joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror quote:
ORIGINAL: VioletGray From cnn.com: "Phone records show Martin was on the phone with her much of the day, including around the time of the killing, Crump said. He argued that if Martin were really "up to no good," he wouldn't have been chatting with his friend on the phone." Right, because in our cell phone-saturated society, it's unthinkable that someone would be on ther phone while doing others things like shopping, driving or *gasp* being "up to no good." Curious that Mr. Zimmerman didn't reconize the kid was talking on a cellphone. The whole 'hand up to ear' would have been a huge givaway that he was on a phone. Yet, Mr. Zimmerman can tell the kid was black, at night, during a moonless night? quote:
ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror And "around the time of the killing" doesn't mean *at* the time, while advising him to run. Funny....if the person was truly on the phone as this all went down.....why not come out to greet Martin? Just like the whole 'following is pursuing and pursuing is following' bit; His girlfriend states she told him to run away from Mr. Zimmerman. If he wasn't on the phone at the time, how could the girlfriend know that Mr. Martin was sensing trouble? Telepathy maybe? One can see that the time the phone goes dead (celltowers dont lie on that kind of information), is well within the time frame Mr. Zimmerman states he was pursuing Mr. Martin on foot AFTER getting out of his car. quote:
ORIGINAL: DarqueMirror quote:
ORIGINAL: VioletGray Also you need to get off this: There are more ways than punches ton get a bloody nose. Heads can collide when you're wrestling. I'm not sure why you assume that he got all Jean Claude Van Damme on this way bigger guy. No, you need to get off Van Damme. I'm not saying Martin was a martial arts expert. But Zimmerman was clearly bloody. Which means that Martin at least fighting with him. Who says Mr. Martin inflicted any of those wounds? Oh yeah, the guy who pulled the trigger, and stated its all 'self defense'! Yeah, its not self defense if you actively pursue/follow someone AFTER the police tell you to not do so. Further, its not self defense when you possess superior firepower on an unarmed target. Finally its not self defense when you go after someone that is black AFTER stating to the police that 'his kind always gets away' (paraphrasing). Anyone could argue that your judgement was bias, flawed, and uncredible. Further, previous history of making calls to the police show signs of paranoia and delusions, doesnt exactly help the whole 'self defense' arguement.
|