DarqueMirror
Posts: 1262
Joined: 3/21/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: 4u2spoil Even if this teen (enough of a distinction from 'kid' for you?) was a professionally trained fighter who somehow managed to overcome the weight difference and land a blow, there's no evidence that it wasn't because HE feared for his safety. Since skittles aren't as effective a weapon as a gun, he couldn't shoot Zimmerman, but perhaps he sees some hulking oaf following him, doesn't know what his intentions are and is trying to protect himself by disabling the guy long enough to get away. Thank you. That's what I was thinking too. But of course that would mean Martin initiated the physical confrontation, not Zimmerman. quote:
ORIGINAL: 4u2spoil The amount of mental gymnastics you're going through on this thread to try to support Zimmerman's bullshit claim of feeling threatened is amazing. Not really, when you consider my original stance. I don't support his claim. I support the assertion by the police that, absent any concrete proof to dispute it, there's little they can do. Think about Casey Anthony. It's widely believed by many she caused, or at least hand a hand in her daughter's death. Yet she is free, found not guilty in a court of law. Reasonable doubt is a bitch. And Zimmermn's case reeks of it. quote:
ORIGINAL: 4u2spoil Considering the numbnuts on this particular police force didn't bother to do any kind of tests, the blood on Zimmerman's head could have been transferred there after he shot the boy, he could have tripped and hit his head - there are any number of ways he could have gotten blood on his head, and no one will ever know because the police didn't bother to even investigate this case to include or exclude any of the things Zimmerman told them. It stinks to high heaven that this guy's claims haven't at least been properly investigated. Because the police, while knowing he could have bloodied himself up, also know there's no way to *prove* that he did. Remember what lawyers love to say -- "It's not what you know or what you believe, it's what you can *prove*." That is how ou beloved justice system works. You can't convict a guy just because you know he did something. You have to prove it....beyond a reasonable doubt.
|