LafayetteLady -> RE: War on Drugs "killing our children" (4/3/2012 3:50:28 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrBukani quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady I openly admit that addicts should be given treatment not incarceration. However, "decriminalizing" would also mean that the people who are selling the drugs would not face the penalties they should and that is a problem. As for marijuana, I tend to disagree. In states where marijuana has become legal for medical reasons, the regularion on those medical reasons is laughable, as in anyone can claim they need it for their medical "problem." I admit that alcohol abuse causes problems, but I disagree that alcohol abuse causes more problems that marijuana, and I have seen the problems that both can cause. I disagree that alcohol causes less problems. I could storm this thread with links to support it, but its been done a million times. Decriminalizing personal use does NOT mean its legal for dealers to push haddrugs. And yes the medical shite in America is doing more harm to legalisation then good. Should I say also I see what drugs can do? Why do you think we dont have a crystal meth problem in Holland. CAUSE WE HAVE GOOD DRUGS![:D] You have NOT studied the problems of alcohol vs cannabis, cause most studies support my view. What you have seen in your personal life dont mean shit, sorry to say. Only statistics can tell what is more harmfull. And they all point to one thing. Alcohol is the worst drug. The most related deaths and domestic violence etc. And we can easily disagree with which causes more problems. Of course, here in the States, I would be seeing what happens here in the states a bit more clearly than you. For the record, you really aren't in a position to know what I have or have not studied, are you? Just because I disagree doesn't mean you are correct. The very fact that you think you don't have a crystal meth problem where you live because you have "good drugs" is laughable. Like saying LSD is good as long as you didn't get the brown stuff at Woodstock. As far as statistics go, without seeing all the data (which few ever do) statistics can be presented any way the writer chooses. THAT is something I know quite a bit about having done it myself. Since you are likely only reading articles and reports that support the legalization, there is no doubt the statistics will be spun in that manner. More studies have been done on alcohol than on marijuana. Accepting that alcoholism is a "disease" and that there is an "alcohol" gene doesn't naturally mean that alcohol is more dangerous. There are more people who use alcohol responsibly than irresponsibly. Since marijuana is illegal in the US, there can be no "responsible" use, because it is not responsible to break the law. Even where marijuana has been legalized for medical purposes, there are a great number of people who obtain the prescriptions fraudulently, which makes them irresponsible. Now when you start looking at harder drugs, there is no such thing as using them responsibly, and there is also no "gene" involved in the addiction. We can easily agree to disagree (although I'm sure it is more difficult for you). But just like people who use prescription drugs hasn't stopped them from buying them on the street, legalizing the same drugs isn't going to stop the problems that exist with people using drugs. That's common sense.
|
|
|
|