RaspberryLemon
Posts: 422
Joined: 7/18/2011 Status: offline
|
Although your post was worded in a somewhat off-putting/creepy manner (I agree with poise here--why does the dog being female make a difference?,) I do see similarities between dealing with owning dogs and owning people (at the very least, some people--including myself.) Regardless of approach (which will vary by the individual--dog OR human,) consistency is always key. Not only for communication's sake, but for building trust and stability and a platform for mutual respect. Consistency is a very important factor in your subordinate' regard for you as the leader. Most dogs (and people) respond well to positive reinforcement. Be that praise, food, access to certain privileges, etc.--something rewarding. The motivation here will vary, but the point being is that, just like LadyConstanze mentioned, you want them to obey because they want to please you, not because they are scared of you. They should be eager to please because they admire, appreciate, and love you. Likewise, sometimes correction can be necessary. Whether it be a look or a firm tone of voice, removal of something positive, some require it--some more than others. However, the method that works with one may not with another. Adjustments, rethinking, and putting effort into knowing what makes that individual tick and how they think and feel is necessary, regardless of species. So yes. There are a lot of parallels. Of course, humans are not dogs, and vice versa. Dogs do not think the same way we do, and that's important to keep in mind--their perception of the world is not colored through the human lens, but that of a dog. And, by nature, they cannot communicate with us in as much complexity as we can each other--so when working with dogs, explaining yourself and talking does not work as it will with a human. There are parallels, but also many differences--they are similar, but not the same.
|