RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tweakabelle -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/22/2012 7:59:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn



quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

http://www.smh.com.au/world/virginias-proposed-abortion-law-akin-to-rape-20120222-1to8j.html




The f*cking proposed and in some places already enacted law itself is nothing more than another legislatively mandated rape, tweaker. Now we have potential for triple rape. Once on the violence itself, then in court as giving testimony to it, and now in court again to defend against legal charges concerning a miscarriage.

Legislative serial gang banging is what I am seeing here.




Thank you Edwynn. You are perfectly correct. Thanks for correcting the sanitised view I inadvertently promoted. Not an image of the USA that any one could be proud of, I imagine.




SoftBonds -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/22/2012 8:05:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

My doctor requiring a procedure is a whole different thing from my legislature requiring a medical procedure.


Technically, they would then be practicing medicine. AFAIK, Ron Paul is the only officeholder authorized to do that.

Wouldn't that qualify as a miscarriage of justice? It would certainly be a travesty of justice!


To be completely correct the following are OB/GYN's in Congress

House

Rep. Michael C. Burgess, M.D. (R, Texas)
Rep. Phil Gingrey, M.D. (R, Ga.)
Rep. Ron Paul, M.D. (R, Texas)
Rep. Phil Roe, M.D. (R, Tenn.)

Senate

Sen. Tom Coburn, M.D. (R, Okla.)

http://www.patientsactionnetwork.com/physicians-of-the-112th-congress/



My party isn't represented in the "horny bastards who get paid to look at women's vaginas"??? WTF?
We need something like Emily's list for Democrat Gynecologists to run for office to even the numbers. Maybe a lesbian one to benefit from both lists?




DesideriScuri -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 4:56:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Oh, and this is the one (insert local Republican Representatives name here) donates time and money to.


This is funny.  Why would any woman who finds herself in a position to need help donate her time to someone whose political platform is based upon not giving her any help at all?



But, you see, tazzygirl, you didn't put my entire quote in there that time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
If they aren't willing, here are the addresses and numbers of local charities that have been set up to do the same thing. Oh, and this is the one (insert local Republican Representatives name here) donates time and money to.


The woman was pointed towards local charities that would be of help, and then also to the local charity her local rep donated time/money to. It wasn't about the woman donating her time to a Republican anything.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 5:11:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

A lot of these people still haven't even realised that most child sexual abuse is child rape, the former being a euphemism for the latter. For example:

quote:

Interestingly enough, "child rape" does not appear in post#48. "Child abuse" does appear. While "child rape" is an example of "child abuse," it is not the only manner in which a child can be abused. Your going to an extreme example and assigning that to me is laughable.
( DesideriScuri post 76)

Unless one wants to argue that a child can give fully informed free consent to sexual activity with an adult, sexual abuse of a child is rape. It would be nice if these people learnt such basic facts before they begin pontificating to women about how they should mange their fertility. Perhaps these people need the euphemism more than most as so many of the "men of the cloth", the cretins who devise their sick twisted moralities, are themselves serial child rapists.

But since when have fundamentalist ideologues ever cared for facts? Or the human rights of others?


Is beating a child, "child sexual abuse?" Obviously, not. Is beating a child, "child abuse?" Absolutely. Sexual abuse is only one form of abuse, regardless of maturity of the victim. Btw, sexual abuse in adults could also be withholding sex from a partner as a punishment.

Unless *all* child abuse is sexual abuse, the two are not interchangeable. When you take into consideration that almost all sexual child abuse is child rape, that still does not make all child abuse, child rape. So, going to one of the most heinous examples of child abuse to make your point is ridiculous and over the top.

Plus, since I didn't limit my discussion to child sexual abuse, using me as an example of someone who doesn't realize that child rape is the most common form of child sexual abuse is nothing more than garbage.

If you're going to argue against my points, I would appreciate you arguing against my actual points.




thishereboi -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 6:17:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I don't think I've ever seen an ultrasound done, vaginally. That doesn't mean they don't exist but I always thought it was those "sensors", placed on the abdomen and that was all. Hardly invasive (unless the lady's stomach is really hairy and the adhesive pulls the hair).



Peace and comfort,



Michael




I have had a few and I have to say. I would take that over a speculum exam any day.




tweakabelle -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 6:46:19 AM)

quote:

Unless *all* child abuse is sexual abuse, the two are not interchangeable. When you take into consideration that almost all sexual child abuse is child rape, that still does not make all child abuse, child rape. So, going to one of the most heinous examples of child abuse to make your point is ridiculous and over the top.


Such naked hypocrisy.

You are trying to justify State policing of miscarriages on the grounds that some miscarriages are "potentially abusive". Of the (probably) millions of miscarriages that occur annually, only a tiny proportion could, using your criteria, qualify as "potentially abusive". This is the logic on which your entire argument is constructed - using a tiny number of "the most heinous example(s)" to justify your case. Your current claim is that such tactics are "ridiculous and over the top." If this claim has any validity, your entire argument fails by the same logic. Your position is condemned by your own words and logic.

The devious and dishonest argument you present would not arise if abortion was illegal. Everyone knows this proposal was initiated because the anti-abortion crowd won't accept Roe vs Wade. So why can't you admit that instead of presenting false, contradictory and misleading arguments, and then having the sheer gall to try to pass them off as based in morality or genuine concern for children. If and when you do admit that, you might just might be in a position to make judgements about the honesty of others. Until this admission is forthcoming, and the real motives for this vile proposal are openly declared, any judgements coming from people advocating this vicious attack on women are simply further exercises in duplicity and hypocrisy.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 9:43:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

Unless *all* child abuse is sexual abuse, the two are not interchangeable. When you take into consideration that almost all sexual child abuse is child rape, that still does not make all child abuse, child rape. So, going to one of the most heinous examples of child abuse to make your point is ridiculous and over the top.


Such naked hypocrisy.

You are trying to justify State policing of miscarriages on the grounds that some miscarriages are "potentially abusive". Of the (probably) millions of miscarriages that occur annually, only a tiny proportion could, using your criteria, qualify as "potentially abusive". This is the logic on which your entire argument is constructed - using a tiny number of "the most heinous example(s)" to justify your case. Your current claim is that such tactics are "ridiculous and over the top." If this claim has any validity, your entire argument fails by the same logic. Your position is condemned by your own words and logic.

The devious and dishonest argument you present would not arise if abortion was illegal. Everyone knows this proposal was initiated because the anti-abortion crowd won't accept Roe vs Wade. So why can't you admit that instead of presenting false, contradictory and misleading arguments, and then having the sheer gall to try to pass them off as based in morality or genuine concern for children. If and when you do admit that, you might just might be in a position to make judgements about the honesty of others. Until this admission is forthcoming, and the real motives for this vile proposal are openly declared, any judgements coming from people advocating this vicious attack on women are simply further exercises in duplicity and hypocrisy.


tweakabelle, I don't support the requirement to report all miscarriages. I would only support the requirement to report miscarriages that a medical professional considers "un-natural." Miscarriages that are considered to be caused "naturally," would not need to be reported. Just like all injuries to a child do not carry a reporting requirement. Only those injuries that indicate possible child abuse situations are required to be reported.

Further, I've already said that abortions are legal and should be accessible to women. Thus, choosing to abort a pregnancy by getting an abortion in a medical center would not qualify as an un-natural miscarriage caused by potential abuse.

Here's yet another interesting wrinkle. Reporting a potential abuse-induced miscarriage isn't necessarily being blamed on the mother. The miscarriage would be reported (if the health professional believes it may have been caused by abuse), including causative factors, which could include physical attacks on the mother by someone else, car accident, possible poisoning, etc.

It wouldn't be all miscarriages. It wouldn't necessarily include elected abortions, either.

But, do continue to try to nail me down to your rhetoric.




Fightdirecto -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 10:32:13 AM)

Here's the problem, in one picture:

[image]local://upfiles/42188/9F726BCF979C41E7837478CDF37B0D60.jpg[/image]




thishereboi -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 10:53:38 AM)

I've had republicans in my vagina, but it was never a problem. Of course they were invited...




Hillwilliam -> RE: Georgia Law Could Give Death Penalty for Miscarriages (2/23/2012 11:37:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I've had republicans in my vagina, but it was never a problem. Of course they were invited...

What a coincidence, Ive been inside a few Republican Vaginas.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875