RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


farglebargle -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 12:51:29 PM)

Bill Gates is free to prove he isn't the father. He has plenty of money, so he doesn't even need to use public assistance to do it.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 3:15:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

I'm not on child support. I'm on A bill that would declare that personhood starts at conception.



Yes and at the end of the facts you presented, you went on elocution safari and ended with: "There is zero accountability for the sperm that made it all happen"

First off, just so we're clear; I'm sure you meant the producer of the sperm since sperm's only accountability is did it do its best to impregnate an egg.

What I am refuting is your contention that there isn't plenty of (legal) accountability for a man that fathers a child. I doubt you could find me a state where I could get a woman pregnant and walk away, saying: "It serves her right for being a slut (as has been suggested, here)" and not have a judgement for child support leveled against me. It won't happen.

That makes your statement irresponsible, at best; extremely prejudicial on the whole, and an out-right lie, at the worst. To say that men face no accountability for their actions is ridiculous.

Once women recognize that men do, indeed, bear responsibility, things will be a lot less contentious. Sure, there are dead-beat dads. But the law is on the side of trying to curtail that, as much as possible. They're failing miserably and that's a whole nother story.

I would have absolutely supported Rep. Williams' amendment. It is the "accountability" of a man that would rather not have his child aborted.

Peace and comfort,

Michael



The bill and I are talking about responsibility for the unborn. Child support is for children, who have been born.


Yes and once paternity is established, the mother and father would share in the cost of whatever action is deemed appropriate. Be careful, though, I'm basing my support for this measure based on the fact that the father would need to have a say in which course of action is undertaken.

"A say"; not absolute authority. As it stands now, women say: "It's my body. It's my choice but either the dummy that knocked me up or all you other people need to pay for those things. I don't want any responsibility; just the 'choice'."

Well, folks, as I've said before: with freedom comes responsibility.

You want the freedom to choose with whom you lie down in bed? Your responsibility is to do everything in your power to prevent pregnancy. Unless you're trying to conceive. Then, your responsibility is to let the guy in on that information, also.

If you want the freedom to carry an un-planned pregnancy to term, realize that it is your choice and that parents (both male and female) are responsible for the upbringing of that baby. See, and here's where another issue comes in. It's not as big a thing as it used to be but there are some women who still "trap" men with un-wanted pregnancies. I know of a couple of guys that did everything they could possibly do to prevent a pregnancy and one still occurred. The women, in both cases, decided they had found their golden ticket and this "bastard" was "either going to marry me or pay out the ass". That's because women have no responsibility (accountability, if you will) in these cases.

If you want the freedom to abort a child over the expressed wishes of the father to support and care for that child, your responsibility is to pay for the abortion yourself and not expect him to help.

You want it both ways and I agree that that's a nice way to live life but, I think the females in this country are starting to realize that the gravy train is coming up to the last station on the line.

It's interesting that all the XX-Americans are claiming that the XY-Americans are loathesome bastards that are lazy about birth control/etc. but I'll bet if we started a poll asking if there were a male oral contraceptive that were as effective as the female version, with the exception of XY-Americans that are in stable (in their mind) LTRs, the response would 95% affirmative. and here is the poll.

XX-Americans have the upper hand and they don't want to lose it but, they're gonna. You can't keep basing your arguments on "choice" and then refuse responsibility.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




Lucylastic -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 5:08:38 PM)

[image]http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyjgm9Bmpg1qctkcl.jpg[/image]




kalikshama -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 5:19:25 PM)

I don't know one single mother who views child support as a "golden ticket." Less than half of obligees receive all child support owed. The only golden tickets are on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 5:46:05 PM)

You don't. I do.




Edwynn -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 5:51:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

...  I think the females in this country are starting to realize that the gravy train is coming up to the last station on the line.




Oh yeah. Dammit.They thought they could just live the carefree life of carrying 20 pounds on their stomach, changing a bazillion diapers, being woken up in the middle of the night, cleaning up after the latest spill, cleaning up wounds after falling from the tree or the bike, ...

What a freakin' gravy train.

Let's put an end to that.


Get to the point, dude, let's just as a civilization put the gun to our head and be done with it.

Oh wait, we're already doing that. I just hate that it's such a slow process.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 5:56:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I can imagine that a lot of the crazies would fall in line behind a movement which says, since they're irresponsible, we need to save them from themselves and prevent them from aborting another baby by taking away their ability to get pregnant.

As long as the crazies think of woman as their own private breeding stock, as evidenced by all their claims, how long do you think before this comes around?


I say sterilize every woman (except for women that look like Pamela Anderson...those, put in a colony and I'll visit every damned one of them twice weekly).




Lucylastic -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 6:04:52 PM)

I do love the assumption that men should only have a financial responsibility... no mention of actually being and doing the part OF a father. Anyone can throw money at a childs parent. 18 years of bringing up a child is a million times more difficult than whinning about getting caught financially
Your responsibility as a stud muffin is to do everything in your power to prevent pregnancy. Your responsibility is to let the woman in on that information, also.




kalikshama -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 6:14:44 PM)

The Census bureau also shows that 90% of fathers with joint custody pay all of their child support owed, 70.1% of fathers with access to their children pay all of their child support owed, and only 44.2% of fathers with no access to their children pay child support owed. There is thus a correlation between an active, involved parent, and paying child support.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 7:00:15 PM)

"with access" makes it sound like they're legally barred from having contact? Are the mothers making it difficult (moving away, playing games that so many custodial parents engage in)? Am I interpetting that incorrectly?

In other words; it doesn't say: "Fathers who spend time with their children ..." The "no access" almost makes it sound like it's not the fathers' choice.



Peace and comfort,



Michael




tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 7:46:38 PM)

Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh

Look him up.

When you play, you pay.  Sorry you fellas dont like the rules.  For far too long in this country men got away with not supporting any of their obligations.  Those days ended.

If you fuck.... you are responsible.

Cant get a baby without your sperm, buddy.  Dont want to pay child support then take the responsibility to do something about it.  WTF are you waiting on someone else to take care of YOUR responsibilities.

I really want an answer to that.




tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 7:48:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

"with access" makes it sound like they're legally barred from having contact? Are the mothers making it difficult (moving away, playing games that so many custodial parents engage in)? Am I interpetting that incorrectly?

In other words; it doesn't say: "Fathers who spend time with their children ..." The "no access" almost makes it sound like it's not the fathers' choice.



Peace and comfort,



Michael



Ever thought no access could also mean men who are in jail?  In other countries?  Who are abusive and lost that access?

Oh no, lets just lay all the blame on women who move, shall we?




JanahX -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 7:54:23 PM)

quote:

What I am refuting is your contention that there isn't plenty of (legal) accountability for a man that fathers a child. I doubt you could find me a state where I could get a woman pregnant and walk away, saying: "It serves her right for being a slut (as has been suggested, here)" and not have a judgement for child support leveled against me. It won't happen.


It happens all the TIME. There are tons of judgments on all sorts of court cases in all sorts of different matters. That doesn't mean that these people pay one red cent on them.

In fact I would say 6 out of 10 of my women friends have raised their kids and have filed for child support, and to this day, have yet to see one penny of it. Dont try to tell me the child support system works. For many many many women it is a non-existent agency that does NADA for them.




tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 8:44:05 PM)

But but but he is a man, of course he would know better than we mere women folk.  [8|]




DaddySatyr -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/22/2012 11:06:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JanahX

It happens all the TIME. There are tons of judgments on all sorts of court cases in all sorts of different matters. That doesn't mean that these people pay one red cent on them.



Thank you for helping to make my point. I didn't say these idiots were responsible and met their obligations. I did say that there was accountability for men. Their accountability is mandated by law. It's there. It can't be refuted. 'Twas ever thus!



Peace and comfort,



Michael




tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 1:52:30 AM)

lol.. noticed how you avoided the hard questions. [;)]




DesideriScuri -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 3:26:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I do love the assumption that men should only have a financial responsibility... no mention of actually being and doing the part OF a father. Anyone can throw money at a childs parent. 18 years of bringing up a child is a million times more difficult than whinning about getting caught financially
Your responsibility as a stud muffin is to do everything in your power to prevent pregnancy. Your responsibility is to let the woman in on that information, also.


Lucylastic, if the sperminator was doing the part of a father, there most likely wouldn't be any financial issues to discuss. If you want someone to help you actually parent, you're going to need to spread it for only those types of guys. Women who spread for the hottest guy, the He-men or the guy with the biggest dick aren't necessarily doing so with how well this guy can be a father. That's not to say that guys are always looking for the gal that is going to be the best potential mother, either. However, if both genders only slept with members of the other gender that would actually make good, responsible fathers there would be far fewer issues.




farglebargle -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 4:32:07 AM)

If women aren't given FULL responsibility for EVERY aspect of their healthcare and reproduction, why should they have ANY responsibility?

The moment it was suggest that women *shouldn't* do something, and that The State or any other person but her and her doctor had any say, was the moment people assumed full responsibility for their expenses...

If a woman isn't considered competent to make her own choices about reproduction, how do you expect her to choose to 'keep her legs closed'?




kalikshama -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 4:56:10 AM)

quote:

I did say that there was accountability for men. Their accountability is mandated by law. It's there. It can't be refuted. 'Twas ever thus!


NOT TO THE UNBORN, which was the topic under discussion. Looks like you read this:

quote:

There is zero accountability for the sperm that made it all happen.


and not everything above it:

quote:

OKLAHOMA CITY - A bill that would declare that personhood starts at conception is headed to the Senate floor.

Senate Bill 1433, by Sen. Brian Crain, R-Tulsa, passed the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services on Monday, the first day of the legislative session.

The measure says life begins at conception.

"Unborn children have protectable interest in life, health and well-being," the bill says.

"The laws of this state shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development all rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens and residents of this state," it says.

In response to that bill, Sen. Jim Wilson, D-Tahlequah, who is strongly pro-choice, offered an amendment that would make the father of an unborn child financially responsible for its mother's health care, housing, transportation and nourishment while she is pregnant.

Wilson's amendment failed.




kalikshama -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 5:01:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Lucylastic, if the sperminator was doing the part of a father, there most likely wouldn't be any financial issues to discuss. If you want someone to help you actually parent, you're going to need to spread it for only those types of guys. Women who spread for the hottest guy, the He-men or the guy with the biggest dick aren't necessarily doing so with how well this guy can be a father. That's not to say that guys are always looking for the gal that is going to be the best potential mother, either. However, if both genders only slept with members of the other gender that would actually make good, responsible fathers there would be far fewer issues


Still waiting for an answer:

A. Is it women that have multiple sex partners that you find deplorable?
B. Or women with multiple sex partners that used contraception that failed?
C. Or women with multiple sex partners that do not use contraception?




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875