DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kaliko quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: kalikshama quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Lucylastic, if the sperminator was doing the part of a father, there most likely wouldn't be any financial issues to discuss. If you want someone to help you actually parent, you're going to need to spread it for only those types of guys. Women who spread for the hottest guy, the He-men or the guy with the biggest dick aren't necessarily doing so with how well this guy can be a father. That's not to say that guys are always looking for the gal that is going to be the best potential mother, either. However, if both genders only slept with members of the other gender that would actually make good, responsible fathers there would be far fewer issues Still waiting for an answer: A. Is it women that have multiple sex partners that you find deplorable? B. Or women with multiple sex partners that used contraception that failed? C. Or women with multiple sex partners that do not use contraception? Kali, are you sure you want answers to those questions? You're just a woman hun. In DS's scheme of things, we don't have sex, we don't sleep with partners, we just "spread it". You know, just lie there and figure out how much we're going to take the guy for in child support while he pumps away ..... If His Lordship's rather confused last sentence makes any sense at any level, it seems to be that women are responsible for their male partner's inability to "make good, responsible fathers". Well of course! How silly of me to think that it might be the man's fault - I must have been having a blonde moment! Or, perhaps, if you change the last quoted "fathers" to "parents" (as was intended, as I have yet to have knowledge of any pregnancy resulting from one guy blowing sperm up another guy's ass), it makes perfect sense. If an apology a typo is necessary, let me know and it will be made. [sarcasm]I just want to make sure this is clear: it would be more accurate to refer to me as "His Lardship" and to also drop the capitalization, rather than "His Lordship." I do appreciate that you feel I deserve to be titled, but it is truly not necessary.[/sarcasm] quote:
quote:
Though I don't know that I would term it quite like he did, I do see the point he's making. My own responsibility means that I don't have sex with someone that I don't know well enough to know that he doesn't have 5 other children with 5 other women and isn't taking care of them. It means that I don't have sex with someone unless I trust him to be there in every way if something were to happen unexpectedly. Of course, we can think we know someone and it turns out we're wrong. But I'm still doing what I can to make the wisest, and least risky, choices I can without excluding all men from ever touching me again. Although,...it has been a rather long time since I've had sex. :) And good Lord, before someone jumps all over it, I am not saying that if someone has sex sooner rather than later, that she deserves no support or that he has no responsibility, or whatever. I'm just saying that I see his point. Just as a man may (ideally) want to be sure that a woman he is sleeping with shares his same views about what to do in the event of an unplanned pregnancy, so should a woman. For me, that would mean knowing that man well enough to not even have to ask the question "Are you a decent enough man to be there for me if this happens?" Thank you, Kaliko. At no point in time have I ever condoned the thought that men don't share the responsibility for the baby-making. I absolutely believe both biological parents share the responsibility. Using my money for your (used in the plural meaning both the mother's and the father's) fuck up (literal and figurative) is something I'm against.
|