CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP Indeed, I am not allowed to submit to anyone other than him. So me calling anyone else Sir or Master would be a violation of his rules. Now if they call themselves Sir James, I will call them James, or SJ. But I will not submit in any way to someone who does not have the right and the authority to dominate me. Which you don't. See, now -this- I just don't understand. If someone's name (even if it is a nick) is "Sir James", why the heck not just call him Sir James? Shoot, I'm a d-type and -I- would use his proper (chosen) name (nick) in correspondence/conversation, until such time as he either responded by signing 'James' or said "Please, just call me James." That is basic, common courtesy. People get so hung up on these titles. It doesn't matter -what- you call someone. What matters is what you do in your relationship with them. I could call someone Master Dodo, but they wouldn't be my master, because I would not be submitting to them... the Nick does NOT make the Master, and behaviors like this make it appear like there is some -validity- to the idea that what a person calls -hirself- infers some level of automatic submission, when it doesn't. A person can call hirself whatever xhe wants, and xhe can be addressed by whatever name or nick xhe chooses, and unless a person actually says "I submit to you", the name is completely irrelevant!
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 11/3/2008 3:41:01 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|