RE: The wonderful world of stalkers -

RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 10:53:04 AM)
But it wa'ant vitriol, I assure you. An observation. I never inferred that they had piss poor judgement.... ...are piss poor at singling the good guys out from the wanks... That is what I said, and now everybody is reading everything that they can from it. Could I have said that better? Yeah, it was too broad brush for what I was trying to get at. I know the thread started at a cmail stalker, and then went on to other things.... But here is the final on this little bit. You now have me saying (in some sort of fucked up equivalence) that I said "girls are asking for it" and 'the victims of stalkers are to blame.' Yanno, it is seemingly puerile to point out to anyone over the age of 10 that Shakespeare did not say, 'All that glitters is not gold." However, there are a good many things that Shakespeare did not originate that are communicated all the time. (unctuous means oily, or greasy, or smarmy (if you are from the UK, btw) I did not say that anyone on this thread has cried boohoo or played a victim card. Please attribute that to Shakespeare or anyone else, but not me. I had a thought in passing, amongst other thoughts, and people decided to focus on that and impart something into it I had no wish to convey.

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 12:08:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aswad quote: ORIGINAL: kitkat105 Yes. And it gives me the heebie jeebies. I have probably 5-10 that view it between once - 5 times per week. Odeen says they are probably jacking off to my pic. Ew. [:'(] While I've never done that, I'm not exactly clear on why that would inspire an "ew" response. I would find it flattering to have strangers of either sex consider me attractive enough to figure in their fantasies, so long as they don't try to involve me personally in it against my will. Is this the men vs women thing, or am I just odd? Health, al-Aswad. no, you're not odd, and i agree 100%. the "ew" can be a learned immature response. i think it sort of is a man woman thing. it's ew if they're creepy, and hot if they're not. sort of cus i can relate even as a man. this vid should splain it... Sexual Harassment and You ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBVuAGFcGKY [image]http://thumbnails.hulu.com/288/40058288/40058288_384x288_generated.jpg[/image]

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 12:17:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Women, whether they will admit it or not, are piss poor at singling the good guys out from the wanks, they dont want to be lied to, but they most often end up with the silver tongued liars and conmen. They; despite their best efforts; are snatched up by decent guys by pure accident and folly, if ever they are, and not by thier own disgression. .. I sense a little bitterness here.. [:D] quote: hermop yep, have to agree. he's not realizing men suck at picking no more/less than women, and only commiserating from his perspective. i used to have that same thought until reality kicked in. the only diff is the type of lying men and women stereotypically do.

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 12:31:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail But it wa'ant vitriol, I assure you. An observation. I never inferred that they had piss poor judgement.... ...are piss poor at singling the good guys out from the wanks... That is what I said, and now everybody is reading everything that they can from it. Could I have said that better? Yeah, it was too broad brush for what I was trying to get at. I know the thread started at a cmail stalker, and then went on to other things.... But here is the final on this little bit. You now have me saying (in some sort of fucked up equivalence) that I said "girls are asking for it" and 'the victims of stalkers are to blame.' Yanno, it is seemingly puerile to point out to anyone over the age of 10 that Shakespeare did not say, 'All that glitters is not gold." However, there are a good many things that Shakespeare did not originate that are communicated all the time. (unctuous means oily, or greasy, or smarmy (if you are from the UK, btw) I did not say that anyone on this thread has cried boohoo or played a victim card. Please attribute that to Shakespeare or anyone else, but not me. I had a thought in passing, amongst other thoughts, and people decided to focus on that and impart something into it I had no wish to convey. no dude, you're just very one-sided in how you think, so it comes off as sexist. u think men are any better at picking women, and only women fall for lies and shiny things?

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 12:45:13 PM)
No, and did I say that? If you are comprehensionally handicapped, or decide that you are qualified to impute motives to me, based on some clairvoyance you feel you have, hit the circus, it ain't what is happening here. A few people took umbrage, based upon a fanciful interpretation in my wording and meaning, and I may regret the circumstance, but abide the consequence. I will hit a lecture hall if I need instruction.

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 12:56:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail No, and did I say that? If you are comprehensionally handicapped, or decide that you are qualified to impute motives to me, based on some clairvoyance you feel you have, hit the circus, it ain't what is happening here. A few people took umbrage, based upon a fanciful interpretation in my wording and meaning, and I may regret the circumstance, but abide the consequence. I will hit a lecture hall if I need instruction. yes, u did say that. not going to mentally masturbate with u by quoting your own words to throw them back up to you. i read every word. i didn't let my emotions guide any interpretation. in fact, they initially resonated with me, until i realized they were totally one-sided and sounded bitter. if u rly don't believe what your own intended audience believes you espoused, then man-up and take responsibility that you fucked up the message and correct it, rather than focusing on taking umbrage that no one understood u and how right you are.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:07:19 PM)
quote: u think men are any better at picking women, and only women fall for lies and shiny things? Go fetch, there is what you said I said, the mental masturbation thingiec is something you are doing alone, at home, as is your custom. You said I said it, now go hunt it up. Then you have your apology. Now, don't translate what I say, go find that sentence, tell me what post, or something substaintially like it (you understand 'substantially like'?) and quote it for me (you appear to be adept at whole post quotes, now we need the offending sentence) without the what you are really saying, or the this means this because I imagine it does crap, no imputations, no impugnments no inference, no smear or spin..... And I will kiss your ass on mainstreet, and give you an hour to draw a crowd.

PeonForHer -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:22:37 PM)
quote: I am fully aware that some women, as well as men, fall into the trap of being with abusers over and over. As a matter of interest, are there any statistics on that to be found? Are some people more likely to 'attract' stalkers than others? I feel a Google coming on . . . .

littlewonder -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:23:01 PM)
ya know I have men who look at my pic several times a day every day. Turns out that when I do write them and ask them if I can help them, if they do write back, I usually get the same answer "I was hoping you are single now". I just write back and tell them no I'm not. They still continue to look hoping one day they'll be the lucky one to get a chance at me. I just shrug my shoulders and ignore them. It's not hard at all to do. I don't let petty little things bother me. If I let it bother me it's time for me to turn off my computer.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:29:15 PM)
quote: They still continue to look hoping one day they'll be the lucky one to get a chance at me. I So you are saying that all men only want women to fail, and believe your old man is a stalker and abuser, and further; that you are likely to give it away with both hands to anyone who peruses your profile? LOLOLOLOLOLOL. (that apparently is how that translates, but may be different if women say it than men say it)... (my apologies LW.....) I actually understood you perfectly.

PeonForHer -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:30:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder ya know I have men who look at my pic several times a day every day. Turns out that when I do write them and ask them if I can help them, if they do write back, I usually get the same answer "I was hoping you are single now". I just write back and tell them no I'm not. They still continue to look hoping one day they'll be the lucky one to get a chance at me. I just shrug my shoulders and ignore them. It's not hard at all to do. I don't let petty little things bother me. If I let it bother me it's time for me to turn off my computer. Every now and then I'll go off for a perv-search and sometimes at women who, I'll then realise, I've looked at only recently. Occasionally, one of these will write and say, 'Can I help you?' - or similar. I politely reply with something like, 'No, I just popped by for an ogle, that's all'. They've always seemed fine with that. If they haven't been, I've never heard about it.

littlewonder -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:31:13 PM)
hey I'm just repeating what they usually tell me when I write to them and ask them if there was something they wanted other than to jerk off to a blank profile lol.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:38:13 PM)
I am cut (both ways) and therefore shooting blanks, be prepared for me to repeatedly peruse your blank profile, apparently a match made in heaven, n'est ce pas? Finally, a girl and I have something in common, you got rid of that abuser of an old man you got yet?

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 1:45:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: u think men are any better at picking women, and only women fall for lies and shiny things? Go fetch, there is what you said I said, the mental masturbation thingiec is something you are doing alone, at home, as is your custom. You said I said it, now go hunt it up. Then you have your apology. Now, don't translate what I say, go find that sentence, tell me what post, or something substaintially like it (you understand 'substantially like'?) and quote it for me (you appear to be adept at whole post quotes, now we need the offending sentence) without the what you are really saying, or the this means this because I imagine it does crap, no imputations, no impugnments no inference, no smear or spin..... And I will kiss your ass on mainstreet, and give you an hour to draw a crowd. quote: mnottertail Women, whether they will admit it or not, are piss poor at singling the good guys out from the wanks, they dont want to be lied to, but they most often end up with the silver tongued liars and conmen. this very clearly and explicitly doesn't include men, saying it only applies to women. MAIN STREET: i would like the kiss to be on my shoes please.

JanahX -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 2:03:44 PM)
MANY of my profile repetitive lookers - I HAVE had initial messages tossed back and forth - and I've told them with no meshed words, - I am not interested. Yet, they still keep stopping by. I dont know - I suppose because I dont go and look at people over and over again - I think its a bit creepy. Oh and Ron and Karmastic - STOP !!! YOURE FUCKING UP MY THREAD !!!! quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder ya know I have men who look at my pic several times a day every day. Turns out that when I do write them and ask them if I can help them, if they do write back, I usually get the same answer "I was hoping you are single now". I just write back and tell them no I'm not. They still continue to look hoping one day they'll be the lucky one to get a chance at me. I just shrug my shoulders and ignore them. It's not hard at all to do. I don't let petty little things bother me. If I let it bother me it's time for me to turn off my computer.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 2:39:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Karmastic [ quote: mnottertail Women, whether they will admit it or not, are piss poor at singling the good guys out from the wanks, they dont want to be lied to, but they most often end up with the silver tongued liars and conmen. this very clearly and explicitly doesn't include men, saying it only applies to women. MAIN STREET: i would like the kiss to be on my shoes please. Uh, here is the deal MasterConundrum, english is maybe your 15th language, and you are sub-par (to say the least) in your comprehension, so you get some soft talk from me. The way I go to Fargo; I take I 94. (this does not infer that there are not many other routes to Fargo. I never said there were no other routes to Fargo.) (Further; the fact that I remarked on your tortured english comprehension skills does not mean that you are the only non comprehendus in the face of the globe). Try to undertand that declaratives are not all encompassing at your whim, nor are they all exclusionary at your limited understanding of them. The necessary and sufficient conditions for it to exclude men would be something on the order of...oh, I don't know, say, maybe.... EXCLUDING MEN as a DEPENDANT clause in the sentence. You drive 30 mph in a 30 mph zone does not exclude driving 29 or many other speedo readings. Please refer to my example of Shakespeare; earlier. According to your logic if it is so wholesome, it should be inferred that you are a convicted felon for domestic abuse and stalking, because you haven't stated explicitly that you are not. Or would you call that fanciful, flawed, and fuckin inept inductive reasoning, at this juncture? And you have proven that I did not say what you claimed I said. We have a word for that in English. Perhaps you know it.

Karmastic -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 2:47:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JanahX Oh and Ron and Karmastic - STOP !!! YOURE FUCKING UP MY THREAD !!!! quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder k sorry, didn't know the hijack bothered OP.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 2:57:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JanahX MANY of my profile repetitive lookers - I HAVE had initial messages tossed back and forth - and I've told them with no meshed words, - I am not interested. Yet, they still keep stopping by. I dont know - I suppose because I dont go and look at people over and over again - I think its a bit creepy. As one who apparently explicitly tells this guy or that guy that you are not interested... That is actually admirable in my book, of the percent you say you are not interested in, and I expect it is a great deal, because you are interesting, how many of those come back at you after and say: you fake, you lying whore; you man in disguise? And how many of those lookers are maybe pensively looking at your photos and profiles and pensively wishing upon a star, sighing and pining for you, hoping against hope, and all that rot? In correllary (cuz I get skads of them, (invisible profiles who dont show on my whos viewing me that must be repeat offenders) and does that creep you out? I mean this is seeming like women think of this akin to rudely and inappropriately staring at your boobs in public, or even trying to peek up your dress, or do I have that wrong?

PeonForHer -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 3:04:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I mean this is seeming like women think of this akin to rudely and inappropriately staring at your boobs in public, or do I have that wrong? I'm beginning to wonder about the same point. I've always vaguely assumed that looking at a woman's profile here is akin to looking at a woman walking by on the street. Not avidly, mind - not aggressively - just looking, in interest, and maybe appreciation. It hadn't crossed my mind that a woman would feel perturbed by that. Mind you, multiple looks - that would feel rude. Just like multiple looks at a woman on the street, I suppose. Well, whatever, it'd be good to know: one doesn't want to offend.

mnottertail -> RE: The wonderful world of stalkers - (4/17/2012 3:16:22 PM)
But all agreed P. Now if I walked into a local pub, and even if a woman I found attractive and/or interesting (whatever the allure) gave me that eye snap every time (which we cant see here) I looked at her when I came into that place we both frequent........well, guv, I wouldn't be a prick about it, but by god my eyes can light on whatever intrigues them, and if they are having conniptions over it......well, its a big girl pantie day, innit? Because this is not a walk down the street in a foreign place and espy someone once. many of us have histories....often when a woman (especially out of my league, and they are legion) my missive will go exactly like this, (since I know not whatever to say to them) (and for all the non-english speaking here, men look at women too so dont impute anything, and they do answer here and there) : <start> Thank you very kindly for the perve. I assume I have said something on the forums you either found extremely funny, or extremely disgusting. Ron <end> (cuz I will often be damned if I know what else to say to them, but I am a man and gonna say......yanno? cuz, who knows) (many here will recognize that little ditty)

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 [6] 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875