Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Biblical question to Biblical followers


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Biblical question to Biblical followers Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 1:05:27 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
I'm curious.
Do you think the bible is the word of God? Or a collection of peoples histories and parables?
Are you aware of how the bible was put together?
Are you aware there are other versions?
Do you consider it infallable?
How do you reconcile what you know of the bible, with a faith in it?
What are your worst conflicts with biblical writings/laws, and how do you deal with them?
I am an aetheist. But I am interested. It has a huge effect on our world.
There is a reflection of nonreligious folks with conflicts with the law/society and biblical followers and it's complex laws/society.
Please keep the flames to a minimum, and civil.

< Message edited by Kedikat -- 6/1/2006 1:07:28 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 1:28:55 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
 I think the overall message behind religious texts *can* be good. If one follows the train of thought of compassion, forgiveness, doing good, altruism. I also think its painfully obvious that the majority were written by men with their own best interests at heart. And sadly far to many people seem to want to pick and choose what they will follow and preach, and often its the more violent and self serving quotes.
To me one big issue I have is those that adopt it as direct quotes from God. The whole "only one, the true one etc". It really can warp an otherwise intelligent and logicial person wherein they no longer think for themselves but just take everything on "faith". Thats a cop out for so many people that they use to settle for second best their whole lives and/or to sell themselves short. Its "Gods will", etc.
Versions. There are so many versions, revisions, deletions, alterations, translations that the average lay person has no clue about. I do think it would be interesting to be allowed access to the acres of scrolls, text, writings etc that is burried in the Vatican vaults and basements purely from a curiosity standpoint. But of course these are heavily secreted deep within the bowels and will probably never see the light of day or the average person be allowed to view them.
With the exception of the whole afterlife thing (used to be the focal point but not so much anymore as its political) it can be summarized into about the same as the Golden Rule. Do unto others. That should be the template or guiding directive that is gleened from the Bible, Koran etc, but,,,, not really these days.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 1:42:52 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

I think the overall message behind religious texts *can* be good. If one follows the train of thought of compassion, forgiveness, doing good, altruism. I also think its painfully obvious that the majority were written by men with their own best interests at heart. And sadly far to many people seem to want to pick and choose what they will follow and preach, and often its the more violent and self serving quotes.
To me one big issue I have is those that adopt it as direct quotes from God. The whole "only one, the true one etc". It really can warp an otherwise intelligent and logicial person wherein they no longer think for themselves but just take everything on "faith". Thats a cop out for so many people that they use to settle for second best their whole lives and/or to sell themselves short. Its "Gods will", etc.
Versions. There are so many versions, revisions, deletions, alterations, translations that the average lay person has no clue about. I do think it would be interesting to be allowed access to the acres of scrolls, text, writings etc that is burried in the Vatican vaults and basements purely from a curiosity standpoint. But of course these are heavily secreted deep within the bowels and will probably never see the light of day or the average person be allowed to view them.
With the exception of the whole afterlife thing (used to be the focal point but not so much anymore as its political) it can be summarized into about the same as the Golden Rule. Do unto others. That should be the template or guiding directive that is gleened from the Bible, Koran etc, but,,,, not really these days.


But do you identify as a christian? I sort of expect that christians who reply to this thread on this particular venue, might be more informed of, or at least, less constricted by biblical word. Or in some quandry of it.

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 1:45:22 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I don't claim to be an expert so I stand to be corrected. Much of the Bible (Old Testament) was wrtten in the 7th century BC and was a political tract taking stories from earlier times. Nebuchadnezzar exiled the prominent Jewish classes to Babylon, his seat and left the lower classes in Judah. When Cyrus, the Persian king conquered Mesopotamia, he allowed the Jews of Babylon to return to Jerusalem. This was when the Torah (the central text of Judaism) appears to have taken shape and apparently can be identified as written by one scribe or scholar, whose name defeats me. It is essentially a justification for the Jewish return to Jerusalem. Archeologists say that many of the places in the Old Testement only came into being in the later part of the 7th century so it is known that much of the Old Testement can't be older so the Bible is probably not as ancient as people think and the Iyliad and Odyessy are probably just as old and maybe older.

There are many anomalies in the Bible. One being the slavery of the Jews in Eygyt. No records have been found of Jewish slaves building pyramids or anything else in Egypt. In fact records exist as to how Eygptian craftsmen were employed to build the pyramids etc. in seasons outside seasonal agricultural work and in years of poor harvest, when the Egyptians bought extra grain from southern Europe to pay for craftsmen.

Such a long time since I read up on it I'll leave it there or risk being wrong in important details.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 6/1/2006 1:47:30 AM >

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:05:16 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

I don't claim to be an expert so I stand to be corrected. Much of the Bible (Old Testament) was wrtten in the 7th century BC and was a political tract taking stories from earlier times. Nebuchadnezzar exiled the prominent Jewish classes to Babylon, his seat and left the lower classes in Judah. When Cyrus, the Persian king conquered Mesopotamia, he allowed the Jews of Babylon to return to Jerusalem. This was when the Torah (the central text of Judaism) appears to have taken shape and apparently can be identified as written by one scribe or scholar, whose name defeats me. It is essentially a justification for the Jewish return to Jerusalem. Archeologists say that many of the places in the Old Testement only came into being in the later part of the 7th century so it is known that much of the Old Testement can't be older so the Bible is probably not as ancient as people think and the Iyliad and Odyessy are probably just as old and maybe older.

There are many anomalies in the Bible. One being the slavery of the Jews in Eygyt. No records have been found of Jewish slaves building pyramids or anything else in Egypt. In fact records exist as to how Eygptian craftsmen were employed to build the pyramids etc. in seasons outside seasonal agricultural work and in years of poor harvest, when the Egyptians bought extra grain from southern Europe to pay for craftsmen.

Such a long time since I read up on it I'll leave it there or risk being wrong in important details.


I might disagree as to how overall the old testament is about what you state. It definitely contains a lot of that. But you may just be making a specific point about a good portion of it. I take into account that people don't want to write a novel in reply. I like all the recent info on the aspects of how the pyramids were built. It makes them much more a great monument to peoples in general. A very nice history of the biblical writings, as to their origins and time frames and historical events at the time is Asimovs guide to the bible. Two books one for each testament. It does not go into any philisophical or religious aspects. It is quite dated now, but good. New info comes up all the time.

Are you a christian?

< Message edited by Kedikat -- 6/1/2006 2:11:14 AM >

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:12:37 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I was brought up in a moderate left leaning Christian family, religion wasn't a big deal but when I told my mother when I was around seventeen (when one starts to find ones own info I guess) that Christianity didn't add up she was shocked which surprised me.

I'm not a Christian now but whether one can totally shake off ones upbringing is another thing. I like to think I can but I'm probably being arrogant to think I can.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:12:39 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat
But do you identify as a christian? I sort of expect that christians who reply to this thread on this particular venue, might be more informed of, or at least, less constricted by biblical word. Or in some quandry of it.
 

Not in the conventional sense, no. I was raised Methodist so have been exposed to it far more than I would like to recall. As in hammered by it through church, youth fellowship, bible studies, bible school, church camp, parents, relatives, etc.
Quandry may well be the operative word. Its all taken on faith, no fact. Its not presented otherwise although the followers endlessly search for anything that could be regarded as fact. It conflicts with the very core of human reproduction and desires. Thats a quandry for just about everyone, lol.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:23:52 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat
But do you identify as a christian? I sort of expect that christians who reply to this thread on this particular venue, might be more informed of, or at least, less constricted by biblical word. Or in some quandry of it.
 

Not in the conventional sense, no. I was raised Methodist so have been exposed to it far more than I would like to recall. As in hammered by it through church, youth fellowship, bible studies, bible school, church camp, parents, relatives, etc.
Quandry may well be the operative word. Its all taken on faith, no fact. Its not presented otherwise although the followers endlessly search for anything that could be regarded as fact. It conflicts with the very core of human reproduction and desires. Thats a quandry for just about everyone, lol.


I consider the bible to be a mix of fuzzy history ( fuzzy as to motives of the teller and poor records of the time ). Parables of how to live decently ( tainted often with bias of politics and religion, and lack of science at the time )
And too often, the rules to keep the masses in line. A continuing theme before and till now.
It should have been continually edited. As it was at the times. Many writers from many times being collected. But sadly, cut off, and carved in stone as it were at some point. As the world continued onwards.

Damn. I am blabbing opinions of an aetheist, when I was seeking opinions of biblical followers. It is so hard to resist!

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:32:05 AM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat
It should have been continually edited. As it was at the times. Many writers from many times being collected. But sadly, cut off, and carved in stone as it were at some point. As the world continued onwards.
 

Thats one other major point of contention as with the US Constitution. Living document or set in stone. Everything else in the universe evolves, with that (biblical and according to them constitution as well) being the exception.

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:44:50 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
There are ammendments to the constitution. But not much lately. ( maybe a good thing in the present atmosphere )
Oddly, the catholic church continues to modify their religion, but not the bible. The pope being accepted as the holy stenographer. Maybe a few more religions could use a current blue pencil directed by their god.
Frighteningly, it seems the constitution may be the document edited by the current supposed word of god.


(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 2:56:02 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

I was brought up in a moderate left leaning Christian family, religion wasn't a big deal but when I told my mother when I was around seventeen (when one starts to find ones own info I guess) that Christianity didn't add up she was shocked which surprised me.

I'm not a Christian now but whether one can totally shake off ones upbringing is another thing. I like to think I can but I'm probably being arrogant to think I can.


I bet you can. Even the comment about moderately left leaning shows your home was open to thoughts. That is powerful. There is much beauty and truth in the bible and all the religious texts I have delved into. Taking it literally and using it in a formalized religion so often obscures and perverts it.
Maybe it was the thought of you rejecting the basic truths and humanity of biblical/christian ideals that shocked your mom. A lot of it doesn't add up. But some of it, as in all religions, is so pure and good.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 3:17:11 AM   
indybbwsubbie


Posts: 51
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
i stand proudly to say that i am a christian......as well as a submissive woman.  i find that there is not a contradiction in the two - but a wonderful melding and belonging of them as they function together.  i know who i am and that i desire to submit to ONE as the Word of God says.  i also show understanding and tolerance to those who do not follow or believe exactly as i do......and rejoice in the diversity that we all can possess in this lifestyle. 

i fought hard to throw off my "pseudo christian" religion and its beliefs - to grab hold onto the God and Jesus of the Bible.  And i am one wanting to open up others in the lifestyle that not all christians are "holier than thou" and want to expose and tear down ppl in the life - but to work and learn from each other - side by side.  Many christians do great disserrvice to those of us who simply want to live this life - and i am not one of them. 

Blessings to all....
subbie

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 3:23:36 AM   
pistachio


Posts: 16
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
There are many anomalies in the Bible. One being the slavery of the Jews in Eygyt. No records have been found of Jewish slaves building pyramids or anything else in Egypt. In fact records exist as to how Eygptian craftsmen were employed to build the pyramids etc. in seasons outside seasonal agricultural work and in years of poor harvest, when the Egyptians bought extra grain from southern Europe to pay for craftsmen.

quote:



Actually...i could be wrong but i believe the bible just says the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt. i dont think it says anything about them building pyramids...you might be thinking about the old Charlton Heston movie, The Ten Commandments.

(in reply to indybbwsubbie)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 3:32:19 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: indybbwsubbie

i stand proudly to say that i am a christian......as well as a submissive woman.  i find that there is not a contradiction in the two - but a wonderful melding and belonging of them as they function together.  i know who i am and that i desire to submit to ONE as the Word of God says.  i also show understanding and tolerance to those who do not follow or believe exactly as i do......and rejoice in the diversity that we all can possess in this lifestyle. 

i fought hard to throw off my "pseudo christian" religion and its beliefs - to grab hold onto the God and Jesus of the Bible.  And i am one wanting to open up others in the lifestyle that not all christians are "holier than thou" and want to expose and tear down ppl in the life - but to work and learn from each other - side by side.  Many christians do great disserrvice to those of us who simply want to live this life - and i am not one of them. 

Blessings to all....
subbie


Good for you.
I did particularly note the comment " to grab hold onto the God and Jesus of the Bible". Particularly, the old testament God is pretty much a harsh hardline God. Jesus being so much more gentle and accepting/forgiving. It is a very conflicting situation. Even in the new testament. How do you reconscile the conflicts?
As far as bible and D/s, M/s, there are lots of ready made chauvinist fits. But do you venture into the very biblical out of bounds in your D/s life? Do you find loopholes in the bible? Or do you take the words of Jesus as being open enough to encompass those things?

(in reply to indybbwsubbie)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 3:52:09 AM   
nightphoenix


Posts: 139
Joined: 1/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat

I did particularly note the comment " to grab hold onto the God and Jesus of the Bible". Particularly, the old testament God is pretty much a harsh hardline God. Jesus being so much more gentle and accepting/forgiving. It is a very conflicting situation. Even in the new testament. How do you reconscile the conflicts?


Actually there really is no conflict there if you have a real understanding of how the Old and New Covenants came about.  To give a whirlwind overview, in the Old Testament, there was no option of being "Saved"...God told Adam that if he ate the fruit, he'd die that day - and he did...and every one born since was spiritually dead, until Jesus was able to be brought into the world to fix that.  (To go into much more detail would takes hours more than I have the time for at the moment).

Really though, I grew up in a Christian background, but I didn't settle for just following along with what I was taught as a child, especially being such a rational thinker that a lot of conflicts in the Bible kind of jumped out at me....so I was very much the type to dig into it and figure this out myself, and what's funny is the more I dug, the more I saw that the Bible conflicts with itself very little if you actually understand what it's saying.

(One quick example, when King James translated the Old Testament, they didn't realize that there was a "Permissive tense" in Hebrew, so they translated a lot of lines to say "I will smite you" that were intended to say "I will have to allow you to be smited" etc). 

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 4:07:29 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nightphoenix

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kedikat

I did particularly note the comment " to grab hold onto the God and Jesus of the Bible". Particularly, the old testament God is pretty much a harsh hardline God. Jesus being so much more gentle and accepting/forgiving. It is a very conflicting situation. Even in the new testament. How do you reconscile the conflicts?


Actually there really is no conflict there if you have a real understanding of how the Old and New Covenants came about.  To give a whirlwind overview, in the Old Testament, there was no option of being "Saved"...God told Adam that if he ate the fruit, he'd die that day - and he did...and every one born since was spiritually dead, until Jesus was able to be brought into the world to fix that.  (To go into much more detail would takes hours more than I have the time for at the moment).

Really though, I grew up in a Christian background, but I didn't settle for just following along with what I was taught as a child, especially being such a rational thinker that a lot of conflicts in the Bible kind of jumped out at me....so I was very much the type to dig into it and figure this out myself, and what's funny is the more I dug, the more I saw that the Bible conflicts with itself very little if you actually understand what it's saying.

(One quick example, when King James translated the Old Testament, they didn't realize that there was a "Permissive tense" in Hebrew, so they translated a lot of lines to say "I will smite you" that were intended to say "I will have to allow you to be smited" etc). 


Hmmmm. There is conflict and fuzziness in your words. Dead/spiritually dead. Jesus fixed things? So that other god was flawed, but corrected by Jesus? So old testament god was false/incorrect? And Jesus is the only god? Able to be brought into the world? Enabled by what/who?
King James did not " Translate " the bible. It had been translated many times before. He told a bunch of guys to gather and edit various versions of biblical texts, to suit his ideas/needs. No doubt some additional translation occured. But they knew who was in charge of the chopping block and his desires. God would forgive them.

Oh. And allow to be smited by who?


< Message edited by Kedikat -- 6/1/2006 4:10:16 AM >

(in reply to nightphoenix)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 4:18:39 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pistachio

Actually...i could be wrong but i believe the bible just says the Hebrews were slaves in Egypt. i dont think it says anything about them building pyramids...you might be thinking about the old Charlton Heston movie, The Ten Commandments.


The Bible does say the Jews were enslaved in Eygpt but as far as I am aware there is no evidence of such large scale slavery as in the mythical writings of the bible. Ramases II did conquer Canaan. I think but could be wrong, Jerusalem was called Magiddo at the time. The Jews were not picked out by the Pharoahs because they were Jewish but like other tribes because they lived on conquered land. The Hitite Empire which was situated in Turkey being a rival. This happened about 6-700 years before the bible was written. The bible was political and mythic writing of a people who considered themselves chosen by god (their god) in a time when just about everyone thought they were chosen by god (their own god of course or as in Ramases case, he was a god). Much of what is claimed in the bible cannot be substantiated by independent archeology and what archeology there is puts doubt on what facts there are in the bible. You pay your money and make your choice.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 6/1/2006 4:23:16 AM >

(in reply to pistachio)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 4:21:50 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
I know my original post asked a lot of questions.
I did not so much want a debate about the bible ( though I love it )
I was hoping to get an idea of what knowledge of the origins of the bible, believers in the bible know of. The sort of technical, historical aspects they might know. And how they reconscile that technical knowledge to a belief.
I base my beliefs on verifiable facts, and a more tenuous belief in the goodness of my friends and hopefully the general populace. Science and day to day facts of life.
I don't like the term belief in this aspect, but it is convenient. I decided very early in life, that to believe something, required some effort to learn how the facts were derived. So I know a fair bit of science and scientific methods. ( Comes in handy for a lot of life ).
This way of me, makes me wonder how far people with different belief systems have actually investigated their beliefs and the methods that built their beliefs.
This applies to many things besides religion. Political leanings often are based on very little knowledge and critical thought. And so many things you might belive in, are not born out in your day to day life.
Deep breath.....
So...Back to my thread origin. Not so much, is the bible right/real/etc..... But how much do you know about what you belive of the bible. And how do any conflicts affect you?

Oh crap, I forgot again. Please note if you are a believer.
( am I spelling reconscile right? ) It looks wrong.


< Message edited by Kedikat -- 6/1/2006 4:23:36 AM >

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 4:36:05 AM   
indybbwsubbie


Posts: 51
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
You said that You didn't want so much as a debate on it.  my feeling is that one should accept those comments for the validity on their own - and rejoice in all of our uniqueness.  While i don't necessarily believe as the pagans and wiccans agnostics and others so - i can stand for what i believe in without tearing down or questioning the intergrity of others' beliefs.  IMHO - that makes me the type of Christian that Jesus wants me to be - kind, and accepting - tolerant of others.  And from that standpoint - we can all learn from each other.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Biblical question to Biblical followers - 6/1/2006 4:42:36 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: indybbwsubbie

You said that You didn't want so much as a debate on it.  my feeling is that one should accept those comments for the validity on their own - and rejoice in all of our uniqueness.  While i don't necessarily believe as the pagans and wiccans agnostics and others so - i can stand for what i believe in without tearing down or questioning the intergrity of others' beliefs.  IMHO - that makes me the type of Christian that Jesus wants me to be - kind, and accepting - tolerant of others.  And from that standpoint - we can all learn from each other.


This is my problem with the new testament. What Jesus said is all too often what other people said he said. This is true of many others such as Socrates but Socrates through Plato gave us a way of thinking, not a way of behaving. Though one could argue through thought, a way of behaving I guess. 

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 6/1/2006 4:44:01 AM >

(in reply to indybbwsubbie)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Biblical question to Biblical followers Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094