|
BitaTruble -> RE: 141 down and an internal memo against the likes of rush (3/13/2012 4:19:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Tax rates? I realize you think that's a clever point, but I assure you it isn't.
I assure you it is. It points out the fact that 33% is not 'impotent' as a number as you claimed. It's significant. Interesting that you didn't actually answer that question though. Just as interesting as the fact that you didn't answer the first question I asked you when you claimed Obama was going to lose but couldn't point to which of the dismal choices we have left can win without the ability to garner even 40% of the republican base. If you can't garner the attention of 40% of your own base how can you garner the attention and collect 50+% of the general? (Bet you're not going to answer that question either.)
quote:
The current narrative of the libs is that Rush is doomed, conservatives are abandoning Rush Limbaugh, he cannot survive this, blah, blah, blah.
Opinion or fact? Nevermind.. it's just your opinion. No need to answer.. not that you would anyway.
quote:
First of all, I actually wonder how many of that 33% were liberals who thought they could post to the poll in an effort to censor his show.
I would guess that there is also a contingent out there who didn't think Rush had credibility in the first place. Shall we count them as well? You are reaching. There is zero in the way of proof or support for your supposition.
quote:
Rush Limbaugh has a very loyal audience, and considering how much mad dog liberal like to try to silence anyone they disagree with, I sincerely doubt many of that 33% have ever even listened to Rush Limbaugh.
It is not possible if Rush has a 20 million person listenership he claims. I have already shown how every single person in every single market he has would have to listen to Rush in order for that 20 million number to be accurate.. unless you think Rush is lying about his listenership? (I don't expect you to answer that question.. it's too tough, so feel free to pass it by as it won't help your spin here.)
quote:
However, even considering the extremely slim possibility that every single vote taken was from a conservative lets pretend that you own a business a moment. If you want to advertise to conservatives, advertising with 67% of a listening audience is much more advantageous than finding the 33% alternative to advertise with.
Okay. My hypothetical business sells donuts. I order and pay for 10 donuts from my vender. He delivers 7. I'm gonna be a bit miffed at the rip-off. Would you say that I have a right to leave and find a vendor that will deliver on his promise and give me what I've already paid for or not? (Another question that is probably too tough to answer.) If I order advertising from the market with the assurance that my ads will reach 20 million listeners and my ads are not reaching 20 million listeners, do I have fair cause to file a suit for breach of contract or not?
quote:
It doesn't even have to be conservatives. It could be liberals, pet owners, or any group. If you owned a business and discovered that your customers were mostly members of the Occupy movement then it would make a lot of sense for you to advertise on whatever radio station 67% of your local Occu-whiners like to listen to. That would be an economic advantage to you. Advertising your product on a station where only 33% of the listeners smell of urine would not make very much sense if you wanted to stay in business very long, now would it?
Nope, doesn't fly. If I order and pay for 10, I want 10. I don't want freebies.. I'm willing to pay for what I want, but I'm not willing to pay and not get what was agreed to in our contract. Breaking contracts is not the way to stay in business. Rush claims 20 million to advertisers.. he is not delivering 20 million. He will stay or go based on the $ he is pulling in. The $ will start to slow and the bottom line will be affected if he continues to lose support and that's the ONLY thing that matters in business.
If what you say is all true.. then why did Rush apologize after his three day tirade? My guess is that he got spanked by TPTB. I could be wrong though but Uncle Rusty is not well known for making apologies of any sort, yet, here, after a three day tirade, he did. You don't find that odd?
quote:
No, that would not make sense. In fact, it would be as ignorant as your suggestion that this has anything to do with income or taxes.
-SD-
I made no such suggestion that this has anything to do with income or taxes. I directly asked if you if 33% is such an impotent number is it impotent in other areas as well? Simple analogy which you failed to answer and are now trying to spin as distraction.
It didn't work.
I am so far above ignorant that if you have failed to notice such I can only surmise that you are rather ignorant.
I have answered all of your questions and await your answers to mine.. I won't hold my breath though.
|
|
|
|
