Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

As an Aethist sees it...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> As an Aethist sees it... Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 10:02:36 AM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline 		I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ. They seem to draw on bits and piece and go all in on revelations which...may just have been a veiled referenc to caligula and the fear he wasnt really dead and the persecution woould resume( check verify then challenge)

Social darwinism, hoardingf of wealth, capitalism almost as a tenet of religon and the constant we don't hate the Sinner but....which is mostly just what everythingafter but is. The high incoidemnce of Right wing evangelicals and NRA, Voter ID support( ignoring the predominately white absentee system where actuialoly fraud was found and focusing on id at polls desspite the Bush DOJ spend millions and finding a coupole dozen cases makes it ludicrous to say it's about protecting the vote not suppressing it) The rapidity they spout of about Sodom and use the english translation of the greek transaltion of the aramaic is ignorance on diusplay. I mean really m two pages later Lot's daughters are getting him drunk and committing incest.... did God really destroy Sodom for it's gayness yet being omnificent save the daughters he knew would be ebgaging in incest? Lebiticus is anothe rone they love spoutung it';s the absoulote word yet ignore the passage on then proper way to sll a daughter into slavery on the same page. They also use todays western culture as a reference which ignores the use of mael rape after battle in mesopetamia as an act of primacy and domination of proisoners not sex..... So, I shake my yhead and think yeah but they believe in the ressurection and the teachings of Christ or do they???

They condemn liberalism , act as if christianity was a conservative capitalist supporting dsmall goverment let the poor help themseolves and starving children i n the next town over is compatible with their extrme wealth in some cases..... Christ was a radical subversive who the state put to death because he was a threat to the conservative status quo, he cndemned wealth, he and the Apostles would of fit in just fine on Wavy gravy's commine . they were to each acording to his needs weren't they? Didnt they share all> the idea he would be pro mega church pastors living in grand estates ignores his attitude toward the pofoiteers and charlatons of the temple.


Christianity s great by me I just wish more christiands practiced it..... stepping back
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 11:57:47 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure

I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ.

Trust me, Atheists aren't alone on that one.

K.

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 2:58:26 PM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline 		Its kinda of a good story I think, but could you please edit it. I keep gettin stuck in midsentence. I dont mind the a spelling mistake or twoo. But there are over twenty typos init I guess.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 3:32:42 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ.



quote:

Christianity s great by me I just wish more christiands practiced it..... stepping back


Your first mistake is equating Christians with the teachings of the mega church.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 4:06:08 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline 		This




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 6:48:47 PM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		How do you define atheist? Your story does not have much to do with religion. It is more a criticism against organized church political-economic practices. Is atheism defined as political activism against such practices? Many deeply religious people oppose such practices as well. Jesus Christ as a liberal? Liberalism has been redefined today, Jesus was against oppressive government. 

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 7:09:59 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ.



quote:

Christianity s great by me I just wish more christiands practiced it..... stepping back


Your first mistake is equating Christians with the teachings of the mega church.

I accept the distinction being drawn between those who claim the label "Christian" and those who actually practice Christianity. To me there seems to be an ocean of difference between the Christianity of the New Testament and the practices of the religious Right in the USA, Australia and elsewhere. So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?

There's a broader issue here too. It's very difficult for me to think of a belief system/ideology/-ism where the practice and the things done in the name of said belief system/ideology/-ism match the teachings, where the theory and practice are identical. If this is the case universally, then doesn't this suggest the problem lies in the belief system/ideology/-ism rather than the adherents who claim to put it into practice?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 4/20/2012 7:11:52 PM >

_____________________________



(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 7:56:40 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure

I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ. They seem to draw on bits and piece and go all in on revelations which...may just have been a veiled referenc to caligula and the fear he wasnt really dead and the persecution woould resume( check verify then challenge)

Social darwinism, hoardingf of wealth, capitalism almost as a tenet of religon and the constant we don't hate the Sinner but....which is mostly just what everythingafter but is. The high incoidemnce of Right wing evangelicals and NRA, Voter ID support( ignoring the predominately white absentee system where actuialoly fraud was found and focusing on id at polls desspite the Bush DOJ spend millions and finding a coupole dozen cases makes it ludicrous to say it's about protecting the vote not suppressing it) The rapidity they spout of about Sodom and use the english translation of the greek transaltion of the aramaic is ignorance on diusplay. I mean really m two pages later Lot's daughters are getting him drunk and committing incest.... did God really destroy Sodom for it's gayness yet being omnificent save the daughters he knew would be ebgaging in incest? Lebiticus is anothe rone they love spoutung it';s the absoulote word yet ignore the passage on then proper way to sll a daughter into slavery on the same page. They also use todays western culture as a reference which ignores the use of mael rape after battle in mesopetamia as an act of primacy and domination of proisoners not sex..... So, I shake my yhead and think yeah but they believe in the ressurection and the teachings of Christ or do they???

They condemn liberalism , act as if christianity was a conservative capitalist supporting dsmall goverment let the poor help themseolves and starving children i n the next town over is compatible with their extrme wealth in some cases..... Christ was a radical subversive who the state put to death because he was a threat to the conservative status quo, he cndemned wealth, he and the Apostles would of fit in just fine on Wavy gravy's commine . they were to each acording to his needs weren't they? Didnt they share all> the idea he would be pro mega church pastors living in grand estates ignores his attitude toward the pofoiteers and charlatons of the temple.


Christianity is great by me I just wish more Christians practiced it...


Well, your last line, I concur with....everything that preceded it was, at minimum, convoluted at best, parasitic at worst.

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 8:05:43 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure
Christ was a radical subversive who the state put to death because he was a threat to the conservative status quo, he cndemned wealth, he and the Apostles would of fit in just fine on Wavy gravy's commine . they were to each acording to his needs weren't they? Didnt they share all> the idea he would be pro mega church pastors living in grand estates ignores his attitude toward the pofoiteers and charlatons of the temple.


I'm of the impression that his death had to do with the hate crime he committed at the temple.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 9:54:00 PM   
daddyneedsluv


Posts: 77
Joined: 12/30/2011
Status: offline 		"Wow" is all I can say to this. There could possibly be many great points to be made if it were actually legible. Heck, I'm not sure "Main Stream Christians" could even try to fight whatever this post is meant to argue.

This argument or point just acts as a means to prove your lack of knowledge. Even if you are on the right track.

Knowledge is nothing more than idiocy without proper translation and effective communication.

I would advice editing and letting knowledge lead the way.

Besides that, Kudos to you for speaking your mind.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/20/2012 9:55:10 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I accept the distinction being drawn between those who claim the label "Christian" and those who actually practice Christianity. To me there seems to be an ocean of difference between the Christianity of the New Testament and the practices of the religious Right in the USA, Australia and elsewhere. So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?

There's a broader issue here too. It's very difficult for me to think of a belief system/ideology/-ism where the practice and the things done in the name of said belief system/ideology/-ism match the teachings, where the theory and practice are identical. If this is the case universally, then doesn't this suggest the problem lies in the belief system/ideology/-ism rather than the adherents who claim to put it into practice?


quote:

So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?


Actions speak louder than words... at least for me. My grandmother used to tell me... Not everyone who says glory glory will be allowed through the pearly gates... and none who cry to Jesus only on Sunday will be allowed in his presence.

Its hard to tell... but it is possible. I prefer to judge people on their humanity... their religion is just that.. theirs.

quote:

It's very difficult for me to think of a belief system/ideology/-ism where the practice and the things done in the name of said belief system/ideology/-ism match the teachings, where the theory and practice are identical.


You lost me here. Can you explain please?



_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 2:02:37 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

.............. So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?

......... where the theory and practice are identical. If this is the case universally, then doesn't this suggest the problem lies in the belief system/ideology/-ism rather than the adherents who claim to put it into practice?


If someone has to announce their Christianity, there's a possibility that they're not walking the walk. Believers and non-believers alike can only judge by the fruits of a Christian's faith. Do they feed, clothe, and comfort all in need?

Since we all are human, the execution of our labors don't always come up to 100% Christian. We can all just try to hit the highest mark.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 3:22:29 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

.............. So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?

......... where the theory and practice are identical. If this is the case universally, then doesn't this suggest the problem lies in the belief system/ideology/-ism rather than the adherents who claim to put it into practice?


If someone has to announce their Christianity, there's a possibility that they're not walking the walk. Believers and non-believers alike can only judge by the fruits of a Christian's faith. Do they feed, clothe, and comfort all in need?

Since we all are human, the execution of our labors don't always come up to 100% Christian. We can all just try to hit the highest mark.

This sounds like a very reasonable response hlen5 - thank you. However if I apply it, it seems to me to exclude more or less the entire Religious Right - which would be news to them.

Not only do these people fail the test you proposed - "Believers and non-believers alike can only judge by the fruits of a Christian's faith. Do they feed, clothe, and comfort all in need?" - they actively and deliberately choose to oppose those (both religious and secular) who advocate measures that would meet this standard in areas like social welfare and healthcare.

Can you understand why non-believers might be reticent about applying it?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 4/21/2012 3:25:53 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to hlen5)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 3:46:35 AM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrBukani

Its kinda of a good story I think, but could you please edit it. I keep gettin stuck in midsentence. I dont mind the a spelling mistake or twoo. But there are over twenty typos init I guess.

yeah i can see them now... The thing about an LD with writing skills is you just don't see them till the next day.

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 4:08:27 AM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mupainurpleasure

I find it hard toi connect the mega church right wing evangelicasl movement to the actual teachings of Christ. They seem to draw on bits and piece and go all in on revelations which...may just have been a veiled referenc to caligula and the fear he wasnt really dead and the persecution woould resume( check verify then challenge)

Social darwinism, hoardingf of wealth, capitalism almost as a tenet of religon and the constant we don't hate the Sinner but....which is mostly just what everythingafter but is. The high incoidemnce of Right wing evangelicals and NRA, Voter ID support( ignoring the predominately white absentee system where actuialoly fraud was found and focusing on id at polls desspite the Bush DOJ spend millions and finding a coupole dozen cases makes it ludicrous to say it's about protecting the vote not suppressing it) The rapidity they spout of about Sodom and use the english translation of the greek transaltion of the aramaic is ignorance on diusplay. I mean really m two pages later Lot's daughters are getting him drunk and committing incest.... did God really destroy Sodom for it's gayness yet being omnificent save the daughters he knew would be ebgaging in incest? Lebiticus is anothe rone they love spoutung it';s the absoulote word yet ignore the passage on then proper way to sll a daughter into slavery on the same page. They also use todays western culture as a reference which ignores the use of mael rape after battle in mesopetamia as an act of primacy and domination of proisoners not sex..... So, I shake my yhead and think yeah but they believe in the ressurection and the teachings of Christ or do they???

They condemn liberalism , act as if christianity was a conservative capitalist supporting dsmall goverment let the poor help themseolves and starving children i n the next town over is compatible with their extrme wealth in some cases..... Christ was a radical subversive who the state put to death because he was a threat to the conservative status quo, he cndemned wealth, he and the Apostles would of fit in just fine on Wavy gravy's commine . they were to each acording to his needs weren't they? Didnt they share all> the idea he would be pro mega church pastors living in grand estates ignores his attitude toward the pofoiteers and charlatons of the temple.


Christianity is great by me I just wish more Christians practiced it...


Well, your last line, I concur with....everything that preceded it was, at minimum, convoluted at best, parasitic at worst.

yeah, as I said I do have an LD related to written communication. I acccept it is dense and difficult to read. i would be very interested in specifics of where I was parasitic or where I employed a false logic, straw man or any other failing in my argument other than my pitiful writing skills. This is n't for you per se but, the irony of aethists is we are the most knowledgeable of any general gorup about religon because not believeing is not the same as not seeking http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/09/28/atheists-jews-mormons-top-u-s-religious-knowledge-poll-christians-trail/ i think questioning leads to knowledge and faith sometimes means the absence of a need to question. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/from-jesus-socialism-to-capitalistic-christianity/2011/08/12/gIQAziaQBJ_blog.html Ironic when folks hung up on a hcr bill as redistributive worship at the alter of it's strongest proponent...........in the nutshell My arguemtn is best made here. I resorted to google they have articles form those who arent semi literste lol http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/from-jesus-socialism-to-capitalistic-christianity/2011/08/12/gIQAziaQBJ_blog.html Where does it argue the poor and the sick are not my problem and where is it pro capitalist, low tax and anti helping the poor?

< Message edited by Mupainurpleasure -- 4/21/2012 4:47:05 AM >

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 4:33:00 AM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

How do you define atheist? Your story does not have much to do with religion. It is more a criticism against organized church political-economic practices. Is atheism defined as political activism against such practices? Many deeply religious people oppose such practices as well. Jesus Christ as a liberal? Liberalism has been redefined today, Jesus was against oppressive government. 
See i would be interested in examples of liberalism as oppressive goverment that weren't reflective of christ's teachings.
Do you mean HCR and the oppression of millions of sick people by giving them equal access to healthcare?
Do you mean wlefare and the taking of my taxes and giving children the bare minimum to live on as oprression and anti christian?
Is it clean water or clean air laws that prevent death and suffering as once occurred?
Do you mean social security and the end of elderly poiverty which had been over 70 percent because it costs you money?

I would love to know your definition of oppression.If it is a libertarian ideal that's great but the idea of only being responsible for self is antithesis to the teachings of christ on poverty and the poor

if it was simply hostility to taxes and hostility to taxes being used to help others. I guess if a libertarian that would be true but as a christian it wouold mbe hyoicrisy to say you believed in something then say the mechanism that makes it possible is oppression requires you ignore the cognitive dissonance needed to maintain conflicting moral values.

Aethism has a definition and meaning if I gave it a different one it would no longer be aethism. For all my failings with the written word I do understand they are what they are and they have fixed meanings. Aethism doesnt preclude me from thinking a society that cared for the least of us is a a utipian ideal I can get behind and second to the ressurection which to an aethist is a fictional myth the most reoccurring new testament theme

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 4:39:55 AM   
MrBukani


Posts: 1920
Joined: 4/18/2010
Status: offline 		I thought it must be something like that but your posts now are way better. Thanks. Kudo's!
Keep up the good work.

< Message edited by MrBukani -- 4/21/2012 4:41:59 AM >

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 6:12:08 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline 		I think the reference to oppressive government might be in relation to a verse from Mathew:22:17-21. It says ...

quote:

Mathew 22

"17 Tell us therefore what dost thou think? Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not? 18 But Jesus knowing their wickedness, said: 'Why do you tempt me, ye hypocrites?' 19 'Shew me the coin of the tribute.' And they offered him a penny. 20 And Jesus saith to them: 'Whose image and inscription is this? 21 They say to him: 'Caesar's'. Then he saith to them: 'Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God, the things that are God's.'."



You see, to a Christian (and Jesus' words aren't even open for misinterpretation, here), it isn't proper to give government more (importance, authority, control, "worship") than what it deserves in the hierarchy of the world/universe.

There is a tendency amongst many "non-believers" to make government a lot more important than it should be; almost a religion unto itself. Something which is evidenced by the liturgy-like talking points without which most PPLs are at a loss to make any kind of argument.

By slowly eroding the other faiths, government is becoming the new religion. May God have mercy on all of us, if that happens.



Peace and comfort,



Michael

< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 4/21/2012 6:13:50 AM >

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MrBukani)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 6:26:59 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

.............. So how can we non-believers identify 'real' Christianity and those who practice it without appearing to be arrogant?

......... where the theory and practice are identical. If this is the case universally, then doesn't this suggest the problem lies in the belief system/ideology/-ism rather than the adherents who claim to put it into practice?


If someone has to announce their Christianity, there's a possibility that they're not walking the walk. Believers and non-believers alike can only judge by the fruits of a Christian's faith. Do they feed, clothe, and comfort all in need?

Since we all are human, the execution of our labors don't always come up to 100% Christian. We can all just try to hit the highest mark.

This sounds like a very reasonable response hlen5 - thank you. However if I apply it, it seems to me to exclude more or less the entire Religious Right - which would be news to them.

Not only do these people fail the test you proposed - "Believers and non-believers alike can only judge by the fruits of a Christian's faith. Do they feed, clothe, and comfort all in need?" - they actively and deliberately choose to oppose those (both religious and secular) who advocate measures that would meet this standard in areas like social welfare and healthcare.

Can you understand why non-believers might be reticent about applying it?



So your saying that the religious right doesn't give to charities? They don't help the poor or homeless? Now I know for a fact that there are a lot of christian organizations out there who contribute a lot of money to help others. Do you have any kind of proof that it is only liberal christians doing so?

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: As an Aethist sees it... - 4/21/2012 7:06:20 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		Rather than religious leaders or civilians, I believe she is referring to religious politicians such as Paul Ryan who seek to cut aid to the poor.

Rep. Paul Ryan spars with US bishops over criticism of budget cuts

...On Tuesday, the bishops sent the fourth in a series of letters to the House and Senate criticizing the House-passed budget for failing to meet certain “moral criteria” by disproportionately cutting programs that “serve poor and vulnerable people.” The letter criticized cuts in the Ryan budget to food stamps and other assistance programs for the poor.

The letters also pressured some House committees to maintain current low-income assistance programs.

The letters follow Ryan’s comments last week that his Catholic faith shaped the budget he authored. He also argued the budget is consistent with Catholic teachings.

In a letter sent to the House Agriculture Committee on Monday, Bishop Stephen Blaire, Chairman of the USCCB Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, singled out food stamp programs, urging lawmakers to reject “unacceptable cuts to hunger and nutrition” programs for “moral and human reasons.” He said spending cuts should instead be made to subsidy programs that “disproportionately go to large growers and agribusiness.”

“Cuts to nutrition programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment,” said the letter, signed by Bishop Stephen Blaire. “These cuts are unjustified and wrong.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/222591-rep-paul-ryan-spars-with-us-bishops-over-budget

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> As an Aethist sees it... Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109