Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Voice of American Conservatism?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 10:21:07 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardSadisticFun

Yeah Obama needs to talk about the 'real issues' like cell phone towers. My God. Who exactly is Maher bigoted against? Are we about to get a 'pity the poor white man' rant? The last time we had a 'real budget', ie a balanced one, was when Clinton was in office. The last Republican to balance a budget was Eisenhower. The last Republican to not, at a minimum, double the deficit was Nixon.

Tweak, paleos still believe in supply side. If I have to cajole someone to see what should be plain on their face, that trickle down economics doesn't work, then they should just go ahead and stay with the GOP. The Dem caucus has enough BLue Dogs as it is.


lol

Fake Paleo!

There are no Paleos left in the GOP. I mean. Don't you remember when Frum threw all of them out?

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to HardSadisticFun)
Profile   Post #: 141
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 10:33:34 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

If you understood that a woman takes the Pill every day, whether she is having sex that day or not, irrespective of the number of partners she has, why would you call it "her right to subsidized promiscuity?"




A couple reasons, Kalikshama. For one, to highlight that people right here on this planet, with a legitimate stake in the discussion, and legitimate rights to their beliefs, and free expression of them, have differing values, and interpretations of behavior.



Oh...more of "my inalienable right to speak gibberish".......


Can we stick to the topic......?



We all know our rights are and pretending they`re infringed upon is getting old?



In what universe did employers become their employee`s doctors?


Is this going to be part of the GOP health-care plan?


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 142
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 10:34:20 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

If you understood that a woman takes the Pill every day, whether she is having sex that day or not, irrespective of the number of partners she has, why would you call it "her right to subsidized promiscuity?"



A couple reasons, Kalikshama. For one, to highlight that people right here on this planet, with a legitimate stake in the discussion, and legitimate rights to their beliefs, and free expression of them, have differing values, and interpretations of behavior.


Of course you are entitled to your beliefs. I'm looking for the rationale behind them.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 143
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 11:33:39 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

If you understood that a woman takes the Pill every day, whether she is having sex that day or not, irrespective of the number of partners she has, why would you call it "her right to subsidized promiscuity?"



A couple reasons, Kalikshama. For one, to highlight that people right here on this planet, with a legitimate stake in the discussion, and legitimate rights to their beliefs, and free expression of them, have differing values, and interpretations of behavior.


Of course you are entitled to your beliefs. I'm looking for the rationale behind them.


Yes. I too am going to find it illuminating to see how TheHeretic charts the descent from the lofty ideals he claims motivates his posts to the scurrilous deceitful crap (eg "subsidized promiscuity") that actually comprise his posts.

The two are so far apart that I doubt any rational connection can be established.

_____________________________



(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 144
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 11:41:30 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Of course it comes down to the Presidents changing the rule on contraception!!! dontcha know.
Its got nothing to do with the hard christian right seeping pus into the legislature against any woman who wants to decide about their own reproduction and rights over their own bodies.The bills against abortion, the bills for trans vaginal invasion, the bills for personhood rights decimating the rights of a womans own body carrying the "fetus". Nothing at all to do with that, its the loony leftists taking things all out of proportion.
/sarcasm


Ok.. but this particular issue is being created by Catholics who do not like being told what to do. They want to fight this tooth and nail.

Im not sure how many are aware, but prior to this, they only had to provide contraceptives if they provided a prescription plan. No prescription plan, no contraceptives. I would be curious to see if that part of the rule changed.

I respect their beliefs... I also acknowledge that 98% of Catholics use some form of birth control. If they do not have the support of their own members, why are they trying to push that off on everyone else?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 3/4/2012 11:42:01 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 145
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 11:49:22 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I didnt want to attack all catholics, but rather the politicians who are putting forward the doctrine and dogma, in these bills, amendments, refusing to listen to a woman in a hearing, all this is fifty years too late.
Expecting everyone to align with catholic dogma is ridiculous ancient thinking.that they want the right to deny non catholics, especially those that work for them is more egregious than mandating insurance companies cover birth control with 98 % of their own flock use the said contraception. Maybe they would have more truck if 98% of the flock wasnt following their personal rules.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 146
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 11:57:57 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
True, its the Dogma, and those leaders of the Church. And its all about politics, not about religion. Just another argument towards a NHS.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 147
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:00:45 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Yeah well you know how I feel about that:)


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 148
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:05:47 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Proflowers just dropped. Anyone surprised with Easter and Mother's Day coming up?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 149
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:11:16 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Im wondering how many will be back after a month, if not before:)
Carbonite gave it to him:) I liked his comment

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 150
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:13:17 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Pro wont be until after Mother's Day... they could not afford the backlash

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 151
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:15:12 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

Im not sure how many are aware, but prior to this, they only had to provide contraceptives if they provided a prescription plan. No prescription plan, no contraceptives. I would be curious to see if that part of the rule changed.


I thought the only thing that was changing this year from the 2000 EEOC ruling was that under the Affordable Care Act, since contraception comes under preventative care, there can be no copay (?)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions

FACT SHEET: Women’s Preventive Services and Religious Institutions

February 10, 2012

Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, most health insurance plans will cover women’s preventive services, including contraception, without charging a co-pay or deductible beginning in August, 2012. This new law will save money for millions of Americans and ensure Americans nationwide get the high-quality care they need to stay healthy.

Today, President Obama will announce that his Administration will implement a policy that accommodates religious liberty while protecting the health of women. Today, nearly 99 percent of all women have used contraception at some point in their lives, but more than half of all women between the ages of 18-34 struggle to afford it.

Under the new policy to be announced today, women will have free preventive care that includes contraceptive services no matter where she works. The policy also ensures that if a woman works for a religious employer with objections to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan, the religious employer will not be required to provide, pay for or refer for contraception coverage, but her insurance company will be required to directly offer her contraceptive care free of charge.

The new policy ensures women can get contraception without paying a co-pay and fully accomodates important concerns raised by religious groups by ensuring that objecting non-profit religious employers will not have to provide contraceptive coverage or refer women to organizations that provide contraception. Background on this policy is included below:

• Under Section 2713 of the Affordable Care Act, the Administration adopted new guidelines that will require most private health plans to cover preventive services for women without charging a co-pay starting on August 1, 2012. These preventive services include well women visits, domestic violence screening, and contraception, and all were recommended to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by the independent Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science.

...

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 152
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:16:36 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Thats the part Im not sure about. Under the mandate, can they simply drop prescription plans... or is there a requirement to pick them up?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 153
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:16:56 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

Carbonite gave it to him:) I liked his comment


This one?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/03/carbonite-online-backup-rush-limbaugh-apology_n_1318892.html

“No one with daughters the age of Sandra Fluke, and I have two, could possibly abide the insult and abuse heaped upon this courageous and well-intentioned young lady. Mr. Limbaugh, with his highly personal attacks on Miss Fluke, overstepped any reasonable bounds of decency. Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action, along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse.”

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 154
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:18:17 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
thats the one, altho I went to the carbonite site
http://www.carbonite.com/en/blog/A-Message-from-Carbonite-CEO-David-Friend-Regarding-Ads-on-Limbaugh

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 155
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:19:40 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
A 7th advertiser backs away from Limbaugh's show after he calls law student "slut"

By Associated Press, Updated: Sunday, March 4, 2:46 PM

NEW YORK — A flower company is the 7th advertiser in recent days to say it is pulling ads from conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s radio program.

ProFlowers says on its Facebook page that it has suspended advertising on Limbaugh’s program because his comments about Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke “went beyond political discourse to a personal attack and do not reflect our values as a company.”

The company had said on Twitter that posts it received about Limbaugh’s remarks affected how it dealt with its advertising partners.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 156
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:21:05 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
AOL is hiding itself again
*how unusual*
the people at huff n poo are unhappy about it it seems.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 157
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:21:06 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardSadisticFun

Yeah Obama needs to talk about the 'real issues' like cell phone towers. My God. Who exactly is Maher bigoted against? Are we about to get a 'pity the poor white man' rant? The last time we had a 'real budget', ie a balanced one, was when Clinton was in office. The last Republican to balance a budget was Eisenhower. The last Republican to not, at a minimum, double the deficit was Nixon.



Cell phone towers aren't the issue, HSF. Taking away local authority, over local matters, that impact local lives, is a solid, kitchen-table, kind of issue.

Do you watch Maher's show? Do you see the contempt he continually expresses for people of faith? I quit watching because I found it offensive, and I'm not a Christian.

Why does my race matter, in the subjects of my rants?

A budget, period, HSF. You know. As in, a document that presents an accounting the American citizen of how our money is being spent?

Oh, and welcome to the forums.

(in reply to HardSadisticFun)
Profile   Post #: 158
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:21:40 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Nice!

"Over the past two days we have received a tremendous amount of feedback on Rush Limbaugh’s recent comments. I too am offended and very concerned about his comments. Limbaugh’s remarks have us rethinking our future use of talk radio.

We use more than 40 talk show hosts to help get the Carbonite message out to the public. The nature of talk radio is that from time to time listeners are offended by a host and ask that we pull our advertising. This goes for conservatives like Limbaugh and progressives like Stephanie Miller and Ed Shultz. We even get customers who demand that we pull the plug on NPR. As an advertiser, we do not have control over a show’s editorial content or what they say on air. Carbonite does not endorse the opinions of the shows or their hosts.

However, the outcry over Limbaugh is the worst we’ve ever seen. I have scheduled a face-to-face meeting next week with Limbaugh during which I will impress upon him that his comments were offensive to many of our customers and employees alike.

Please know your voice has been heard and that we are taking this matter very seriously.

Sincerely,
David Friend"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 159
RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? - 3/4/2012 12:23:36 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
He is toast

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 160
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Voice of American Conservatism? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094