TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle I thought the whole rationale behind drug testing welfare recipients was to prevent public money being used to subsidise/finance drug habits. If someone on welfare is given drugs or inhales them because they're in a room where others are smoking drugs, then there is no justification for penalising them, is there? To me the glaring hypocrisy involved in a public representative getting drunk on the public purse, and then drink-driving while proposing laws that penalise welfare recipients for testing positive to drugs is indefensible. And the drink-driver is a far greater threat to public health and safety, wouldn't you agree? No, Tweak. The rational behind drug testing welfare recipients (and I'm using "welfare" specifically to the AFDC programs as they exist here) is not about people getting high on tax dollars. Pre-employment drug testing is pretty much the norm, random workplace screening is common and in a number of professions, drug testing is mandated by law. If the goal of these programs is to not only to issue poverty maintenance checks, but to assist the needy in getting onto their own feet, it is simply counter-productive not to impose drug testing there.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|