RE: I am so stupid. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Karmastic -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:21:42 PM)

lol - not bright enough, or not observant enough. yes, i can do stupid things too; and that's not a feature i've seen on any boards. are you saying you weren't referring to me as being on a high horse? why even say you weren't replying to me when the gestalt was that you were still talking about me, and naturally, i responded to someone saying i'm on a high horse.

i agree it's all how a person reads a post. someone might also take being not so indirectly called 'not bright' as an insult.

i'm fine with leaving it at that, or you can reply. i'm sure neither of us care much at this point.

EDIT: i appreciate the desire to save space, but still suggest that you use quotes. this has happened before, where you're obviously replying to me, but your tone is like you're saying something that's disputing some specific thing i've said, but didn't.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:40:50 PM)

[sm=banghead.gif][sm=banghead.gif][sm=banghead.gif]





Karmastic -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:46:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

[sm=banghead.gif][sm=banghead.gif][sm=banghead.gif]

<[ Message edited by JstAnotherSub -- 4/29/2012 2:42:09 PM >

you had to edit that?

and your last post looked like Frankenstein until you cleaned up the quotes.

phail




MissImmortalPain -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:47:12 PM)

I already said this but....NOT a high horse, beating a horse to death < they mean two different things.

The not bright thing was inspired by you but not just about you. A lot of people are not "bright" enough to get a point.

This has not happened before. Unless you mean that you got put off over something I said. I reponded to Aswad as is clear at the lower right corner of my post. Every time I have responded to you it has said "in reply" to you in the lower right corner. I still think it clogs up the boards to quote everything. If it bothers you that I won't do it then just don't respond to me....maybe I'll learn something.

On an off note. Could you explain to me what tone you are reading into my posts? I have never been able to figure out how it is that people think they know what is on someone elses mind via the net. I really would like to know how to do this if you could help me out. Thanks.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:48:30 PM)

The post you said I cleaned up was not edited, except maybe in your head.

This one I had to edit cause it put the emoticon on there about 30 times.




Karmastic -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:50:59 PM)

thanks for clearing that up, i didn't see the change from high to dead.

sure, i will do that in private




Karmastic -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:53:13 PM)

lol, now you're acting like I care about what you post.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 2:58:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Karmastic

lol, now you're acting like I care about what you post.

Yeah, wtf would I get that idea from huh?

Silly girl, I am!




Karmastic -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 3:08:11 PM)

See what happens when you think [:D]




MissImmortalPain -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 3:13:28 PM)

I will be sure to check the other side for a msg explaining how it is done.




LadyPact -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 4:01:52 PM)

So, back to the original topic.........

Since I am one of the folks with the 20,000 posts (why do people think that's some kind of negative remark?) who is not involved in anyway as a professional and/or findomme, I can say that isn't the issue, OP.  If people are bugging you for pay for play, at least they aren't bothering anyone else.  That part of your original does come up around here every so often when a female just can't understand why they are receiving the types of messages that they do and it's compared to their screen name or profile pic.  When makemeurfuktoy can't understand why she's deluged with messages from men looking for a cum dump, most of the posters will show her the 'duh' of the situation.

I do happen to be one of the posters around here who doesn't care so much about gender.  If somebody has a close up of their ass as their main profile pic, I don't care if they are a man or a woman.  Telling men that bent over ass shots aren't what female Dominants want to see, shouldn't be any different if the poster is a woman.  Anything else is hypocritical.

Due to some of your kinks in particular, I think you are used to people treating you a certain way and accepting of the way you treat them.  It's something that happens in the vanilla world when a woman gets used to the preferential treatment they receive from males because the men are thinking with their dick and hoping to tap someone's ass.  In the kink world, it's called Top's Disease because female Dominants will sometimes get it into their head that their shit doesn't stink, just because of the way male submissives bend over backwards for them.  That doesn't work on Me because I'm a straight chick and therefore, I'm going to treat you just like everybody else.  Your body parts aren't lined with gold and to Me, are no different than the other three billion people on the planet who have them.

Granted, I get that you use those body parts to help entice people to selling the e-books, traffic to the blogs, etc.  Not really My concern.  Hey, I hope that the link in My sig line gets people to the three day lifestyle event where I will be presenting for in June.  I don't make a dime off of that, where you are doing yours for personal gain.  From what you've seen from the site, I'm sure you've noticed that a lot of people have issues with that.  I don't happen to be one of them.

Back to the dig on the 20,000 posts and/or lack of creation.  Have you ever considered that if you weren't writing things to sell, and perhaps wrote them here instead, your post count might be higher?  I realize you don't want to write your thoughts for free where you are getting an income, but if you had posted all of those things here, how high would your count be?

My last original thread was basically written out of boredom waiting for wax to solidify for the paraffin candles I was making.  Another was about social Dominance, and of course, I put in an Upcoming Event for NE3.  I can't tell you how many Positive Experience threads I've written over the years.  I think I'm covered.




PeonForHer -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 4:57:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland
So, whenever an infrequent female visitor stops by, or a new attractive female joins, they see it as an incursion on their "turf", because they assume (incorrectly) that its just another charge by the minute Domme.


Now Vanessa, I think there are two excellent reasons why any criticisms I offer of your behaviour here can't easily be cast into the box of 'jealous unattractive Domme'. Firstly, I'm not a Domme, nor even dominant, still less a female. Secondly, I'm more attractive than you are and have a better figure. I thought we might just as well get those points out of the way, first. No offence. [:)]

The women here *do*, quite frequently, rip each other to shreds. The men do, too, of course. However, the two sexes play by slightly different rules. For instance, it seems to me that what's considered below the belt, when women fight, is to claim that someone is only attacking you because of your attractiveness. It also seems to be somewhat low to suggest that a woman has lesbian interests in you. That in particular makes me shudder.

As I say, the rules are different in women's spats to the way they are between men. I have to say I don't understand those 'female rules' all that well. But I also have to say: I really, *really* get turned off by women who, to me, act in a schoolgirlish way. I don't 'do' the bratty teen thing. It kills my submale buzz, to be honest. You are not, by any means, the only woman who acts this way here - but, recently, you've shown it more obviously than most.

Please don't. It's disappointing. I can put up with all sorts of things from femdoms, but I can't put up with 'tawdry'.




Aswad -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 5:33:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain

When you guys aren't around we talk to each other like this all the time.


Feel free to talk to each other like this when I'm around, too.

quote:

*bangs a drum and throws nickles* Take off your clothing boy. That drum means we "girls" agree on one of the few things men are good for. [;)]


Ooh... nickles... does this mean the rest will be paid in goods?

Cause after perving your profile I can think of a whole shopping list we might both enjoy. [:D]

IWYW,
- Aswad.





Aswad -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 5:39:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Secondly, I'm more attractive than you are and have a better figure. I thought we might just as well get those points out of the way, first. No offence. [:)]


Hate to burst your bubble, Peon, but if the avatar pics are accurate, her legs beat your abs in my book.

Which is not to say that I fail to see why the ladies are sporting a "waiter, I'll have some of that" look whenever you're around. [;)]

IWYW,
- Aswad.




PeonForHer -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 6:33:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
Hate to burst your bubble, Peon, but if the avatar pics are accurate, her legs beat your abs in my book.



Poppycock. You can't see properly because that Norwegian snow's just covered your screen again. Frankly, I think you should all stop trying to make your roofs out of beard-shavings.




Aswad -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 7:11:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Frankly, I think you should all stop trying to make your roofs out of beard-shavings.


But we're so close to perfecting the weave! [:D]

IWYW,
- Aswad.




TNDommeK -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 7:58:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland
So, whenever an infrequent female visitor stops by, or a new attractive female joins, they see it as an incursion on their "turf", because they assume (incorrectly) that its just another charge by the minute Domme.


Now Vanessa, I think there are two excellent reasons why any criticisms I offer of your behaviour here can't easily be cast into the box of 'jealous unattractive Domme'. Firstly, I'm not a Domme, nor even dominant, still less a female. Secondly, I'm more attractive than you are and have a better figure. I thought we might just as well get those points out of the way, first. No offence. [:)]

The women here *do*, quite frequently, rip each other to shreds. The men do, too, of course. However, the two sexes play by slightly different rules. For instance, it seems to me that what's considered below the belt, when women fight, is to claim that someone is only attacking you because of your attractiveness. It also seems to be somewhat low to suggest that a woman has lesbian interests in you. That in particular makes me shudder.

As I say, the rules are different in women's spats to the way they are between men. I have to say I don't understand those 'female rules' all that well. But I also have to say: I really, *really* get turned off by women who, to me, act in a schoolgirlish way. I don't 'do' the bratty teen thing. It kills my submale buzz, to be honest. You are not, by any means, the only woman who acts this way here - but, recently, you've shown it more obviously than most.

Please don't. It's disappointing. I can put up with all sorts of things from femdoms, but I can't put up with 'tawdry'.



This^^ (even though he doesn't talk to Me,lol because I look like his sister)

In response to the OP.. you know I would say that as far as looks goes, you have to play the hand you are dealt. That being said, I'm sure having a shitty attitude doesn't help.




Killerangel -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 8:24:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VanessaChaland
I am so stupid


Yes, yes you are. Thank you for getting that out in the open. Now see if you can't do something about the passive aggressive nastiness that permeates your posts and we'll be getting somewhere. So glad you've caught on to the fact that you need to do something about it [:D] Admitting your shortcomings in intelligence wasn't what I expected for a first step but it's a decent place to start.




littlewonder -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 9:21:29 PM)

hahahahahahahahaaaaa.....see this is why I love this place. The entertainment of trainwrecks is just too much fun to stay away.




LadyConstanze -> RE: I am so stupid. (4/29/2012 9:38:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

hahahahahahahahaaaaa.....see this is why I love this place. The entertainment of trainwrecks is just too much fun to stay away.




To be honest, the OP's statement reminds me a lot of this




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875