quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

which is why I wont argue semantic stuff about his"intent", its a coulda, woulda shoulda argument, Pffffft at that.
Derailing the topic is not gonna be furthered.
It belittles the issue of womens rights an people like Santorum

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Blast away????, you dont get out much do you, is that like me "hating" ...boyoh boy... , do you over compensate much?
you are responsible for YOUR comments, no one else.....its simple, if you make a mistake apologise, I do..theres nothing wimpy about apologising.Truly.
You can make a lot of assumptions about me and others... but Ive yet to see a correct one in your postings so far.
[8|]

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I do apologize when I am wrong.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

In the absence of a moral theory that explains everything without contradiction, any attempt to be moral entails hypocrisy. In the absence of such a theory, the rejection of hypocrisy with solidarity is to reject morality in its entirety.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Blast away????, you dont get out much do you, is that like me "hating" ...boyoh boy... , do you over compensate much?
you are responsible for YOUR comments, no one else.....its simple, if you make a mistake apologise, I do..theres nothing wimpy about apologising.Truly.
You can make a lot of assumptions about me and others... but Ive yet to see a correct one in your postings so far.
[8|]

I do apologize when I am wrong. If the only person responsible for what Santorum says, is Santorum, are you going to give him his opportunity to respond? Of course not. That would only hinder your ability to gripe about him. Barring his showing up on this board, you are essentially stating that no one is allowed to defend his intent while you are allowed to denigrate it (without truly knowing what his intent was).

quote:


No, what I'm saying is: Einstein was an embarrassment; how many times must you be embarrassed before you learn your lesson?

quote:

In the absence of a moral theory that explains everything without contradiction, any attempt to be moral entails hypocrisy. In the absence of such a theory, the rejection of hypocrisy with solidarity is to reject morality in its entirety.

quote:

Feeling more generous now. Hellraiser is a series of films. The regularity of the pins is obviously due to aesthetic considerations. A random pattern would suggest lack of design or intention. You flog a subbie, for example, to help get him or her off. It is a controlled, goal oriented activity. The activity is often if not usually governed by aesthetic considerations. You will often see, for example, subbies exhibiting photos of their wounds that depict a regular pattern.

quote:

You're going to get on me to stay on topic? This thread would be halfway down it's first page if all the off-topic posts were deleted.

The post quoted above, however, IS on topic, as you, too, could be cited for failing to stay on topic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

BTW ... be sure to let us know when you fill that convertible with chicks. I mean the non-inflatable ones of course.

Lemme know if you need a lnk to a Barry White torrent or two[:D]

quote:

Needless to say I am a philosopher.

quote:

Do you have any idea how many women Einstein got? It is something to contemplate.
M = Fc^2
M equals F c squared.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

You're going to get on me to stay on topic? This thread would be halfway down it's first page if all the off-topic posts were deleted.

The post quoted above, however, IS on topic, as you, too, could be cited for failing to stay on topic.

Call a cop then... my posts are largely back and forth with the OP you're out accosting women about Rick Santorum... So forgive me for being nonplussed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Blast away????, you dont get out much do you, is that like me "hating" ...boyoh boy... , do you over compensate much?
you are responsible for YOUR comments, no one else.....its simple, if you make a mistake apologise, I do..theres nothing wimpy about apologising.Truly.
You can make a lot of assumptions about me and others... but Ive yet to see a correct one in your postings so far.
[8|]

I do apologize when I am wrong. If the only person responsible for what Santorum says, is Santorum, are you going to give him his opportunity to respond? Of course not. That would only hinder your ability to gripe about him. Barring his showing up on this board, you are essentially stating that no one is allowed to defend his intent while you are allowed to denigrate it (without truly knowing what his intent was).

my ability to gripe about him does not depend on him coming on to this board, Oh the beauty of free speech....but when its on a message board, you dont get to determine what I would say were I able to. What a Strange concept, having to give someone the benefit of doubt on what someone else swears he meant.
Im disagreeing with YOUR attempt to denigrate me. That I can respond to and disregard. I didnt state anything of the kind.. truly you are dreaming and dramatic.

Get over it...or not...

quote:

Btw, that's hypocrisy in it's purest form. I have yet to accost anyone on here. I presented an alternative to her narrative, and it has gone on and on. I would enjoy knowing, however, how Hellraiser has anything to do with the OP's original post. Since Hellraiser is one of my favorite movies, I am quite interested in reading your response.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

I see, now. You want free speech, but you don't want someone who give an possible alternative to have free speech. Got it. Hypocrisy in action. Plus, at no time have I sworn that Santorum meant "man" as in Mankind." I merely pointed out that he could have meant it in that manner and whatever source you quoted may have made the mistake in not capitalizing the 'M' to point to that meaning. Are you going to tell me that there is no way that Santorum meant man as in human beings, but man as males of the species? Is that what you really think?

How my offering an alternative explanation denigrates you, I have no idea. Perhaps I am supposed to simply accept your analysis and skip down bubblegum lane lined with lollipops and cotton candy. I think you are getting to know me well enough to know that I don't do that.

Even if I was to denigrate you, how is it that I don't have free speech rights to do so?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Needless to say I am a philosopher.

That's one theory anyway

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

... when he comes to Cambridge he hangs with my homie Jonathan, who says the guy scores "like a fisherman with dynamite".

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

I see, now. You want free speech, but you don't want someone who give an possible alternative to have free speech. Got it. Hypocrisy in action. Plus, at no time have I sworn that Santorum meant "man" as in Mankind." I merely pointed out that he could have meant it in that manner and whatever source you quoted may have made the mistake in not capitalizing the 'M' to point to that meaning. Are you going to tell me that there is no way that Santorum meant man as in human beings, but man as males of the species? Is that what you really think?

How my offering an alternative explanation denigrates you, I have no idea. Perhaps I am supposed to simply accept your analysis and skip down bubblegum lane lined with lollipops and cotton candy. I think you are getting to know me well enough to know that I don't do that.

Even if I was to denigrate you, how is it that I don't have free speech rights to do so?

YOU are the one conflating the issue, blasting me for misogyny, hate, and a few other things, you have made this into a huge thing... you are the issue, and with more than a few so far, and for much the same reason.
I have not said "sworn" or any number of words. Yet you continue to assume a great deal, based on YOUR words, that I havent even alluded to. If I want something said on my behalf, I WILL do it.. I will not continue this with you.
As I said, get over it..or not.

quote:


What a Strange concept, having to give someone the benefit of doubt on what someone else swears he meant.