RemoteUser -> RE: Is 1 Not enouph (5/5/2012 8:57:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Youngmanbdsm Ok I am just looking around and doms and dommes say they have farms of slaves and I'm just thinking one is enouph to love and care for right? I've done both, and am flexible to situations and people. Love is what you give, not what you get, so by definition one would never be enough. That can be tackled at any level of love's definition you wish to take on - religious/spiritual or psychoanalytical. Now if you are talking about wanting one person to be exclusive to you, that's bonding and mating at an encoded genetic level, not love. Care carries a similar context. Do you only care about one author? One car? One memory? Probably not. All things earn a level of attachment (or detachment) from us as they integrate into our existence. I suspect you want a book I once read, about finding someone that wants no one but you, who captures you so deeply that no one else is worthy of your notice. This is a good dream (if you can't handle ideology, naysayers, you need to sleep deeper and find heavier dreams!) with the very important caveat that you understand that as an ideology it does not dictate reality. In fact, ideologies by definition defy reality. If you find it and want it, keep it! If you find it and lose it, learn from it! If you seek it and cannot find it, you are lonely, yes, and human, like the rest. I am certainly human, even if I rarely feel like one. One last note. If you don't like something, you're entitled, but if you condemn someone, you hand them the right to condemn you. As alien as something seems it is not necessarily wrong for people other than you. [;)] *climbs back into the coffin*
|
|
|
|