RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message

PeonForHer -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:11:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

A fine person. Loved her thighs.


Hoh yes. Do you remember the (quite serious) discussion that took place on the question of whether she'd be capable of cracking a man's head between them? She was too modest to say 'yes', of course. Heh.



peppermint -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:12:40 PM)

quote:

Good point. But, I've gone through some of their websites and they say that they keep them at their homes.


(pats you on your poor little innocent head)  Do you believe everything you read on the internet? 



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:23:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69


quote:

ORIGINAL: peppermint

Let's see.  Many financial dominants run their businesses via the internet.  They never meet with anyone face to face.  So why would it matter either way?


Good point. But, I've gone through some of their websites and they say that they keep them at their homes.



I guess they also build a bigger home with all their superhuman strength... Seriously, physical strength has NOTHING to do with dominance. Sounds you have a fetish for muscle woman, totally legitimate, but maybe you want to browse galleries of female body builders to get your jollies off, I'm sure quite a few would also give you a domination session, seems like muscle worship is a big fetish.


You just simply had to say that physical strength has nothing to with it. Why add bullshit like I have a fetish or something? It's not like I'm saying that I'm right and your wrong. I just stated that I've visited their websites and read their statements about slaves. I'm not saying it's a fact that Mistresses are suppose to have physical strength. If you're gonna get offended then stop answering my questions. It's an open question. You don't need to answer it. In fact, don't answer any of my questions anymore. Don't even talk to me.



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:25:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: peppermint

quote:

Good point. But, I've gone through some of their websites and they say that they keep them at their homes.


(pats you on your poor little innocent head)  Do you believe everything you read on the internet? 


Lol. No. I'm just saying.



LadyHibiscus -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:30:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

A fine person. Loved her thighs.


Hoh yes. Do you remember the (quite serious) discussion that took place on the question of whether she'd be capable of cracking a man's head between them? She was too modest to say 'yes', of course. Heh.



I would love to be on a tag team with her. We'd wipe the floor with our opponents.



MissImmortalPain -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:32:38 PM)

Nicebutmeangirl gave you a very good answer though personally I believe that a woman should try to be as close to equally as strong as a person she is going to dominate. Or anyone else she is going to let in her home for that matter(the world is a dangerous place now) If you are only asking about online domming then, no, it really doesn't matter most of the men that deal with those ladies will never meet them face to face anyway.



FriendlyMuppet -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:35:59 PM)

We scientists here at the Financial Domination Academy just completed a quantitative analysis involving fudiciary response algorithms and determined that using the following formula:

f(x)=a_0+∑_(n=1)^∞▒(a_n cos⁡〖nπx/L〗+b_n sin⁡〖nπx/L〗 )

Where x = length of service to the dominatrix, a = experience of the dominant in extracting income from said submissive, and L = an additive expression of how long the service has been in place, specifically determining whether or not the submissive has figured out said dominant is or is not full of shit, using the following equation for determination:

(1+x)^n=1+nx/1!+(n(n-1) x^2)/2!+⋯

Of course if n approaches infinity, meaning slave has paid more money than he or she can afford, then you might have to include Placque’s Constant. For that, we’d have to use quantum expressions involving Schroedinger’s Cat, and you know how much that cat gets annoyed when its not fed. Plus, who can ever tell if he’s really in or not in the box anyway?

Now, if Schroedinger's Cat is not yet annoyed, then all you have to do is then weigh the said dominant versus the said submissive, and if the number approaches +- 3.217 ohms, then the dominant does not have be stronger. If it does not approach said number, then she does.



PeonForHer -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:36:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain

Nicebutmeangirl gave you a very good answer though personally I believe that a woman should try to be as close to equally as strong as a person she is going to dominate.


Surely that's unrealistic for most women who are dominating men?



MissImmortalPain -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:39:49 PM)

I used the word "personally" for a reason...and I'm not most women.



TNDommeK -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:45:38 PM)


Peppermint said many fin Dommes don't meet face to face. This may be true for some, however in response to the OP, I have a rather large armed man that comes to sessions with Me. He sits in another room of My place and relaxes, until I need him. So to answer your question, I don't have to be stronger...He is big enough. Or perhaps with your frequent postings about strength, you'd like to meet with him? Quite frankly I'm with JanahX on this one, your posts are starting to take a pattern.



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:48:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK


Peppermint said many fin Dommes don't meet face to face. This may be true for some, however in response to the OP, I have a rather large armed man that comes to sessions with Me. He sits in another room of My place and relaxes, until I need him. So to answer your question, I don't have to be stronger...He is big enough. Or perhaps with your frequent postings about strength, you'd like to meet with him? Quite frankly I'm with JanahX on this one, your posts are starting to take a pattern.


This is a general question. It doesn't even concern me.



TNDommeK -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 5:54:51 PM)

Then why did you ask it?



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:06:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

Then why did you ask it?


Why can't I?



LadyConstanze -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:09:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69


You just simply had to say that physical strength has nothing to with it. Why add bullshit like I have a fetish or something? It's not like I'm saying that I'm right and your wrong. I just stated that I've visited their websites and read their statements about slaves. I'm not saying it's a fact that Mistresses are suppose to have physical strength. If you're gonna get offended then stop answering my questions. It's an open question. You don't need to answer it. In fact, don't answer any of my questions anymore. Don't even talk to me.


Wow, I need your permission now to how I answer a question? And I wasn't offended, but the fact that you keep asking stupid questions about physical strength makes me suspect you do have a fetish, now you don't like my answer, cool, go and knock yourself out, or stop asking stupid stuff and stop typing with one hand...



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:19:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69


You just simply had to say that physical strength has nothing to with it. Why add bullshit like I have a fetish or something? It's not like I'm saying that I'm right and your wrong. I just stated that I've visited their websites and read their statements about slaves. I'm not saying it's a fact that Mistresses are suppose to have physical strength. If you're gonna get offended then stop answering my questions. It's an open question. You don't need to answer it. In fact, don't answer any of my questions anymore. Don't even talk to me.


Wow, I need your permission now to how I answer a question? And I wasn't offended, but the fact that you keep asking stupid questions about physical strength makes me suspect you do have a fetish, now you don't like my answer, cool, go and knock yourself out, or stop asking stupid stuff and stop typing with one hand...


No, you don't need my permission and also it's not your obligation to answer my question. If you don't want to..you don't have to.. How is this a stupid question? I just asked a general question about Mistresses in a "Ask a Mistress" forum. What did I do wrong here? If you don't like my question then why come here and verbally insult me in front of everyone?



LadyPact -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:27:20 PM)

I'm voting with "thinly veiled attempt to discuss the same kink with a different twist".  Really, OP, that is all you did.  Just added the bit about financial domination to discuss physical strength/take downs.  I haven't cast My vote yet on who is really supposed to be stupid in this little game.

Now, OP, I'm going to try to help you out.  Here's a very simple rule of business.  Advertising of any sort (such as a web page for a pro) is supposed to entice customers.  In this scenario, that means selling certain fantasies that people are willing to buy.  For many clients, part of the fantasy is to dream of living full time with their professional.  Ergo, you will see a reference to fueling such fantasies on some websites.

Here's another bit of help.  You are coming off as what is frequently called a one trick pony.  That is somebody who has one particular kink or fetish that they are so focused on that it conveys that kink/fetish is more important than the woman that they are engaging in the activity with.  This is a huge turn off for women and explains your problem with not being able to meet anybody willing to engage in these activities with you.  I'm willing to bet that if I go back and look for any other prior threads you've started, they are related to take downs.

For definition, a take down scene is the concept that one person will physically overpower the other.  In other words, physically forcing them to submit.  It's usually associated with play rape scenarios, but not always.  You'll often find that female submissives are very open to discussing how much of a turn on this can be for them with their male Dominants.  Some male submissives love the idea just as much.  Let's face it.  There are a lot of males who would love a woman to pin them down for wild, crazy monkey sex.  It's the same drive.  Males also want to be forced, taken, used, rode hard and put away wet.

This takes Me back to who is really supposed to be dumb here.  Damn near ANY female Dominant knows this, so I can promise you that the stupid ones aren't us.

Please enjoy your day.


***  Writer's note.  Part of this answer is for the upcoming thread to answer why the OP can not find a Dominant female.  I'm just saving Myself the time.



spideycool69 -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:46:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm voting with "thinly veiled attempt to discuss the same kink with a different twist".  Really, OP, that is all you did.  Just added the bit about financial domination to discuss physical strength/take downs.  I haven't cast My vote yet on who is really supposed to be stupid in this little game.

Now, OP, I'm going to try to help you out.  Here's a very simple rule of business.  Advertising of any sort (such as a web page for a pro) is supposed to entice customers.  In this scenario, that means selling certain fantasies that people are willing to buy.  For many clients, part of the fantasy is to dream of living full time with their professional.  Ergo, you will see a reference to fueling such fantasies on some websites.

Here's another bit of help.  You are coming off as what is frequently called a one trick pony.  That is somebody who has one particular kink or fetish that they are so focused on that it conveys that kink/fetish is more important than the woman that they are engaging in the activity with.  This is a huge turn off for women and explains your problem with not being able to meet anybody willing to engage in these activities with you.  I'm willing to bet that if I go back and look for any other prior threads you've started, they are related to take downs.

For definition, a take down scene is the concept that one person will physically overpower the other.  In other words, physically forcing them to submit.  It's usually associated with play rape scenarios, but not always.  You'll often find that female submissives are very open to discussing how much of a turn on this can be for them with their male Dominants.  Some male submissives love the idea just as much.  Let's face it.  There are a lot of males who would love a woman to pin them down for wild, crazy monkey sex.  It's the same drive.  Males also want to be forced, taken, used, rode hard and put away wet.

This takes Me back to who is really supposed to be dumb here.  Damn near ANY female Dominant knows this, so I can promise you that the stupid ones aren't us.

Please enjoy your day.


***  Writer's note.  Part of this answer is for the upcoming thread to answer why the OP can not find a Dominant female.  I'm just saving Myself the time.



Am I going into depth about physical strength here? I asked a general question that does a Financial Mistress needs to be physically stronger in order to dominate or is it just about mind control. I asked this question about Financial Mistresses in a "Ask a Mistress" forum. Makes sense. People gave their opinions and that's it. I didn't go into depth about physical strength. I'm not shoving these quesitons down into people's throats. It's an open question. Those who want to answer it can answer it. This was a general knowledge question for me. Although, I have a fetish for being a money slave but it's just a fetish. I won't try it. I did try once on here. My fetish is not the cause of this question. I just wanted to know. And, yes do go back and look for any other prior threads I've started. In fact why don't you just view my forum posts on my profile. That will be much easier. I've only created three threads so far.

"Ask a Mistress" my ass. I can't ask shit on here.



PeonForHer -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:53:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain

I used the word "personally" for a reason...and I'm not most women.


So . . . you pack some creditable muscle then, MIP? Interesting! Nothing at all wrong with a woman having some sinew, in my book. No indeedy.



LadyPact -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 6:57:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: spideycool69
"Ask a Mistress" my ass. I can't ask shit on here.

Oh, you can ask anything you'd like.  Just don't be surprised when people call you on what they think are your real motivations.  It happens quite frequently on these boards.



hopelesslyInvo -> RE: Should a Financial Mistress be stronger than her slave (4/30/2012 7:00:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm voting with "thinly veiled attempt to discuss the same kink with a different twist". Really, OP, that is all you did. Just added the bit about financial domination to discuss physical strength/take downs.




i'm voting with "it's the kink version of first discussing how awesome cream is, then discussing how awesome chocolate cookies are, and now attempting to discuss how awesome an oreo is when you put those two things together".

i'm also voting that the next thread will be be the equivalent of bringing a glass of milk into the picture~




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875