DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Do you honestly believe that someone getting diabetes is as potentially abusive as a woman having a miscarriage? Seriously? The requirement to report "questionable" miscarriages (though it may not be defined as such and could include all miscarriages) is almsot exactly the same as the requirement to report potential child abuse situations. Excuse me! Having a miscarriage is "potentially abusive"???????? What twisted mind produced such a vile thought? Having a miscarriage is to be treated in the same manner as child-rape? What repulsive morality could even put the two in the same book, let alone the same page? What century are you living in? Are you seriously suggesting that it is reasonable that miscarriages are required, by law, to be reported to the authorities? Why? Is it a crime to miscarry? Since when is pregnancy a matter to be policed by the State? On what basis does the State regulate what happens in a woman's womb? If the State is going to police pregnancies, where does it stop? Why is it that the same people who throw tantrums at the merest hint of any Govt regulation of commerce, who are so quick to denounce any environmental regulation "Big Government", are so happy for the Government to poke its nose into pregnancies and to impose onerous regulations and laws onto women? The implication - that all miscarriages are "suspect" and therefore have to investigated, adjudicated and pronounced either "intentional" or "accidental" by some bureaucrat - is outrageous. This is a gross invasion of privacy, an assault on human rights, and a deliberate attack on the autonomy of women by demented ideologues who want to take us all back to the Dark Ages and reduce womens' status to that of domestic chattel, kitchen slaves, baby incubators and holes-to-insert-erect-cocks-into-for-male-pleasure-only. It displays open unqualified contempt for women - misogyny of worst, most vicious and destructive kind. Not even Saudi Arabia has laws like this. It will make the USA the laughing stock of the world, and a particular hell for American women, many of whom will live in dread of ever becoming pregnant. If you need a second opinion on precisely where you should stick this sick putrid sinister law and draconian morality, please feel free to ask me. Hey, tweakabelle, thanks for twisting my words and not taking my thoughts into context! It does make for quite the entertaining reading! No one said all miscarriages are child abuse. I did say the requirement to report miscarriages in the law may include all miscarriages, and have said previously, that I do not agree that is correct. A woman having a miscarriage because of natural causes (that is, no direct, willful outside forces acted on the woman or fetus causing the miscarriage) should not be reported. However, if a woman knows she's pregnant, and willfully engages in activities with the intent to cause a miscarriage, should be reported, IMO. In those cases, I would have no issue with defining those actions as abuse. The onus to report would be on health care providers. This is who would initially make the initial decision as to whether or not the miscarriage was natural, or forced. Like the requirement to report potential child abuse, there should be procedures and processes in place to make further determinations. Thus, if a pediatrician sees things occurring to a child that could be abuse, he can require more tests to verify or refute the abuse. If the parent does not follow up with the prescribed procedures, or if the results of the procedures support a child abuse situation, that pediatrician has to follow the laws and report you. But, if the results of the procedure(s) do not indicate potential child abuse, the pediatrician is not required to report. So you see the difference?
|