefer to leave discussion of the relative statuses of pirates and murderers to people happy to dwell in that particular cesspit. Basic principles such as the rule of law and human rights (every person on this planet has human rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) are UNIVERSAL in their application, no matter the circumstances or alleged circumstances. To suggest that US citizens are entitled to fair trials and human rights but Somalis aren't is pure racism. I suppose one either believes in the universal rule of law and universal human rights or one doesn't. There's no compromises here, no selective applications. Clearly, pops, the self-serving position you propose isn't consistent with belief in these universal principles.
|
|
|
|