RE: The Liberal Platform (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 6:17:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

So who wrote this piece of filth, anyway?


Some Dude who like the OP thinks he's the Confucius of the Right Wing I presume

The Right have no time for Confucius, Skip. All of that elitist nonsense about a well ordered and educated beauracracy being essential to the running of a state and merit deserving a reward? That commie crap about citizens being members of their society first and individuals second? Filial piety and respect for one's ancestors?
Ridiculous load of liberal crap, dear boy.




MrBukani -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 6:27:18 AM)

Maybe there is some merit to respecting the past as in respecting the future also, wich has passed once I wrote the word down.
Funny how a word like liberal wich just means freedom is connected to crap.
I wonder what you will twist the word conservative to. I guess a well preserved bonedry ugly mummy?[:D]




Moonhead -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 6:29:53 AM)

I was thinking more of jam...




Lucylastic -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 6:43:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: masternoname

I would have to agree with the lady on this one.

the liberals on cm seem much better at name calling and painting the other side as evil

Now I am not sure that is something I would brag about.......

quote:

You dont appear to be able to inflame as much as you thought


coming from a man who did just that" isnt sure ..bragging is good".LMAO
IeE....
quote:

ORIGINAL: masternoname

thanks for the entertaining post

I am not sure which was better

the op or the reactions to it complete with illustrations of their frustration in post #2

I can actually see the posters doing this as they type

[sm=hissyfit.gif] to fucking funny



Welcome back stranger, are you aware of the new rules , and that name calling posts get pulled?? Which is why most of the neos dont last long, so little self control, even for "dominates".
However please report name calling should you come across some.






MrBukani -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 7:04:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I was thinking more of jam...

Sounds delish. I was thinkin more of this one, nothing personal mind you.
"She is so dumb she stared at da orange juice bottle cause it said concentrate.''




kalikshama -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 8:22:36 AM)

quote:

... and not one of them has found the intentional "mistake" I planted in there to see if they really knew what they were arguing LOL


Like I'd give Internet chain emails that much attention [8|]

This really belongs in Off Topic.




Iamsemisweet -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 8:43:48 AM)

Do you really think anyone reads your posts that closely? Not me, for damn sure
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: masternoname

thanks for the entertaining post

I am not sure which was better

the op or the reactions to it complete with illustrations of their frustration in post #2

I can actually see the posters doing this as they type

[sm=hissyfit.gif] to fucking funny



... and not one of them has found the intentional "mistake" I planted in there to see if they really knew what they were arguing LOL



Peace and comfort,



Michael





MrRodgers -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 9:05:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: masternoname

I would have to agree with the lady on this one.

the liberals on cm seem much better at name calling and painting the other side as evil

Now I am not sure that is something I would brag about.......

quote:

You dont appear to be able to inflame as much as you thought


Please first find me a conservative...and we'll talk. I don't see (read/hear) any. Oh there are those who call themselves right wing and I allow them that. There are those that call themselves republican and I allow them that.

...but no, they are NOT to call themselves conservative, ruins the whole thing.




SternSkipper -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 9:36:11 AM)

quote:

The Right have no time for Confucius, Skip. All of that elitist nonsense about a well ordered and educated beauracracy being essential to the running of a state and merit deserving a reward? That commie crap about citizens being members of their society first and individuals second? Filial piety and respect for one's ancestors?
Ridiculous load of liberal crap, dear boy.


I was referring to they way they try and frame themselves in public debate... presentation language. I actually don't think they have much going on philosophy-wise at all. least not the ones that are most vocal here. Clearly there are still reasonable cons. They just post rather rarely here.
By the way... use "dear boy" only with Doms who CAN'T loan your mistress their copy of "Fun With The Hamilton Beach Electric Carving Knife"[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]




DaddySatyr -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 9:42:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Please first find me a conservative...and we'll talk. I don't see (read/hear) any. Oh there are those who call themselves right wing and I allow them that. There are those that call themselves republican and I allow them that.

...but no, they are NOT to call themselves conservative, ruins the whole thing.



As you (appropriately) point out, true conservatives are a dying breed. Certainly not many still show allegience to the Republican Party because the party turned their back on them and their ideals, long ago.

Much like the word "liberal" used to mean "free-thinker" until the radicals in the democratic party bastardized it, "conservative" used to mean "traditional". It no longer means that.

Now, to be a "conservative" one must look to be a dividing force and to marginalize those with whom they have, at least, the basis for some agreement. They must be so invested in old ways of thinking that their values have become more nanderthal than traditional.

No, the Republicans (with the help of the Democrats) did a good job of allowing extremists to over-take the prevailing tone in the party. Not to be out-done, Democrats (with the help of the Republicans) have pushed free-thinkers out of their party and opted for radicalism.

Instead of both parties realizing that (one would hope) they have the good of the country at heart and recognizing their opponents as fellow warriors, separated by ideals, they have polarized some of their base with them, at the extremes.

I used to be a member of the Republican party. I have been a registered member of the Libertarian Party since 1993. When we are all socializing and we are having trouble coming to agreement, invariably, someone who leans to either direction (but in this case, we'll say the right) will say: "The Republican Party is losing the fight because ..." and someone who leans a bit to the left will counter with: "It's essentially the same for the Dems because ..."

We find agreement that both of our parties marginalized us right into a different camp. More's the pity because as go the "big two", so goes the country and I see evidence of it, all the time. The radicalism that pervades both sides of the Rep./Dem divide has turned a small boundary into a chasm and I doubt that bridges strong enough can be built to make any kind of true governing possible.



Peace and comfort,



Michael





SternSkipper -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 9:50:59 AM)

quote:

Please first find me a conservative...and we'll talk. I don't see (read/hear) any. Oh there are those who call themselves right wing and I allow them that. There are those that call themselves republican and I allow them that.

...but no, they are NOT to call themselves conservative, ruins the whole thing.


They pop up... but usually no more than a post to point out how heinous they think something crafted by one of the so-called cons round these parts. But yeah, there sure is a shortage.




Moonhead -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 10:38:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
I was referring to they way they try and frame themselves in public debate... presentation language. I actually don't think they have much going on philosophy-wise at all. least not the ones that are most vocal here. Clearly there are still reasonable cons. They just post rather rarely here.

The presentation language thing is more wannabe sophistry than anything else though, whereas the great sage is known to us only through his writings. In fact, it's been suggested a few times that if he'd talked a better fight, he'd have had much more of a career in the middle kingdom's government, hasn't it?
(There's quite a few reasonable cons on here, but it's the idiots who draw one's attention more...)
quote:


By the way... use "dear boy" only with Doms who CAN'T loan your mistress their copy of "Fun With The Hamilton Beach Electric Carving Knife"[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

Seen.




Moonhead -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 10:40:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Much like the word "liberal" used to mean "free-thinker" until the radicals in the democratic party bastardized it...

Is that another of your deliberate mistakes, or do you just not have a clue what you're talking about?




subrob1967 -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 1:01:48 PM)

I find it truly humorous that Liberals tell us how us Conservatives think on a daily basis, and hold those beliefs with a religious fervor. Yet when we point out our observance of typical Liberal behavior, we don't know what we're talking about.




pyroaquatic -> RE: The Platform (3/11/2012 1:34:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

I find it truly humorous that Liberals tell us how us Conservatives think on a daily basis, and hold those beliefs with a religious fervor. Yet when we point out our observance of typical Liberal behavior, we don't know what we're talking about.


quote:

us Liberals

quote:

us Conservatives

quote:

us insert affiliate party here


There are many Conservatives that I agree with along with many Liberals that have valid points... but when it devolves to pointless name bickering and deviation from a parties belief structure to the point where...

"Wha wha wha wha.... no U."
"no U"
"NOOOO..... UUUUU"

I'm going to stand and say that most that behave in such a manor have completely forgotten what their party actually stands for-reducing everyone to crawl around like a child. You are adult enough to demand respect but childish enough to expect everyone to level with you on your level.

It turns into a numbered checklist coming from both sides that represents a small portion of individuals rather than a collective party.

Much sadness...

especially when I have known for a while that neither party has all of the answers.

If we were to go the Liberal Route in all walks it would mean giving away everything for the sake of others for the sake of equality leaving the ability to activate any sort of potential at Nil... destroying freedom and the ability to protect one's self from those who are psychopathic and have no care for the dynamic social structure that is complex and shaky. Any one person not in alignment can through the support beams off collapsing the whole damned platform.

Going the Conservative Route in all walks would mean literally starving out others for the sake of keeping things as they were in stagnation. I don't see anyone whipping out their inkwells and candles any time soon and the very people that are starved out will no longer be able to service you-meaning one would have to wipe their own respective asses.

This leads me to believe that no one is what they say they are as people naturally practice both sides of the coin in order to achieve an equilibrium.

Typically-however- self-defined Liberals let the system fall where it may as an organic process. Those weak links in the chain end up fixing themselves if they communicate something is wrong.

Self-Defined Conservatives are like bees. Piss one off (or critique another Conservative in front of a different one) and they can't shit right for a week as a rigid reactionary thing.

Not EVERYONE is like this and these are my personal observations.

If people want to be taken seriously stop acting like dogs tearing into each other mindlessly.




slvemike4u -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 1:42:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

I find it truly humorous that Liberals tell us how us Conservatives think on a daily basis, and hold those beliefs with a religious fervor. Yet when we point out our observance of typical Liberal behavior, we don't know what we're talking about.

Well perhaps you can get your group informed,somewhat,and than we can move on,eh?




subrob1967 -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 2:33:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

I find it truly humorous that Liberals tell us how us Conservatives think on a daily basis, and hold those beliefs with a religious fervor. Yet when we point out our observance of typical Liberal behavior, we don't know what we're talking about.

Well perhaps you can get your group informed,somewhat,and than we can move on,eh?



Oh, we already know how wrong your side is about everything, hence the humor.




pyroaquatic -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 2:52:36 PM)

No one wants to solve a damned thing, do they?

So mote it be.




VideoAdminGamma -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 4:27:17 PM)

Fast reply

I have pulled several off topic posts, replies to those posts, replies to those posts, and so on.

No gold letters yet.

Remain on topic or slight thread drift.

VideoAdminGamma




LoreBook -> RE: The Liberal Platform (3/11/2012 10:21:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I didn't write it but, I did weed out some of the ridiculous stuff and change a few references (for chronology's sake)

1) Drug addiction is a disease that should be treated with compassion and understanding unless the addict is a Conservative talk show host.

2) Women shouldn't be referred to as "twat", "cunt" or "slut" unless she's not a liberal.

3) The United States should be subservient to the United Nations. Our highest authority is not God and the U.S. Constitution, but a collective of tin-pot dictators (and their appeasers) and the U.N. charter.

4) Government should relax drug laws regardless of the potential for abuse, but should pass new and unconstitutional anti-gun laws because of the potential for abuse.

5) Calls for increased security after a terrorist attack are “political opportunism,” but calls for more gun control after a criminal’s spree killing is “a logical solution.”

6) Disarming innocent, law-abiding citizens helps protect them from evil, lawless, terrorists and other thugs.

7) Slowly killing an unborn innocent by tearing it apart limb from limb is good but quickly killing terrorists, convicted murderers and rapists is BAD.

8) Every religion should be respected and promoted in public schools in the name of diversity, so long as that religion isn’t Christianity.

9) Sex education should be required so that teens can make informed choices about sex, but gun education should be banned because it will turn those same teens into maniacal mass-murderers.

10) The Patriot Act is a horrific compromise of Constitutional rights, but anti-Second Amendment laws and Franklin Roosevelt’s Presidential Order 9066 must be regarded “reasonable precautions.”

11) Interning Americans and legal immigrants to make sure that they don't give aid and comfort to the enemy is a good thing (FDR) but interning terrorists and terrorist allies (including those with expired visas) so they can't give aid and comfort to the enemy is a bad thing (Bush-Gitmo).

12) Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky and Natalie Maines are perfectly qualified to criticize our leadership, but Arnold Schwarzenegger, Charlton Heston, and Dennis Miller are just ignorant political hacks.

13) John Lott’s research on how gun ownership reduces crime is "junk science", but Michael Bellesiles is still an authority on why gun control is good (even though he was forced to resign from Emory due to research misconduct over his book “Arming America”).

14) Bush’s toppling the Saddam regime was a “diversion,” but Clinton’s lobbing a couple of cruise missiles at Iraq in the thick of the Lewinsky sex scandal was “sending a message.”

15) A president who lies under oath is okay, but a president who references sixteen words from an ally's intelligence report should be dragged through the streets naked.

16) “The People” in the First Amendment means The People. “The People” in the Fourth Amendment means The People. “The People” in the Ninth Amendment means The People. “The People” in the Tenth Amendment means The People but “The People” in the Second Amendment (ratified in 1791) means the National Guard (created by an Act of Congress in 1903).

17) You support a woman’s “right to choose” to kill her unborn child, but don’t believe that same woman is competent enough to home school or decide to privately school the children she bears.

18) Everyone must unquestioningly support a junior senator with negligible political experience for president. If you don’t, it’s because you’re a racist.

19) All cultures must be treated as equal. This is why we have to make excuses for Muslims when they riot, rape and slaughter, but vilify Christians when they organize letter-writing campaigns or seek remedy through the courts.

20) Being against illegal immigration is racist; ignoring the fact that illegal isn’t a race.

21) Congress must create a “Fairness Doctrine” to counter the commercial success of conservative talk radio and the resounding failure of Air America. (Never mind that we already have a government-subsidized liberal mouthpiece called National Public Radio.)

22) Everyone has the right to disagree, but only if they don’t disagree with us.

23) if you possess a "Y" chromosome, your intent is to subjugate women (unless you're a liberal).



Peace and comfort,



Michael

Garbage.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625