LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
I''m going to preface this by saying that I've read it through a couple of times and I've got this odd feeling that some of My answers are going to make Me want to keep My flame retardant suit handy. I also happen to be on night three of insomnia, so if I don't do the best with My terms, just ask for clarity. quote:
ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt I have been kicking a thread topic around in my head for a couple days now. The thing is, I want to begin the thread in such as way as to leave the topic as wide open as possible. So, with this in mind, let's begin with some definitions and see where the convo leads. I do have to tell you, CP, that I'm not surprised that you brought this topic at all. I think you and I might have had some similar thoughts bouncing around in the brain the last couple of days, even if it is from different perspectives and different reasons. Generally, I consider that a good sign. quote:
What is your definition of mental domination? How do you use it or how has it been used on you? I am going to throw the cheesy answer out there and say, from My perspective, that it's the type of Domination that yields the greater amount of power and control, as opposed to the primary force being physical or sexual. This is probably sounding a little "one true way" to some, but it crosses My mind with enough frequency that there are repeated random examples that display those who lead with sexual Domination often don't have the same kind of inner strength. Before somebody accuses Me of being catty for that comment, I want to make it clearly understood that I see it in both male and female Dominants who use that particular method. As for definition itself, I'm going with the technique used in the process of bending one's will to another. I say process because in My realm of experience, the greater depth of submission to Me has happened over time. I've seen in others that the instant "boom" it's just completely there from the beginning. I just haven't happened to share a dynamic with that type, rather than the process type. quote:
How would you define internal enslavement? Again, how does it play out in your relationship (or not)? I don't know if anybody is going to understand what I'm trying to convey here, but I'm going to give it a shot. Call it the process from the s-type's side. It's from thinking, to feeling, to believing, to knowing without question that they are enslaved to another. That knowing can get to such a depth that it becomes a part of the slave's inner core. It's as much a part of them as any other form of inner consciousness. quote:
Do you find this type of domination extreme, or do you view it as part n parcel of a "normal" M/s or D/s relationship? I don't see it as extreme. I do see it more often in those who identify as M/s, rather than D/s. The caveat to that is the possibility that My perspective may be slanted due to more exposure in the leather community. quote:
Is there a certain personality type that makes internal enslavement easier? I'm not going to say a certain personality type. I am going to say that there are certain people who are more easily guided to internal enslavement. Speaking realistically, this can come from either a healthy place or an unhealthy place. Humans are just too complicated for Me to try to go into that in a quick, concise manner. quote:
Can you go "too far" with mental domination or internal enslavement? I believe that you can. Of course, I think that's a very individual thing and a determination of too far has to come from personal assessment. quote:
What about loss of autonomy? Do all s-types incur loss of autonomy? Is that the point, from the dominant's perspective? Not all s-types, no. I'd find it really hard to believe that a high majority of bedroom submissives lose autonomy. Again, I'm going to associate this more often in M/s than D/s. I don't know if it's commonly felt to be the point, but it's most certainly done by design. Just look at all of the ways this is subtly conveyed in our culture. (Again, very much so in the leather community.) We put the prominence out there of how much the s-type is associated with the M-type's identity. It's done by different degrees depending on the people and the dynamic itself, but it's not hard to see when you look for it. quote:
If your s-type loses too much autonomy, what steps do you take to rectify this? Can you "undo" internal enslavement and still keep the slave? These two are darn good questions, btw. If the concern is too much autonomy being lost, it's time to put them in situations where it's the natural result that they gain ground. Maybe it's time to take that class that is based on one of their interests. I'm also a big fan of sub sigs (special interest groups where available. Specifically outside interests that are separate from the balance in the dynamic. I can't say that I've contemplated reversing the process of internal enslavement while still wanting to keep the slave. It took Me a couple of minutes for Me to get something to connect as to why I would want to do this. I would have to get somebody to such a depth of internal enslavement that we're talking about things like damage or inability to function as a person in the world. Realistically, who does that? To Me, I'd have to think that would be confusing on certain levels to the slave. (I'm choosing the term slave very specifically for this.) The concept of reversing internal enslavement, I would have to think, is easier to grasp on an intellectual level when it's done based on the slave transitioning back to independence when leaving active slavery behind. quote:
Please feel free to expand and explore on these fascinating topics. Thank you, CP Thank you for bringing the topic. It has allowed for some more in-depth reflection on My part.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|