Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republicans "Take Women To Dinner. They Buy Women Diamon


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republicans "Take Women To Dinner. They Buy Women Diamon Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/17/2012 5:42:07 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Once again: The issue is: Do we force - by means of law - a religion to violate its own tenents? Do we violate the sanctity of religious freedom by forcing them - by means of law - to act as a conduit for what they consider to be sin?


We "force" them all the time.

Sharia law
Human sacrifices
Polygamy
Incest ... http://www.rickross.com/reference/polygamy/polygamy25.html
Drug use

None of these are considered "a sin" by their respective religions.. yet they are banned and illegal. So, yes, we do tell religions what they can and cannot do everyday.

Hopefully, someone will show you this. Its a shame you continue on so uninformed.

You forgot about the handling of poisonous snakes in public. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUdc5h10zTo

Probable Santorum voters here.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/17/2012 8:42:28 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

someone PLEASE repost that they DO cover mens vasectomies at PP
he has me on ignore
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/vasectomy-4249.htm
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/centralnc/vasectomy-20843.htm
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/illinois/vasectomy-male-permanent-sterilization-38251.htm

wilful lack of knowledge should be pointed out



_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/17/2012 9:01:37 PM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
........................You forgot about the handling of poisonous snakes in public. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUdc5h10zTo

Probable Santorum voters here.



(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/17/2012 9:38:23 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

someone PLEASE repost that they DO cover mens vasectomies at PP
he has me on ignore
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/birth-control/vasectomy-4249.htm
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/centralnc/vasectomy-20843.htm
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/illinois/vasectomy-male-permanent-sterilization-38251.htm

wilful lack of knowledge should be pointed out



MWUAH

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/17/2012 10:35:34 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
Arent those cancer sticks he is sucking on in his pics??? How much does it cost to treat someone for a preventable cancer and care???

My post earlier got me thinking.. my mother stopped smoking about 20 or 25 years ago.. about a year before she died of heart failure, she had an emergency operation for stomach cancer.. I had to google.. now i see that cancer can kill a person even 30 years after they quit.. So.. that costs insurance companies big time.. the costs of birth control for insurance corps is peanuts in comparision.. I wonder how many of the GOPers are chain smoking them cancer sticks..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 4:36:36 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline 		I wonder how many GOPers support Tobacco Subsidies. And let's talk about Diesel Exhaust and poor kids living in cities getting asthma... Shouldn't we banning these killers from our streets?

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:15:12 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Because it makes the people arguing against it sound like they're making a rational argument, rather than believing that the renaissance and the various forms of social progress that followed it over the next five hundred odd years was a bad thing, I'd suspect.


I really hope this one was overreaching enough to stop the progress of the Dark Ages 2.0 movement.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:21:23 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

People who say that they're paying for other people's insurance premiums are lying.



Not a single person has claimed to be paying for other people's insurance premiums. That's a strawman, pure and simple.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:24:03 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

Why is how much extra it is going to cost only an issue for reproductive care?



It's not. My insurance coverage charges higher premiums for smokers than non-smokers. I think applying that logic to other services or at risk factors would be a fair way of handling it.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:25:49 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

Why is how much extra it is going to cost only an issue for reproductive care?



It's not. My insurance coverage charges higher premiums for smokers than non-smokers. I think applying that logic to other services or at risk factors would be a fair way of handling it.

Except that in reproductive care, men are free riders (so to speak...). Fairly, this cost should be shared.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:26:49 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Except that in reproductive care, men are free riders (so to speak...). Fairly, this cost should be shared.



I certainly am not a "free rider" so to speak, so why should I share that cost?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:28:18 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

People who say that they're paying for other people's insurance premiums are lying.



Not a single person has claimed to be paying for other people's insurance premiums. That's a strawman, pure and simple.

He's talking about the debate nationally, not just in this thread, and yes, more than "a single person" have raised that complaint.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:29:47 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

Why is how much extra it is going to cost only an issue for reproductive care?



It's not. My insurance coverage charges higher premiums for smokers than non-smokers. I think applying that logic to other services or at risk factors would be a fair way of handling it.


Those who get insurance coverage thru a group plan pay the same whether they are skinny or fat or smoke or dont or drink or don't.
You must have an individual plan.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:29:51 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Except that in reproductive care, men are free riders (so to speak...). Fairly, this cost should be shared.



I certainly am not a "free rider" so to speak, so why should I share that cost?

Irony. You just explained what a free rider is.

Ever have sex? Did you chip in for reproductive care?

If you're a virgin, and planning to remain one, then OK.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:32:46 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If you're a virgin, and planning to remain one, then OK.



Yep, first of all.

And second, around here anyways, it's not unusual to see guys being the ones to buy the condoms. :p

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:33:51 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		If that's the extent of your knowledge about female reproductive care, get used to being a virgin.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:35:43 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If that's the extent of your knowledge about female reproductive care, get used to being a virgin.



You're making a big assumption there about my knowledge of female reproductive care.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:39:51 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		I'm really not. And the statement was conditional (look up "if") on your statement.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:44:58 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline 		It seemed an awful lot like a rhetorical conditional, my bad if it wasn't intended that way.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republi... - 3/18/2012 9:56:21 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

Why is how much extra it is going to cost only an issue for reproductive care?



It's not. My insurance coverage charges higher premiums for smokers than non-smokers. I think applying that logic to other services or at risk factors would be a fair way of handling it.


Then you agree that women on birth control should pay less than those who are not... since pregnancy and delivery, as well as the included infant now covered by the policy, adds to the cost.


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rush Suggests GOP Is Not Anti-Woman Because Republicans "Take Women To Dinner. They Buy Women Diamon Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094