RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Real0ne -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 7:17:51 PM)

Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss.

its violates every right you can think of, so yeh lets pass it right away! LOL

Silly bastards will to.



tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 11:28:57 PM)

And how old do you think that fetus is?

Allow me to explain.  According to that photo, its a 9 week old fetus.  Shocking, isnt it?  But its a lie.

The dime itself is,,,, Diameter: 17.91 mm (0.705 in)

A 9 week fetus .... The embryo is now about 1 inch long.

http://www.baby2see.com/development/week9.html

Average size at 9 weeks pregnant -- length 0.9 inch (2.3cm), weight 0.07 ounce (2gm)

http://www.pregnancy.org/fetaldevelopment/week-nine

9 Weeks Pregnant  Baby: The embryo measures about 0.9 inches to 1.2 inches from crown to rump, or the size of a strawberry.http://www.webmd.com/baby/guide/your-pregnancy-week-by-week-weeks-9-12

That fetus is approximately between 15 and 16 weeks gestation...
Week 15Baby: Your 13-week-old fetus now measures about 4.1 to 4.5 inches from crown to rump and weighs about 1.75 ounces.

Week 16Baby: Your baby now measures about 4.3 to 4.6 inches from crown to rump and weighs about 2.8 ounces.
http://www.webmd.com/baby/guide/your-pregnancy-week-by-week-weeks-13-16?page=2


Now, can we guess why they would want to lie about the gestational age?







tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/23/2012 11:58:58 PM)

9 weeks gestation...




[image]local://upfiles/502828/152721A5EFB742179FDE947886EEC86C.gif[/image]



tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 12:19:00 AM)

Do let me know if either decide to put their big boy panties and actually address the questions asked of them, please.



MrBukani -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 12:41:30 AM)

You won the prize T. and go through to the next round of the abortion show.
I thought an absurd question was in need of a gruesome answer.
If this is a real question in the wild west. You dont live in a democracy but a mediacircus run by the Vatican. Or as Jan Hus liked to call it the synagoge of satan.
And the zealous christlovers are starting to use the same tactics in Europe, thank you very much.[:D]



DesideriScuri -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 5:25:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
Still waiting for an answer:

A. Is it women that have multiple sex partners that you find deplorable?
B. Or women with multiple sex partners that used contraception that failed?
C. Or women with multiple sex partners that do not use contraception?


Good Lord. In order of deploration (I'm making the fucking word up, so don't whine about it): C, B, A. B & A are essentially the same since the comment wasn't exactly about whether or not protection was used, but that the gal had multiple partners so she didn't have reasonable ability to know who the father was.




kalikshama -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 5:35:11 AM)

Do you think it's wrong for men to date (and have sex with) more than one woman in the same month?



SoftBonds -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 8:40:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Do you think it's wrong for men to date (and have sex with) more than one woman in the same month?


Um, it can take a few months for a woman to realize she is pregnant. So realistically if a guy doesn't want to create kids by two different women, he would have to have at least a 3 month dry spell between women.
Maybe more (remember that TV show "I didn't realize I was pregnant"?)



tweakabelle -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 12:33:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Lucylastic, if the sperminator was doing the part of a father, there most likely wouldn't be any financial issues to discuss. If you want someone to help you actually parent, you're going to need to spread it for only those types of guys. Women who spread for the hottest guy, the He-men or the guy with the biggest dick aren't necessarily doing so with how well this guy can be a father. That's not to say that guys are always looking for the gal that is going to be the best potential mother, either. However, if both genders only slept with members of the other gender that would actually make good, responsible fathers there would be far fewer issues


Still waiting for an answer:

A. Is it women that have multiple sex partners that you find deplorable?
B. Or women with multiple sex partners that used contraception that failed?
C. Or women with multiple sex partners that do not use contraception?


Kali, are you sure you want answers to those questions? You're just a woman hun. In DS's scheme of things, we don't have sex, we don't sleep with partners, we just "spread it". You know, just lie there and figure out how much we're going to take the guy for in child support while he pumps away ..... If His Lordship's rather confused last sentence makes any sense at any level, it seems to be that women are responsible for their male partner's inability to "make good, responsible fathers". Well of course! How silly of me to think that it might be the man's fault - I must have been having a blonde moment!

Doesn't that tell you all you need to know? We're all just cumbuckets whose sole purposes in life are to act as semen repositories and to take the fun out of sex for guys by insisting that they are responsible for the consequences of their choice to fuck us. Like .... how dare we? Such presumption! Therefore we can't be trusted with any decisions about sex, about babies or any responsibility for our own bodies or reproductive choices. Best we leave it all up to those oh-so-wise, trustworthy, ever-and-always reliable men to make all those decisions for us, in our own best interests...... or so His Lordship deigns to inform us.

We really need to wake up to ourselves and stop interfering with mens' (God-given?) rights to fuck as many women as is their wont, without any responsibility for the consequences. It's OK for men to do it but if a woman has multiple partners, then she's automatically a slut and we all know what sluts deserve (and get)........... according to His Lordship.

It seems that there is no limit to some people's misogyny.



lady4dad -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 12:37:50 PM)

nobody wondering about that it might be a criminal act of battery by itself?????
are some trying to follow the example of Saudi Arabia where they chop a thief's hand off?



Real0ne -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 1:27:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Do you think it's wrong for men to date (and have sex with) more than one woman in the same month?



any mormons want to field this one?



LookieNoNookie -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 7:46:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I can imagine that a lot of the crazies would fall in line behind a movement which says, since they're irresponsible, we need to save them from themselves and prevent them from aborting another baby by taking away their ability to get pregnant.

As long as the crazies think of woman as their own private breeding stock, as evidenced by all their claims, how long do you think before this comes around?



I still say (and no one has come back to debate me on this, ergo, I can safely assume this is a rational assumption) .... sterilize all women except those that look like Pamela Anderson.

I will (because I'm a giver) give my all to impregnate these remaining wimmens.

I do this because I care....and because I'm a giver.

(I do this for you).

I will work weekends for this.....for you.



SoftBonds -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 8:08:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I can imagine that a lot of the crazies would fall in line behind a movement which says, since they're irresponsible, we need to save them from themselves and prevent them from aborting another baby by taking away their ability to get pregnant.

As long as the crazies think of woman as their own private breeding stock, as evidenced by all their claims, how long do you think before this comes around?



I still say (and no one has come back to debate me on this, ergo, I can safely assume this is a rational assumption) .... sterilize all women except those that look like Pamela Anderson.

I will (because I'm a giver) give my all to impregnate these remaining wimmens.

I do this because I care....and because I'm a giver.

(I do this for you).

I will work weekends for this.....for you.

Thank you Lookie, you are so generous
On the other hand, if we used the right techniques, we could mix DNA from any two women and create a fertilized egg. Then impregnate other women with the product created by that method. Imagine 3 billion Pamela Anderson clones being born in 9 months and reaching legal age in under 19 years...
It would be a great time to be alive...



tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 8:30:57 PM)

Gotta love men and their barbie fantasies.



SoftBonds -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 8:42:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Gotta love men and their barbie fantasies.

Point...
But I like all women. Indian (both types), Middle Eastern, Black, White, Hispanic... it's all good.



tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 8:58:52 PM)

Pam is the live version of Barbie... pretty, sure.. sexy as hell... and if you listen to her....



MrBukani -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 9:08:55 PM)

[image]http://celebslam.celebuzz.com/images/pam-anderson-monster-makeup-jump.jpg[/image]


Yikes 3 million of them?
[:'(]



LookieNoNookie -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 9:10:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SoftBonds


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I can imagine that a lot of the crazies would fall in line behind a movement which says, since they're irresponsible, we need to save them from themselves and prevent them from aborting another baby by taking away their ability to get pregnant.

As long as the crazies think of woman as their own private breeding stock, as evidenced by all their claims, how long do you think before this comes around?



I still say (and no one has come back to debate me on this, ergo, I can safely assume this is a rational assumption) .... sterilize all women except those that look like Pamela Anderson.

I will (because I'm a giver) give my all to impregnate these remaining wimmens.

I do this because I care....and because I'm a giver.

(I do this for you).

I will work weekends for this.....for you.

Thank you Lookie, you are so generous



It's been said before (you weren't the first).



tazzygirl -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 9:10:44 PM)

LOL... ok, I was referring to her dolled up form.



Toppingfrmbottom -> RE: Sterilize all woman getting abortions? Pro or Con? Discuss. (2/24/2012 9:14:57 PM)

I'm not a crazie I don't think, but I do think that if someone is relying on abortions to be their birth control and not taking any efforts to prevent preggies, cause eh they can go get it aborted, then eventually someone should step in and stop that. They're eventually going to harm their health so bad that next I am sure they'd be clammoring the system fix them on tax payer dollars, most likely..
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

I can imagine that a lot of the crazies would fall in line behind a movement which says, since they're irresponsible, we need to save them from themselves and prevent them from aborting another baby by taking away their ability to get pregnant.

As long as the crazies think of woman as their own private breeding stock, as evidenced by all their claims, how long do you think before this comes around?



Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875