tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl So, because men dont 1) want to keep their cocks in their pants 2) want to take responsibility on their own and get snipped, 3) want to take responsibility for the outcome, 4) want to allow women the right to abortion... A woman much face all those complications just so society can feel justified in giving her a check???? 1) Correct. We don't want to. Doesn't mean we wont't. We also need to have a place to put them once they are out. So, the men are just as culpable. 2) Some do, interestingly enough. Personally, I think that is a much easier solution than a woman having the surgery (unless it is part of another surgery, like a C-section birth, or an indicated hysterectomy). 3) What responsibility do you want assigned to the baby daddy? $$? Go for it. I would support it wholeheartedly. 4) What women don't have a right to an abortion? What we don't want is the right for women to have an abortion on our dime. I support the baby daddy having a financial obligation in paying for the abortion, but, if you want him to pay at least part, he gets a say in the matter. You want my tax money to pay for your abortion? I get a say in the matter. Face it, tazzygirl, without a male and a female, there is no pregnancy. Regardless of whether or not a guy keeps his cock in his pants, if there isn't a pussy to put it in, there is no pregnancy. It takes 2. Both should have responsibility. Both should bear the financial burden. Both should get a say in the matter. If the courts have to get involved to force shared responsibility, so be it. If you notice, my post was not in reference to anything you said. I assure you, when I have an issue with one of your posts, you will be the first to know.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|